Psychosocial and family-centered support among breast cancer patients with dependent children.
breast neoplasm
cancer
dependent children
parental cancer
psycho-oncology
psychosocial need
psychosocial support systems
quality of life
social support
Journal
Psycho-oncology
ISSN: 1099-1611
Titre abrégé: Psychooncology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9214524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
revised:
22
10
2020
received:
27
03
2020
accepted:
25
10
2020
pubmed:
3
11
2020
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
2
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the psychosocial situation of breast cancer (BC) patients with dependent children, with regard to who used family-centered psychosocial support (PS) services, reasons against using it, as well as existing, unmet needs, and current PS need. Data were collected via survey and patient files during an inpatient rehabilitation program for mothers with BC, who were accompanied by a child <12 years. Descriptive statistics and tests for statistical significance were used. Out of the total of 561 patients, 23.0% had used family-centered PS services before. Common reasons against it were enough support, no anticipated need and organizational issues. Patients stated a high number of unmet needs. The most urgent ones related to their children. About 59.3% of mothers stated a current PS need (PSN) and 33.3% a need for their children. Little social support and a worse maternal HRQOL, but not time since diagnosis, were related to a higher PSN in mothers and children (bivariate association). Among BC patients with dependent children, clinicians need to take the whole family and their support needs into account. They should know about the existing organizational barriers, which need to be overcome with the help of tailored offers. Patients with low HRQOL, little social support and single-mothers (with regard to children's PSN) need special attention as these can be indicators of high PSN.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
361-368Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Miedema B, Easley J. Barriers to rehabilitative care for young breast cancer survivors: a qualitative understanding. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(6):1193-1201.
Inhestern L, Bergelt C. When a mother has cancer: strains and resources of affected families from the mother's and father's perspective - a qualitative study. BMC Women's Health. 2018;18(1):72.
Banz-Jansen C, Heinrichs A, Hedderich M, et al. Characteristics and therapy of premenopausal patients with early-onset breast cancer in Germany. Archives Gynecol Obstetrics. 2012;286(2):489-493.
Champion VL, Wagner LI, Monahan PO, et al. Comparison of younger and older breast cancer survivors and age-matched controls on specific and overall quality of life domains. Cancer. 2014;120(15):2237-2246.
Zainal NZ, Nik-Jaafar NR, Baharudin A, Sabki ZA, Ng CG. Prevalence of depression in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of observational studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2013;14(4):2649-2656.
Mehnert A, Koch U. Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization, and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register-based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosomatic Res. 2008;64(4):383-391.
Mehnert A, Brahler E, Faller H, et al. Four-week prevalence of mental disorders in patients with cancer across major tumor entities. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3540-3546.
Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt GE, Pendlebury S, Hobbs KM, Wain G. Breast cancer survivors' supportive care needs 2-10 years after diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(5):515-523.
Marschner N, Trarbach T, Rauh J, et al. Quality of life in pre- and postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis from the prospective MaLife project. Breast Canc Res Treat. 2019;175(3):701-712.
Faller H, Brahler E, Harter M, et al. Unmet needs for information and psychosocial support in relation to quality of life and emotional distress: a comparison between gynecological and breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(10):1934-1942.
Bultmann JC, Beierlein V, Romer G, Moller B, Koch U, Bergelt C. Parental cancer: health-related quality of life and current psychosocial support needs of cancer survivors and their children. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2668-2677.
Ernst JC, Beierlein V, Romer G, Moller B, Koch U, Bergelt C. Use and need for psychosocial support in cancer patients: a population-based sample of patients with minor children. Cancer. 2013;119(12):2333-2341.
Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends--an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):16-27.
Robert Koch-Institut und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland (e.V.). Krebs in Deutschland 2013/2014. 11. Berlin: Ausgabe; 2017.
Hammersen F, Pursche T, Fischer D, Katalinic A, Waldmann A. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among young patients with breast cancer. Breast Care. 2020;15(2):163-170.
Sozialgesetzbuch SGB. Sechstes Buch (VI) - Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung - (Artikel 1 des Gesetzes v. 18. Dezember 1989 BIS, 1990 I S. 1337), zuletzt geändert durch Artikel 312 der Verordnung vom 19. Juni 2020 (BGBl. I S. 1328). § 31 SGB VI: Sonstige Leistungen.
Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503-513.
Brouckaert O, Laenen A, Vanderhaegen J, et al. Applying the 2011 St Gallen panel of prognostic markers on a large single hospital cohort of consecutively treated primary operable breast cancers. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(10):2578-2584.
Federal Institute for Research on Building UAaSD: Laufende Raumbeobachtung - Raumabgrenzungen. Siedlungsstrukturelle Kreistypen. 2020. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/kreise/siedlungsstrukturelle-kreistypen/kreistypen.html. Accessed October 29, 2020.
Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365-376.
Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D. Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC quality of life group. In: Cancer EOfRaTo, ed. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels, Belgium, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. 3rd ed. 2001.
Giesinger JM, Loth FLC, Aaronson NK, et al. Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:1-8.
Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire Core 30. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):89-96.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, AWMF). S3-Leitlinie Früherkennung, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. AWMF Registernumm; 2020. Version 4.3. 032-045OL.
Ernstmann N, Neumann M, Ommen O, et al. Determinants and implications of cancer patients' psychosocial needs. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(11):1417-1423.
Taylor S. Social support: a review. In: Friedman H, ed. Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook Of Health Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011:189-214.
Purc-Stephenson R, Lyseng A. How are the kids holding up? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychosocial impact of maternal breast cancer on children. Canc Treat Rev. 2016;49:45-56.