A novel measure for characterizing ultrasound device use and wear.

machine maintenance machine replacement point‐of‐care ultrasound ultrasound equipment safety ultrasound upgrade

Journal

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open
ISSN: 2688-1152
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764779

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 21 12 2019
revised: 22 02 2020
accepted: 25 02 2020
entrez: 4 11 2020
pubmed: 5 11 2020
medline: 5 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) equipment management is critical in optimizing daily clinical operations in emergency departments (EDs). Traditional consultative ultrasound laboratories are well practiced at operations management, but this is not the case for POCUS programs, because machine upgrade and replacement metrics have not been developed or tested. We present a data-driven method for assessment of POCUS equipment maintenance and replacement named the ULTrA (a data-driven approach to point-of-care ultrasound upgrade) score. This novel model of assessing each ultrasound machine by quantitative scoring in each of four mostly objective categories: use (U), likeability (L), trustworthiness (Tr), and age (A). We propose the ULTrA model as a method to identify underperforming devices which could be upgraded or eliminated, and to compare relative performance amongst a group of departmental ultrasound machines. This composite score may be a useful objective tool that could replace individual proxies for clinical effectiveness, such as age, use, or individual provider preference. Additional research in multiple centers would be needed to refine and validate the ULTrA score. Once fully developed, the ULTrA score could be deployed in EDs and other clinical settings where POCUS is used to help streamline resources to maintain a functional and state-of-the-art fleet of ultrasound machines over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33145533
doi: 10.1002/emp2.12051
pii: EMP212051
pmc: PMC7593474
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

865-870

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1295-1301
pubmed: 28212836
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:792-5
pubmed: 19963733
Insights Imaging. 2014 Oct;5(5):543-6
pubmed: 25230589
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 15;20(1):227
pubmed: 27523885
J Hosp Med. 2014 Sep;9(9):594-7
pubmed: 24891227
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 11;15:36
pubmed: 26655376
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;72(4):e45-e47
pubmed: 30236343
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):843-52
pubmed: 25176151
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Dec;30(12):1565-644
pubmed: 15617829

Auteurs

Hamid Shokoohi (H)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Andrew Goldsmith (A)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Kay Negishi (K)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Jeffrey R Herrala (JR)

Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.

Eden Diamond (E)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Sigmund Kharasch (S)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Michael Blaivas (M)

St. Francis Hospital University of South Carolina School of Medicine Columbus Georgia.

Andrew S Liteplo (AS)

Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts Boston USA.

Classifications MeSH