Do Contact Precautions Reduce the Incidence of Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections? The DPCPYO (Detection and Contact Precautions for Patients With P. aeruginosa) Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ICU
PFGE
contact precautions
patient-to-patient transmission
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2021
02 11 2021
Historique:
received:
21
08
2020
accepted:
26
10
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
11
11
2021
entrez:
2
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The issue of contact precautions as contributory factors for reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections in intensive care units (ICUs) remains questioned. We evaluated the impact of the addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients on incidence of ICU-acquired Pa infections. In this multicenter, cluster-randomized crossover trial, 10 French ICUs were randomly assigned (1:1) to sequence 0-1 (6-month control period [CP]/3-month washout period/6-month intervention period [IP]) or sequence 1-0 (6-month IP/3-month washout period/6-month CP). A surveillance screening program for Pa was implemented. Competing-risks regression models were built with death and discharge without the occurrence of ICU-acquired Pa infection (the primary outcome) as competing events. Models were adjusted for within-ICU correlation and patient- and ICU-level covariates. The Simpson diversity index (SDI) and transmission index (TI) of Pa isolates were derived from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. Within recruited ICUs, the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of ICU-acquired Pa infections were 3.38% (55/1625) versus 3.44% (57/1658) and 3.31 versus 3.52 per 1000 patient-days at risk during the CP and IP, respectively. Multivariable models indicated that the intervention did not significantly change the cumulative incidence (subdistribution hazard ratio, .91; 95% confidence interval [CI], .49-1.67; P = .76) or rate (cause-specific hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, .71-2.63; P = .36) of the primary outcome. SDI and TI did not significantly differ between CP and IP. The addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients with a surveillance screening program does not significantly reduce ICU-acquired Pa infections in non-outbreak situations. Clinical Trials Registration. ISRCTN92710225.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The issue of contact precautions as contributory factors for reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections in intensive care units (ICUs) remains questioned. We evaluated the impact of the addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients on incidence of ICU-acquired Pa infections.
METHODS
In this multicenter, cluster-randomized crossover trial, 10 French ICUs were randomly assigned (1:1) to sequence 0-1 (6-month control period [CP]/3-month washout period/6-month intervention period [IP]) or sequence 1-0 (6-month IP/3-month washout period/6-month CP). A surveillance screening program for Pa was implemented. Competing-risks regression models were built with death and discharge without the occurrence of ICU-acquired Pa infection (the primary outcome) as competing events. Models were adjusted for within-ICU correlation and patient- and ICU-level covariates. The Simpson diversity index (SDI) and transmission index (TI) of Pa isolates were derived from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing.
RESULTS
Within recruited ICUs, the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of ICU-acquired Pa infections were 3.38% (55/1625) versus 3.44% (57/1658) and 3.31 versus 3.52 per 1000 patient-days at risk during the CP and IP, respectively. Multivariable models indicated that the intervention did not significantly change the cumulative incidence (subdistribution hazard ratio, .91; 95% confidence interval [CI], .49-1.67; P = .76) or rate (cause-specific hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, .71-2.63; P = .36) of the primary outcome. SDI and TI did not significantly differ between CP and IP.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of contact precautions to standard precautions for Pa-positive patients with a surveillance screening program does not significantly reduce ICU-acquired Pa infections in non-outbreak situations. Clinical Trials Registration. ISRCTN92710225.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33137174
pii: 5952273
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1663
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2781-e2788Subventions
Organisme : French Ministry of Health
Investigateurs
Gilles Capellier
(G)
Emmanuel Samain
(E)
Alexandre Boyer
(A)
Véronique Dubois
(V)
Didier Gruson
(D)
Anne-Sylvie Dumenil
(AS)
Christelle Guillet-Caruba
(C)
Fréderic Jacobs
(F)
Charlotte Arbelot
(C)
Hanaa Benmansour
(H)
Laurence Drieux-Rouzet
(L)
Antoine Monsel
(A)
Anne Carricajo
(A)
Eric Diconne
(E)
Florence Grattard
(F)
Nicolas Maillard
(N)
Jérôme Morel
(J)
Bruno Pozzetto
(B)
Sandra Dos Santos
(S)
Martine Ferrandière
(M)
Roland Quentin
(R)
Anne-Charlotte Tellier
(AC)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.