Parallels, differences and lessons: a comparison of the management of foot-and-mouth disease and COVID-19 using UK 2001/2020 as points of reference.
COVID-19
biosecurity
emergency management
exit strategies
foot-and-mouth disease
pandemic threats
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 11 2020
11 11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
11
2020
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an extremely infectious viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals which is highly challenging to control and can give rise to national animal health crises, especially if there is a lack of pre-existing immunity due to the emergence of new strains or following incursions into disease-free regions. The 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK was on a scale that initially overwhelmed the national veterinary services and was eventually controlled by livestock lockdown and slaughter on an unprecedented scale. In 2020, the rapid emergence of COVID-19 has led to a human pandemic unparalleled in living memory. The enormous logistics of multi-agency control efforts for COVID-19 are reminiscent of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK, as are the use of movement restrictions, not normally a feature of human disease control. The UK experience is internationally relevant as few countries have experienced national epidemic crises for both diseases. In this review, we reflect on the experiences and lessons learnt from UK and international responses to FMD and COVID-19 with respect to their management, including the challenge of preclinical viral transmission, threat awareness, early detection, different interpretations of scientific information, lockdown, biosecurity behaviour change, shortage of testing capacity and the choices for eradication versus living with infection. A major lesson is that the similarity of issues and critical resources needed to manage large-scale outbreaks demonstrates that there is benefit to a 'One Health' approach to preparedness, with potential for greater cooperation in planning and the consideration of shared critical resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33143581
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0906
pmc: PMC7735262
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200906Références
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:154-155
pubmed: 32179137
Rev Sci Tech. 2006 Apr;25(1):293-311
pubmed: 16796055
Ambio. 2017 Feb;46(1):18-29
pubmed: 27492678
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1459-68
pubmed: 18364313
Vet Rec. 2001 Dec 15;149(24):729-43
pubmed: 11808655
J Gen Virol. 2003 Jun;84(Pt 6):1583-1593
pubmed: 12771429
Vet Rec. 2001 Oct 6;149(14):430
pubmed: 11678219
J Comp Pathol. 2003 Jul;129(1):1-36
pubmed: 12859905
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:339-344
pubmed: 32198088
Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Dec;36(3):839-865
pubmed: 30160696
Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Dec;21(3):699-710
pubmed: 12523708
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;2(9):1449-1457
pubmed: 30082738
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 16;13:592
pubmed: 24341669
Vet Rec. 2012 Jun 23;170(25):637-9
pubmed: 22730497
Can Vet J. 2007 Oct;48(10):1051-62
pubmed: 17987967
J Infect Public Health. 2020 May;13(5):667-673
pubmed: 32340833
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):161-73
pubmed: 23958457
Can Vet J. 2011 Jul;52(7):794-6
pubmed: 22210948
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):436-46
pubmed: 24412502
J Virol Methods. 2017 Nov;249:102-110
pubmed: 28837842
Vet Rec. 2006 Sep 16;159(12):373-8
pubmed: 16980522
Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Dec;21(3):711-21
pubmed: 12523709
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1887-93
pubmed: 16485475
mBio. 2020 Aug 4;11(4):
pubmed: 32753488
Vet Rec. 2003 Jul 12;153(2):43-50
pubmed: 12885212
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Aug;64(4):1079-1094
pubmed: 27167976
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009 May;21(3):321-30
pubmed: 19407083
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015 Oct;62(5):505-15
pubmed: 24330476
Vet Rec. 2004 Sep 18;155(12):349-55
pubmed: 15493602