Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Recommendations in Response to COVID-19.
Journal
Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
22
03
2020
revised:
24
03
2020
accepted:
24
03
2020
entrez:
4
11
2020
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
5
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During a global pandemic, the benefit of routine visits and treatment of patients with cancer must be weighed against the risks to patients, staff, and society. Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers radiation oncology departments treat, and efficient resource utilization is essential in the setting of a pandemic. Herein, we aim to establish recommendations and a framework by which to evaluate prostate radiation therapy management decisions. Radiation oncologists from the United States and the United Kingdom rapidly conducted a systematic review and agreed upon recommendations to safely manage patients with prostate cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. A RADS framework was created: remote visits, and avoidance, deferment, and shortening of radiation therapy was applied to determine appropriate approaches. Recommendations were provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group regarding clinical node-positive, postprostatectomy, oligometastatic, and low-volume M1 disease. Across all prostate cancer stages, telemedicine consultations and return visits were recommended when resources/staff available. Delays in consultations and return visits of between 1 and 6 months were deemed safe based on stage of disease. Treatment can be avoided or delayed until safe for very low, low, and favorable intermediate-risk disease. Unfavorable intermediate-risk, high-risk, clinical node-positive, recurrence postsurgery, oligometastatic, and low-volume M1 disease can receive neoadjuvant hormone therapy for 4 to 6 months as necessary. Ultrahypofractionation is preferred for localized, oligometastatic, and low-volume M1, and moderate hypofractionation is preferred for postprostatectomy and clinical node positive disease. Salvage is preferred to adjuvant radiation. Resources can be reduced for all identified stages of prostate cancer. The RADS (remote visits, and avoidance, deferment, and shortening of radiation therapy) framework can be applied to other disease sites to help with decision making in a global pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33145460
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.003
pii: S2452-1094(20)30275-X
pmc: PMC7598436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
26-32Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-395
pubmed: 31227373
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-285
pubmed: 28262473
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1871-6
pubmed: 15540741
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jun 1;107(2):288-296
pubmed: 31987961
Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8
pubmed: 19091394
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):341-348
pubmed: 27598804
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):272-7
pubmed: 25512465
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-1543
pubmed: 31540791
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):332-9
pubmed: 25534388
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-2366
pubmed: 30355464
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):335-337
pubmed: 32066541
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5):479-505
pubmed: 31085757
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567
pubmed: 32182409