A Behavioral Change Smartphone App and Program (ToDo-CR) to Decrease Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants: Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study.
cardiac rehabilitation
eHealth
mHealth
mobile phone
sedentary behavior
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Nov 2020
03 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
12
2019
accepted:
02
10
2020
revised:
12
03
2020
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac rehabilitation participants are encouraged to meet physical activity guidelines to reduce the risk of repeat cardiac events. However, previous studies have found that physical activity levels are low and sedentary behavior is high, both during and after cardiac rehabilitation. There is potential for smartphone apps to be effective in reducing sedentary behavior, although among the few studies that have investigated smartphone apps in cardiac rehabilitation, none targeted sedentary behavior. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a behavioral smartphone app (Vire) and a web-based behavior change program (ToDo-CR) to decrease sedentary behavior in cardiac rehabilitation participants. Using a single-center, pre-post design, participants were recruited by nursing staff on admission to cardiac rehabilitation. All eligible participants installed the Vire app, were given a Fitbit Flex, and received the 6-week ToDo-CR program while attending cardiac rehabilitation. The ToDo-CR program uses personalized analytics to interpret important behavioral aspects (physical activity, variety, and social opportunity) and real-time information for generating and suggesting context-specific actionable microbehavioral alternatives (Do's). Do's were delivered via the app, with participants receiving 14 to 19 Do's during the 6-week intervention period. Outcome measures were collected at 0, 6, and 16 weeks. The assessors were not blinded. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, resource requirements, app usability (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 [UTAUT2] questionnaire), and objectively measured daily minutes of sedentary behavior (ActiGraph) for sample size estimation. Secondary outcomes included functional aerobic capacity (6-min walk test), quality of life (MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire), BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and blood pressure. Between January and May 2019, 20 participants were recruited consecutively. One-third of people who commenced cardiac rehabilitation were eligible to participate. Other than declining to take part in the study (15/40, 38%), not having a smartphone was a major reason for exclusion (11/40, 28%). Those excluded without a smartphone were significantly older than participants with a smartphone (mean difference 20 [SD 5] years; P<.001). Participants were, on average, aged 54 (SD 13) years, mostly male (17/20, 85%), and working (12/20, 67%). At 6 weeks, 95% (19/20) of participants were assessed, and 60% (12/20) of participants were assessed at 16 weeks. Participants were relatively satisfied with the usability of the app (UTAUT2 questionnaire). Overall, participants spent 11 to 12 hours per day sitting. There was a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.54) for the reduction in sedentary behavior (minutes per day) over 16 weeks. The use of a behavioral smartphone app to decrease sitting time appears to be feasible in cardiac rehabilitation. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine the effectiveness of the app.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiac rehabilitation participants are encouraged to meet physical activity guidelines to reduce the risk of repeat cardiac events. However, previous studies have found that physical activity levels are low and sedentary behavior is high, both during and after cardiac rehabilitation. There is potential for smartphone apps to be effective in reducing sedentary behavior, although among the few studies that have investigated smartphone apps in cardiac rehabilitation, none targeted sedentary behavior.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a behavioral smartphone app (Vire) and a web-based behavior change program (ToDo-CR) to decrease sedentary behavior in cardiac rehabilitation participants.
METHODS
METHODS
Using a single-center, pre-post design, participants were recruited by nursing staff on admission to cardiac rehabilitation. All eligible participants installed the Vire app, were given a Fitbit Flex, and received the 6-week ToDo-CR program while attending cardiac rehabilitation. The ToDo-CR program uses personalized analytics to interpret important behavioral aspects (physical activity, variety, and social opportunity) and real-time information for generating and suggesting context-specific actionable microbehavioral alternatives (Do's). Do's were delivered via the app, with participants receiving 14 to 19 Do's during the 6-week intervention period. Outcome measures were collected at 0, 6, and 16 weeks. The assessors were not blinded. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, resource requirements, app usability (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 [UTAUT2] questionnaire), and objectively measured daily minutes of sedentary behavior (ActiGraph) for sample size estimation. Secondary outcomes included functional aerobic capacity (6-min walk test), quality of life (MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire), BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and blood pressure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between January and May 2019, 20 participants were recruited consecutively. One-third of people who commenced cardiac rehabilitation were eligible to participate. Other than declining to take part in the study (15/40, 38%), not having a smartphone was a major reason for exclusion (11/40, 28%). Those excluded without a smartphone were significantly older than participants with a smartphone (mean difference 20 [SD 5] years; P<.001). Participants were, on average, aged 54 (SD 13) years, mostly male (17/20, 85%), and working (12/20, 67%). At 6 weeks, 95% (19/20) of participants were assessed, and 60% (12/20) of participants were assessed at 16 weeks. Participants were relatively satisfied with the usability of the app (UTAUT2 questionnaire). Overall, participants spent 11 to 12 hours per day sitting. There was a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.54) for the reduction in sedentary behavior (minutes per day) over 16 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of a behavioral smartphone app to decrease sitting time appears to be feasible in cardiac rehabilitation. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine the effectiveness of the app.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33141091
pii: v4i11e17359
doi: 10.2196/17359
pmc: PMC7671837
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e17359Informations de copyright
©Nicole Freene, Sander van Berlo, Margaret McManus, Tarryn Mair, Rachel Davey. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 03.11.2020.
Références
J Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb 7;52(2):jrm00021
pubmed: 32030433
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(6):406-19
pubmed: 25068393
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Jan 15;5(1):e3
pubmed: 29335235
Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;19(1S):32-41
pubmed: 10709946
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Nov;26(11):e98-e99
pubmed: 28528778
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):664-81
pubmed: 22718797
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):226-239
pubmed: 27757789
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Jun 04;7(6):
pubmed: 31167489
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Mar;25(5):505-521
pubmed: 29313363
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 May;29(5):696-702
pubmed: 31235365
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jan 08;2:3
pubmed: 14713315
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jan;63(1):53-58
pubmed: 31465863
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788
pubmed: 30496103
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1770-9
pubmed: 24973083
Am Heart J. 2016 Aug;178:85-94
pubmed: 27502855
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 26;172(6):494-500
pubmed: 22450936
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 08;21(4):e11604
pubmed: 30958272
Obes Rev. 2014 Nov;15(11):905-19
pubmed: 25112481
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):121-9
pubmed: 17558191
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Aug;27(4):322-32
pubmed: 23992038
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e54
pubmed: 21169167
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 22;(12):CD009386
pubmed: 26691216
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 19;16:95
pubmed: 27431419
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67
pubmed: 20637084
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):453-68
pubmed: 20205982
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):505
pubmed: 29661241
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1302-10
pubmed: 27475271
Digit Health. 2018 Jul 09;4:2055207618785798
pubmed: 31463076
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 08;7(2):e40
pubmed: 29422454
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 24;5(10):e161
pubmed: 29066425
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):671-86
pubmed: 24497157
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Mar;27(5):478-489
pubmed: 31597473
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 May;23(8):818-25
pubmed: 26607698
Sports Med. 2017 Sep;47(9):1821-1845
pubmed: 28303543
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 May;24(5):430-41
pubmed: 25637253
Physiotherapy. 2012 Dec;98(4):277-86
pubmed: 23122432
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2015 Jul;8(5):283-92
pubmed: 25946990
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Sep;14(5):411-6
pubmed: 21616714
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 11;14(1):105
pubmed: 28800736
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2378-2384
pubmed: 28623143
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Jun;12(6):350-60
pubmed: 25801714
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 25;11:97
pubmed: 25059981
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1561-7
pubmed: 21233777