Liquid Biopsy Enables Quantification of the Abundance and Interindividual Variability of Hepatic Enzymes and Transporters.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological Transport
/ physiology
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System
/ metabolism
Exosomes
/ metabolism
Female
Humans
Inactivation, Metabolic
/ physiology
Liquid Biopsy
/ methods
Liver
/ metabolism
Male
Membrane Transport Proteins
/ metabolism
Metabolic Clearance Rate
/ physiology
Middle Aged
Young Adult
Journal
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
ISSN: 1532-6535
Titre abrégé: Clin Pharmacol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
17
07
2020
accepted:
14
10
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
21
5
2021
entrez:
3
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Variability in individual capacity for hepatic elimination of therapeutic drugs is well recognized and is associated with variable expression and activity of liver enzymes and transporters. Although genotyping offers some degree of stratification, there is often large variability within the same genotype. Direct measurement of protein expression is impractical due to limited access to tissue biopsies. Hence, determination of variability in hepatic drug metabolism and disposition using liquid biopsy (blood samples) is an attractive proposition during drug development and in clinical practice. This study used a multi-"omic" strategy to establish a liquid biopsy technology intended to assess hepatic capacity for metabolism and disposition in individual patients. Plasma exosomal analysis (n = 29) revealed expression of 533 pharmacologically relevant genes at the RNA level, with 147 genes showing evidence of expression at the protein level in matching liver tissue. Correction of exosomal RNA expression using a novel shedding factor improved correlation against liver protein expression for 97 liver-enriched genes. Strong correlation was demonstrated for 12 key drug-metabolizing enzymes and 4 drug transporters. The developed test allowed reliable patient stratification, and in silico trials demonstrated utility in adjusting drug dose to achieve similar drug exposure between patients with variable hepatic elimination. Accordingly, this approach can be applied in characterization of volunteers prior to enrollment in clinical trials and for patient stratification in clinical practice to achieve more precise individual dosing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33141922
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2102
pmc: PMC7839483
doi:
Substances chimiques
Membrane Transport Proteins
0
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System
9035-51-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
222-232Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
J Neurochem. 2018 Sep;146(6):670-685
pubmed: 29675872
Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 Aug;44(8):1246-52
pubmed: 27084892
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004 Apr;25(4):193-200
pubmed: 15063083
J Proteome Res. 2013 Dec 6;12(12):5934-42
pubmed: 24124648
Genome Med. 2016 Jan 29;8(1):12
pubmed: 26825779
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;83(2):234-42
pubmed: 17971818
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;11(8):743-746
pubmed: 30010447
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Oct;4(10):825-33
pubmed: 16224454
Nature. 2014 May 29;509(7502):582-7
pubmed: 24870543
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Sep;106(3):525-543
pubmed: 31175671
Mol Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;6(6):1766-74
pubmed: 19839641
J Proteomics. 2014 Sep 23;109:322-31
pubmed: 25063446
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2014 Sep;35(6):353-61
pubmed: 24931139
Br Med J. 1974 Oct 12;4(5936):91-4
pubmed: 4607336
Mol Syst Biol. 2019 Feb 18;15(2):e8503
pubmed: 30777892
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140712
pubmed: 26474073
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;107(1):85-88
pubmed: 31750932
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;105(6):1407-1420
pubmed: 30554411
Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Aug 24;6:400
pubmed: 20739923
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021 Jan 6;61:225-245
pubmed: 33035445
Oncol Rep. 2016 Nov;36(5):2535-2543
pubmed: 27599779
J Cell Sci. 2013 Dec 15;126(Pt 24):5553-65
pubmed: 24105262
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jan 30;178:112901
pubmed: 31610395
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul;110(1):13-21
pubmed: 18589210
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):753-64
pubmed: 19228618
Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 Oct;44(10):1550-61
pubmed: 27493152
AAPS J. 2019 Jan 9;21(2):17
pubmed: 30627939
Nat Methods. 2009 May;6(5):359-62
pubmed: 19377485
Drug Metab Dispos. 2014 Apr;42(4):500-10
pubmed: 24408517
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 5;115(23):E5334-E5343
pubmed: 29777089
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan;85(1):216-226
pubmed: 30340248
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Jun;58(6):1424-1432
pubmed: 27739922
Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):337-42
pubmed: 21593866
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012 Apr;51(4):409-18
pubmed: 22420032
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D733-45
pubmed: 26553804
Proteomics. 2011 Jun;11(12):2459-75
pubmed: 21595033
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Sep 23;491(3):675-680
pubmed: 28756226
Drug Metab Dispos. 2014 Aug;42(8):1349-56
pubmed: 24879845
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;107(1):72-75
pubmed: 31751490