Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Airway Management
Coronavirus
Mechanical Ventilation
SARS-CoV-2
Tracheostomy
Journal
The Journal of laryngology and otology
ISSN: 1748-5460
Titre abrégé: J Laryngol Otol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706896
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Nov 2020
04 Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
5
11
2020
entrez:
4
11
2020
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation remains a matter of debate. This study analysed the timing and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy, and reports our experience of a dedicated ENT-anaesthetics department led tracheostomy team. A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted of patients undergoing tracheostomy, who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis, between 21st March and 20th May 2020. Eighty-one patients underwent tracheostomy after a median (interquartile range) of 16 (13-20) days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Median follow-up duration was 32 (23-40) days. Of patients, 86.7 per cent were successfully liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation in a median (interquartile range) of 12 (7-16) days. Moreover, 68.7 per cent were subsequently discharged from hospital. On univariate analysis, there was no difference in outcomes between early (before day 14) and late (day 14 or later) tracheostomy. The mortality rate was 8.6 per cent and no deaths were tracheostomy related. Outcomes appear favourable when patients are carefully selected. Percutaneous tracheostomy performed via a multidisciplinary approach, with appropriate training, was safe and optimised healthcare resource utilisation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33143760
doi: 10.1017/S0022215120002303
pii: S0022215120002303
pmc: PMC7729174
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-10Références
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):e181-e186
pubmed: 32541213
Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):e81-e88
pubmed: 30431492
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020 May;137(3):167-169
pubmed: 32307265
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):856-862
pubmed: 32281668
Heart Lung. 2019 Jan;48(1):46-54
pubmed: 30336945
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):1153-1161
pubmed: 30895877
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 1;202(3):460-463
pubmed: 32543208
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1282-1290
pubmed: 32304119
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1763-1770
pubmed: 32442528
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):135-137
pubmed: 32396455
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 May;102(5):343-347
pubmed: 32233651
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Aug;40(4):636-641
pubmed: 32767265
Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):e583-e584
pubmed: 32940347
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep;110(3):1006-1011
pubmed: 32339508
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2173-2184
pubmed: 32314050
Anaesthesia. 2020 Dec;75(12):1659-1670
pubmed: 32396986
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2174-2179
pubmed: 32445579
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun 1;146(6):517-518
pubmed: 32232426
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;277(7):2133-2135
pubmed: 32322959
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;163(3):462-464
pubmed: 32450761
JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2121-9
pubmed: 23695482
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2403-2404
pubmed: 32458121
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;275(3):679-690
pubmed: 29255970
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e438-e440
pubmed: 32407672