High-quality brain perfusion SPECT images may be achieved with a high-speed recording using 360° CZT camera.

Brain perfusion CZT Count sensitivity Image quality SPECT

Journal

EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
accepted: 19 10 2020
entrez: 4 11 2020
pubmed: 5 11 2020
medline: 5 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare brain perfusion SPECT obtained from a 360° CZT and a conventional Anger camera. The 360° CZT camera utilizing a brain configuration, with 12 detectors surrounding the head, was compared to a 2-head Anger camera for count sensitivity and image quality on 30-min SPECT recordings from a brain phantom and from The CZT camera provided more than 2-fold increase in count sensitivity, as compared with the Anger camera, as well as (1) lower sharpness indexes, giving evidence of higher spatial resolution, for both peripheral/central brain structures, with respective median values of 5.2%/3.7% versus 2.4%/1.9% for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.01), and 8.0%/6.9% versus 6.2%/3.7% on phantom; and (2) higher gray/white matter contrast on peripheral/central structures, with respective ratio median values of 1.56/1.35 versus 1.11/1.20 for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.05), and 2.57/2.17 versus 1.40/1.12 on phantom; and (3) no change in noise level. Image quality, scored visually by experienced physicians, was also significantly higher on CZT than on the Anger camera (+ 80%, p < 0.01), and all these results were unchanged on the CZT images obtained with only a 15 min recording time. The 360° CZT camera provides brain perfusion images of much higher quality than a conventional Anger camera, even with high-speed recordings, thus demonstrating the potential for repositioning brain perfusion SPECT to the forefront of brain imaging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33146804
doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00334-7
pii: 10.1186/s40658-020-00334-7
pmc: PMC7642149
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

65

Références

Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Jan;8(1):82-92
pubmed: 21274688
Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Aug;37(8):e211-2
pubmed: 22785531
Ann Nucl Med. 2015 Oct;29(8):682-96
pubmed: 26099507
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Apr;26(2):453-455
pubmed: 28744820
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Dec;51(4):331-337
pubmed: 29242727
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2018 Jan 30;271:43-49
pubmed: 29129545
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 May;30(5):876-84
pubmed: 19246526
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;47(2):180-181
pubmed: 31786238
Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 15;78(16):4786-4789
pubmed: 29959149
Age Ageing. 1999 Jul;28(4):385-91
pubmed: 10459793
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 May;47(5):1329-1331
pubmed: 31606830
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Mar 14;5(1):6
pubmed: 29536291
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):1261-1269
pubmed: 30963419
J Cardiol. 2017 Feb;69(2):449-455
pubmed: 27021428
J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):245-251
pubmed: 27510176
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(8):1672-1677
pubmed: 31044266
Semin Neurol. 2017 Oct;37(5):510-537
pubmed: 29207412
Clin Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;44(7):568-569
pubmed: 30932983
Clin Nucl Med. 2006 Jul;31(7):376-8
pubmed: 16785801
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Dec;45(13):2338-2341
pubmed: 30269156
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Dec;36(12):2103-10
pubmed: 19838705
Circ J. 2016;80(3):689-95
pubmed: 26781361
EJNMMI Phys. 2014 Dec;1(1):97
pubmed: 26501455
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2018 Jan - Feb;174(1-2):16-27
pubmed: 28595975
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Apr;26(2):443-452
pubmed: 28623525
J Neurol. 2015 May;262(5):1120-9
pubmed: 25794857
EJNMMI Res. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):61
pubmed: 31300962
Ann Nucl Med. 2015 May;29(4):342-50
pubmed: 25628019
EJNMMI Res. 2015 Dec;5(1):63
pubmed: 26566952
J Nucl Med. 2012 Dec;53(12):1897-903
pubmed: 23139084
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1313-1322
pubmed: 29327252
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Dec;108(10):1782-9
pubmed: 25308754
Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):11-6
pubmed: 22956363
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Dec;36(12):2093-102
pubmed: 19838703
J Nucl Med. 2004 Apr;45(4):594-607
pubmed: 15073255
J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):1374-1377
pubmed: 27194010

Auteurs

Manon Bordonne (M)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Médecine Nucléaire, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Allée du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-, Nancy, France.

Mohammad B Chawki (MB)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Pierre-Yves Marie (PY)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, INSERM, UMR-1116 DCAC, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Timothée Zaragori (T)

Université de Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Véronique Roch (V)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Rachel Grignon (R)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Laetitia Imbert (L)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France. l.imbert@chru-nancy.fr.
Médecine Nucléaire, CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Allée du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-, Nancy, France. l.imbert@chru-nancy.fr.
Université de Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, F-54000, Nancy, France. l.imbert@chru-nancy.fr.

Antoine Verger (A)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, F-54000, Nancy, France.

Classifications MeSH