A novel 3D technique to assess symmetry of hemi pelvises.
Aged
Female
Fractures, Bone
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures
Patient Care Planning
Pelvic Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Pelvis
/ diagnostic imaging
Plastic Surgery Procedures
Rotation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2020
02 11 2020
Historique:
received:
29
03
2020
accepted:
16
10
2020
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anatomical reconstruction of pelvic fractures has been shown to affect functional outcome. Using the contra lateral side of the extremities to create a template for an ipsilateral reconstruction is common practice in orthopedic surgery. We aimed to assess whether hemi pelvises are symmetrical in terms of translation and rotation using 3D reconstruction, point to point mirroring and merging of the 3D created volumes, a method with previous proven high precision and accuracy. CT images of ten randomly selected patients were used. The DICOM images were converted to STL files. Three dimensional images of left hemi pelvis were reversed and merged with the right side. The posterior aspect of the pelvises was considered static and the anterior aspect as moving. Differences in translation and rotation were measured. There were no statistically significant differences between right and left hemi pelvis. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for all mean angular differences between right hemi pelvis and mirrored left hemi pelvis were - 2° to 1.5°. The 95% CI for all mean translational differences between these two objects were - 2.3 to 2.9 mm. Differences between the right hemi pelvis and the mirrored images of the left hemi pelvis for any patient greater than 3 mm or 2 degrees could be excluded with a 95% confidence. The left and right hemi pelvis of healthy adults are symmetrical enough. The pre-operative planning based on a healthy contra lateral side seems reasonable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33139837
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75884-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-75884-y
pmc: PMC7606510
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18789Références
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Feb 24;11:27
pubmed: 26911571
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Aug;15(8):1267-1277
pubmed: 32249403
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7
pubmed: 23571293
J Anat. 2012 Aug;221(2):121-7
pubmed: 22671309
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1335-9
pubmed: 12811280
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3681458
pubmed: 28243598
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Feb 22;11:26
pubmed: 26898717
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Aug;29(8):365-9
pubmed: 26200466
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul;31(7):e210-e216
pubmed: 28240619
J Orthop Case Rep. 2015 Jan-Mar;5(1):23-5
pubmed: 27299013
Surg Radiol Anat. 2020 Jun;42(6):635-639
pubmed: 31781921
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):708-15
pubmed: 23681407
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):215-224
pubmed: 27785534
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):129-40
pubmed: 8769444
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1;32:315-324
pubmed: 29791698
Orthopedics. 2013 May;36(5):e593-600
pubmed: 23672911
Acta Orthop. 2010 Aug;81(4):487-94
pubmed: 20465528
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar;33(3):e79-e83
pubmed: 30562250
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1147-1154
pubmed: 28325671
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Jan;58(1):75-82
pubmed: 31745838
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Aug;26(8):474-81
pubmed: 22391403