Comparative Study of the Restorative Effects of Forest and Urban Videos during COVID-19 Lockdown: Intrinsic and Benchmark Values.
Adult
Aged
Anxiety
/ epidemiology
Benchmarking
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Female
Forests
Humans
Mental Health
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Quarantine
/ psychology
SARS-CoV-2
Stress, Physiological
Stress, Psychological
/ epidemiology
Video Recording
COVID-19
anxiety
audio-visual stimulation
environmental enrichment
forest environments
forest therapy
lockdown
mental health
quarantine
stress
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 10 2020
30 10 2020
Historique:
received:
29
08
2020
revised:
24
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
4
11
2020
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prolonged lockdown imposed to contain the COrona VIrus Disease 19 COVID-19 pandemic prevented many people from direct contact with nature and greenspaces, raising alarms for a possible worsening of mental health. This study investigated the effectiveness of a simple and affordable remedy for improving psychological well-being, based on audio-visual stimuli brought by a short computer video showing forest environments, with an urban video as a control. Randomly selected participants were assigned the forest or urban video, to look at and listen to early in the morning, and questionnaires to fill out. In particular, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Form Y collected in baseline condition and at the end of the study and the Part II of the Sheehan Patient Rated Anxiety Scale (SPRAS) collected every day immediately before and after watching the video. The virtual exposure to forest environments showed effective to reduce perceived anxiety levels in people forced by lockdown in limited spaces and environmental deprivation. Although significant, the effects were observed only in the short term, highlighting the limitation of the virtual experiences. The reported effects might also represent a benchmark to disentangle the determinants of health effects due to real forest experiences, for example, the inhalation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33143327
pii: ijerph17218011
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218011
pmc: PMC7672570
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 11;15(9):
pubmed: 30208583
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155911
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 Aug;63(8):1117-1134
pubmed: 31001682
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):
pubmed: 31861700
J Physiol Anthropol. 2007 Mar;26(2):123-8
pubmed: 17435354
Sante Publique. 2019 May 13;S1(HS):135-143
pubmed: 31210473
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213
pubmed: 32215365
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1321-1322
pubmed: 32277876
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jun 1;45(11):4660-5
pubmed: 21504154
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512
pubmed: 32283003
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Jun 22;24(1):46
pubmed: 31228960
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e21
pubmed: 32199510
Glob Adv Health Med. 2019 May 16;8:2164956119848654
pubmed: 31192052
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:118-36
pubmed: 22320203
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2016;19(7):305-343
pubmed: 27668460
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 15;10:2667
pubmed: 32010003
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2006;28(2):319-33
pubmed: 16873099
Exp Neurobiol. 2020 Apr 30;29(2):120-129
pubmed: 32408402
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1983;7(4-6):599-603
pubmed: 6141604
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2017 Jan;14(1):3-12
pubmed: 27160351
Psychol Health. 2020 Jun 22;:1-15
pubmed: 32567952
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1382-1393
pubmed: 32277878
J Physiol Anthropol. 2007 Mar;26(2):135-42
pubmed: 17435356
Environ Res. 2018 Oct;166:628-637
pubmed: 29982151
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10):
pubmed: 31100773
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;52(17):9545-9555
pubmed: 30064205
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 05;16(24):
pubmed: 31817339
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 03;13(8):
pubmed: 27527193
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 05;16(18):
pubmed: 31491931
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 31;125(7):075001
pubmed: 28796634
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Aug;52:102066
pubmed: 32302935
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009 Oct-Dec;22(4):951-9
pubmed: 20074458
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 28;14(8):
pubmed: 28788101
Science. 1984 Apr 27;224(4647):420-1
pubmed: 6143402
Environ Health Prev Med. 2010 Jan;15(1):18-26
pubmed: 19568835
Environ Health Prev Med. 2010 Jan;15(1):27-37
pubmed: 19585091
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986 May;73(5):559-65
pubmed: 3751661
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 26;15(2):
pubmed: 29373558
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Dec 1;24(1):70
pubmed: 31787069
Int J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;127(3):199-203
pubmed: 27033879
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Nov 08;14:3001-3013
pubmed: 30510422
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 23;17(1):
pubmed: 31877954
Environ Pollut. 2013 Dec;183:71-80
pubmed: 23597803