Effect of a Text Messaging-Based Educational Intervention on Cesarean Section Rates Among Pregnant Women in China: Quasirandomized Controlled Trial.

SMS text messaging cesarean section mobile health quasirandomized controlled trial short message service

Journal

JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 11 2020
Historique:
received: 07 05 2020
accepted: 22 09 2020
revised: 12 09 2020
entrez: 3 11 2020
pubmed: 4 11 2020
medline: 16 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Consensus exists that appropriate regional cesarean rates should not exceed 15% of births, but China's cesarean rate exceeds 50% in some areas, prompting numerous calls for its reduction. At present, China's 2016 two-child policy has heightened the implications of national cesarean section trends. This study leveraged pervasive cellular phone access amongst Chinese citizens to test the effect of a low-cost and scalable prenatal advice program on cesarean section rates. Participants were pregnant women presenting for antenatal care at a clinic in Xi'an, China. Assignment was quasirandomized and utilized factorial assignment based on the expecting mother's birthday. Participants were assigned to one of the following four groups, with each receiving a different set of messages: (1) a comparison group that received only a few "basic" messages, (2) a group receiving messages primarily regarding care seeking, (3) a group receiving messages primarily regarding good home prenatal practices, and (4) a group receiving text messages of all groups. Messages were delivered throughout pregnancy and were tailored to each woman's gestational week. The main outcome was the rates of cesarean delivery reported in the intervention arms. Data analysts were blinded to treatment assignment. In total, 2115 women completed the trial and corresponding follow-up surveys. In the unadjusted analysis, the group receiving all texts was associated with an odds ratio of 0.77 (P=.06), though neither the care seeking nor good home prenatal practice set yielded a relevant impact. Adjusting for potentially confounding covariates showed that the group with all texts sent together was associated with an odds ratio of 0.67 (P=.01). Notably, previous cesarean section evoked an odds ratio of 11.78 (P<.001), highlighting that having a cesarean section predicts future cesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy. Sending pregnant women in rural China short informational messages with integrated advice regarding both care-seeking and good home prenatal practices appears to reduce women's likelihood of undergoing cesarean section. Reducing clear medical indications for cesarean section seems to be the strongest potential pathway of the effect. Cesarean section based on only maternal request did not seem to occur regularly in our study population. Preventing unnecessary cesarean section at present may have a long-term impact on future cesarean section rates. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02037087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02037087. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011016.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Consensus exists that appropriate regional cesarean rates should not exceed 15% of births, but China's cesarean rate exceeds 50% in some areas, prompting numerous calls for its reduction. At present, China's 2016 two-child policy has heightened the implications of national cesarean section trends.
OBJECTIVE
This study leveraged pervasive cellular phone access amongst Chinese citizens to test the effect of a low-cost and scalable prenatal advice program on cesarean section rates.
METHODS
Participants were pregnant women presenting for antenatal care at a clinic in Xi'an, China. Assignment was quasirandomized and utilized factorial assignment based on the expecting mother's birthday. Participants were assigned to one of the following four groups, with each receiving a different set of messages: (1) a comparison group that received only a few "basic" messages, (2) a group receiving messages primarily regarding care seeking, (3) a group receiving messages primarily regarding good home prenatal practices, and (4) a group receiving text messages of all groups. Messages were delivered throughout pregnancy and were tailored to each woman's gestational week. The main outcome was the rates of cesarean delivery reported in the intervention arms. Data analysts were blinded to treatment assignment.
RESULTS
In total, 2115 women completed the trial and corresponding follow-up surveys. In the unadjusted analysis, the group receiving all texts was associated with an odds ratio of 0.77 (P=.06), though neither the care seeking nor good home prenatal practice set yielded a relevant impact. Adjusting for potentially confounding covariates showed that the group with all texts sent together was associated with an odds ratio of 0.67 (P=.01). Notably, previous cesarean section evoked an odds ratio of 11.78 (P<.001), highlighting that having a cesarean section predicts future cesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS
Sending pregnant women in rural China short informational messages with integrated advice regarding both care-seeking and good home prenatal practices appears to reduce women's likelihood of undergoing cesarean section. Reducing clear medical indications for cesarean section seems to be the strongest potential pathway of the effect. Cesarean section based on only maternal request did not seem to occur regularly in our study population. Preventing unnecessary cesarean section at present may have a long-term impact on future cesarean section rates.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02037087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02037087.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011016.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33141099
pii: v8i11e19953
doi: 10.2196/19953
pmc: PMC7671841
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02037087']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e19953

Informations de copyright

©Yanfang Su, Jesse Heitner, Changzheng Yuan, Yafei Si, Dan Wang, Zhiying Zhou, Zhongliang Zhou. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 03.11.2020.

Références

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 May;3(5):e260-70
pubmed: 25866355
BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71
pubmed: 21067593
Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):83-94
pubmed: 12051189
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 May;22(43):159-68
pubmed: 24908467
BMJ. 2007 Nov 17;335(7628):1025
pubmed: 17977819
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):817.e1-9
pubmed: 25640048
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 26;12:1031
pubmed: 23181985
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9
pubmed: 20071021
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Oct;23(5):777-82
pubmed: 23325124
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Jan;19(1):4-9
pubmed: 19733050
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jan 09;6:59-74
pubmed: 24470775
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 28;7(2):e10645
pubmed: 30816850
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 25;17(5):
pubmed: 32106558
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 28;8(5):e15111
pubmed: 32463373
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jul;16(5):1092-101
pubmed: 21688111
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1077-82
pubmed: 18448738
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 10;6(8):e011016
pubmed: 27515750
Health Educ Res. 2005 Jun;20(3):275-90
pubmed: 15632099
Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1463-1464
pubmed: 24766963
Health Educ Res. 2013 Oct;28(5):911-22
pubmed: 23640985
JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):69-76
pubmed: 28030701
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0202129
pubmed: 30183720
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 12;14:410
pubmed: 25495550
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93
pubmed: 24565430
BJOG. 2012 Sep;119(10):1256-64
pubmed: 22805598
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Apr;91(4):458-63
pubmed: 18556852
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1527-32
pubmed: 16677593
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):257-60
pubmed: 17011396
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1517-29
pubmed: 17138788
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 13;5(11):e008994
pubmed: 26567254
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 May;16(5):622-6
pubmed: 21342374

Auteurs

Yanfang Su (Y)

School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Jesse Heitner (J)

Aceso Global, Washington, DC, United States.

Changzheng Yuan (C)

The Children's Hospital and School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Nutrition Department, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Yafei Si (Y)

School of Risk & Actuarial Studies and Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Dan Wang (D)

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Zhiying Zhou (Z)

School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.

Zhongliang Zhou (Z)

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH