Race and Gender-Based Perceptions of Older Adults: Will the Youth Lead the Way?


Journal

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
ISSN: 2196-8837
Titre abrégé: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101628476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 29 06 2020
accepted: 20 10 2020
revised: 13 09 2020
pubmed: 5 11 2020
medline: 1 2 2022
entrez: 4 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Older individuals encounter the greatest racial/gender biases. It is unknown whether younger generations, who often lead culture shifts, have racial and gender biases against older populations. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk's crowdsourcing, we identified how an individual's race and gender are associated with perceptions of individuals aged mid-60s. Participants were asked to rate photograph appearances on Likert Scale (1-10). Interactions between participant and photograph race and gender were assessed with mixed effects models. Delta represents rating differences (positive value higher rating for Whites or women, negative value higher rating for African-Americans or men). Among 1563 participants (mean 35 years ± 12), both non-Hispanic White (WP) and all Other race/ethnicity (OP) participants perceived African-American photos as more trustworthy [Delta WP -0.60(95%CI-0.83, - 0.37); Delta OP - 0.51(- 0.74,-0.28), interaction p = 0.06], more attractive [Delta non-Hispanic White participants - 0.63(- 0.97, - 0.29); Delta Other race/ethnicity participants - 0.40 (- 0.74, - 0.28), interaction p < 0.001], healthier [Delta WP -0.31(- 0.53, - 0.08); Delta OP -0.24(- 0.45, -0.03), interaction p = 1.00], and less threatening than White photos [Delta WP 0.79(0.36,1.22); Delta OP 0.60(0.17,1.03), interaction p < 0.001]. Compared with OP, WP perceived African-American photos more favorably for intelligence (interaction p < 0.001). Both genders perceived photos of women as more trustworthy [Delta Women Participants (WmP) 0.50(0.27,0.73); Delta Men Participants(MnP) 0.31(0.08,0.54); interaction p < 0.001] and men as more threatening [Delta WmP -0.84(-1.27, -0.41), Delta MnP - 0.77(- 1.20, - 0.34), interaction p = 0.93]. Compared with MnP, WmP perceived photos of women as happier and more attractive than men (interaction p < 0.001). Compared with WmP, MnP perceived men as healthier than women (interaction p < 0.001). Among a young generation, older African-Americans were perceived more favorably than Whites. Gender perceptions followed gender norms. This suggests a decline in implicit bias against older minorities, but gender biases persist. Future work should investigate whether similar patterns are observed in healthcare.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Older individuals encounter the greatest racial/gender biases. It is unknown whether younger generations, who often lead culture shifts, have racial and gender biases against older populations.
METHODS
Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk's crowdsourcing, we identified how an individual's race and gender are associated with perceptions of individuals aged mid-60s. Participants were asked to rate photograph appearances on Likert Scale (1-10). Interactions between participant and photograph race and gender were assessed with mixed effects models. Delta represents rating differences (positive value higher rating for Whites or women, negative value higher rating for African-Americans or men).
RESULTS
Among 1563 participants (mean 35 years ± 12), both non-Hispanic White (WP) and all Other race/ethnicity (OP) participants perceived African-American photos as more trustworthy [Delta WP -0.60(95%CI-0.83, - 0.37); Delta OP - 0.51(- 0.74,-0.28), interaction p = 0.06], more attractive [Delta non-Hispanic White participants - 0.63(- 0.97, - 0.29); Delta Other race/ethnicity participants - 0.40 (- 0.74, - 0.28), interaction p < 0.001], healthier [Delta WP -0.31(- 0.53, - 0.08); Delta OP -0.24(- 0.45, -0.03), interaction p = 1.00], and less threatening than White photos [Delta WP 0.79(0.36,1.22); Delta OP 0.60(0.17,1.03), interaction p < 0.001]. Compared with OP, WP perceived African-American photos more favorably for intelligence (interaction p < 0.001). Both genders perceived photos of women as more trustworthy [Delta Women Participants (WmP) 0.50(0.27,0.73); Delta Men Participants(MnP) 0.31(0.08,0.54); interaction p < 0.001] and men as more threatening [Delta WmP -0.84(-1.27, -0.41), Delta MnP - 0.77(- 1.20, - 0.34), interaction p = 0.93]. Compared with MnP, WmP perceived photos of women as happier and more attractive than men (interaction p < 0.001). Compared with WmP, MnP perceived men as healthier than women (interaction p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Among a young generation, older African-Americans were perceived more favorably than Whites. Gender perceptions followed gender norms. This suggests a decline in implicit bias against older minorities, but gender biases persist. Future work should investigate whether similar patterns are observed in healthcare.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33145664
doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00903-7
pii: 10.1007/s40615-020-00903-7
pmc: PMC8089121
mid: NIHMS1643789
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1415-1423

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K01 HL142848
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : L30 HL148881
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R25 HL108837
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM122557
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2020. W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute.

Références

Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):979-87
pubmed: 22420787
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 26;6(26):eaba7814
pubmed: 32637616
Hosp Health Netw. 2016 Nov;90(11):22-4, 26-7
pubmed: 30005534
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2286-92
pubmed: 22147855
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Dec;5(6):1215-1229
pubmed: 29508374
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011044
pubmed: 32692370
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):43-52
pubmed: 23319505
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e60-76
pubmed: 26469668
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 11;39(37):7228-7243
pubmed: 31371423
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):59-80
pubmed: 28287752
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jun;30(6):758-67
pubmed: 25623298
Psychol Aging. 2014 Sep;29(3):469-81
pubmed: 25244468
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Jun;56(6):721-8
pubmed: 15939950
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013592
pubmed: 31707940
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19
pubmed: 28249596
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3):
pubmed: 27496360
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1122-1135
pubmed: 25582810

Auteurs

Sade Solola (S)

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Luis Luy (L)

University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Kathryn Herrera-Theut (K)

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Leanne Zabala (L)

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Elmira Torabzadeh (E)

Statistics Consulting Lab, Bio5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Edward J Bedrick (EJ)

Statistics Consulting Lab, Bio5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Erika Yee (E)

Sarver Heart Center, Clinical Research Office, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Ashley Larsen (A)

Sarver Heart Center, Clinical Research Office, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Jeff Stone (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Marylyn McEwen (M)

Department of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Elizabeth Calhoun (E)

Center for Population Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Janice D Crist (JD)

Department of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Megan Hebdon (M)

Department of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Natalie Pool (N)

Department of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Molly Carnes (M)

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Nancy Sweitzer (N)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245046, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.

Khadijah Breathett (K)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245046, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA. kbreathett@shc.arizona.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH