A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding safety and tolerability study of the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes.
Adolescent
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
C-Peptide
/ metabolism
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections
/ chemically induced
Female
Humans
Insulin Secretion
Insulin-Secreting Cells
/ metabolism
Latent Infection
/ chemically induced
Male
Single-Blind Method
Young Adult
Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody
Autoreactive T cell
Epstein–Barr virus reactivation
Islet autoimmunity
Type 1 diabetes
Journal
Diabetologia
ISSN: 1432-0428
Titre abrégé: Diabetologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0006777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
14
05
2020
accepted:
09
09
2020
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
21
1
2022
entrez:
4
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. In this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16-27 years old, <32 days from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes) were scheduled to receive placebo or otelixizumab in one of four dose cohorts (cumulative i.v. dose 9, 18, 27 or 36 mg over 6 days; planned n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses. Thirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC A metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817. The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Graphical abstract.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33145642
doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05317-y
pii: 10.1007/s00125-020-05317-y
pmc: PMC7801303
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
C-Peptide
0
otelixizumab
I5HF2X04PB
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02000817']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
313-324Références
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):603-613
pubmed: 31180194
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 May;124(5):288-93
pubmed: 27023009
J Virol Methods. 2010 Mar;164(1-2):111-5
pubmed: 19931313
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9-16
pubmed: 24356592
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2746-54
pubmed: 25011949
Diabetologia. 2010 Apr;53(4):614-23
pubmed: 20225393
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;85(4):704-714
pubmed: 30566758
Sci Immunol. 2016 Nov;1(5):
pubmed: 28664195
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1286-1296
pubmed: 31533907
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):644-51
pubmed: 25583753
Endocr Connect. 2018 Jan;7(1):R38-R46
pubmed: 29191919
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):979-88
pubmed: 25998290
Diabetes. 2013 Nov;62(11):3766-74
pubmed: 23835333
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;50(11):1238-48
pubmed: 20147616
Am J Physiol. 1979 Sep;237(3):E214-23
pubmed: 382871
Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 Apr;13(4):243-56
pubmed: 23524461
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 30;346(22):1692-8
pubmed: 12037148
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2598-608
pubmed: 15972866
Diabet Med. 2014 Apr;31(4):399-402
pubmed: 24236828
Clin Chem. 1997 Dec;43(12):2353-7
pubmed: 9439454
Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115(6):1145-55
pubmed: 20007541
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Sep;17(5):819-34
pubmed: 24083163
Islets. 2011 Jul-Aug;3(4):131-8
pubmed: 21606672
Diabetes. 2005 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S32-9
pubmed: 16306337