Are Turkeys (
Meleagris gallopavo
bedding
floor
ground
litter
operant methods
preference
rubber mats
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2020
02 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
20
10
2020
revised:
26
10
2020
accepted:
29
10
2020
entrez:
5
11
2020
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The soiling of bedding on modern turkey farms combined with turkeys' reduced ability and opportunity to perch and roost at elevation, forces them to spend most, if not all, of their time in contact with their excreta. To determine turkeys' perspective on these conditions and the value they place on unsoiled bedding vs. soiled litter (collectively, substrates), we used twenty-four eleven-week-old turkey hens divided into six two-compartment pens. In the "home" compartment (H), we placed soiled wood shavings, while the "treatment" compartment (T) contained no substrate (NS), fresh pine and spruce wood shavings (FP), soiled pine and spruce wood shavings (SP), ammonia reductant-treated soiled pine and spruce wood shavings (TSP), or a feed treatment. One-way push-doors separated the two compartments. The door leading to T weighed an additional 0%, 20% or 40% of the turkeys' body weight while the door to H remained unweighted. All birds were exposed to each resource and door weight combination in a systematic order. We measured the turkeys' motivation based on the number of birds that pushed the maximum weight to access each resource, the amount of time spent in T, and the number of visits to T. Our findings show that turkeys worked harder to access feed compared to all the floor substrate treatments. Additionally, they were equally motivated to access all the substrate treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33147707
pii: ani10112015
doi: 10.3390/ani10112015
pmc: PMC7692265
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Behav Processes. 2004 Sep 30;67(2):121-30
pubmed: 15240050
Br Poult Sci. 2003 Sep;44(4):538-44
pubmed: 14584843
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jun 12;7:332
pubmed: 32596273
Br Poult Sci. 1999 Jul;40(3):323-31
pubmed: 10475628
Vet Rec. 2006 May 20;158(20):679-82
pubmed: 16714430
Poult Sci. 2018 Nov 1;97(11):3884-3890
pubmed: 30107574
Poult Sci. 2011 Apr;90(4):775-80
pubmed: 21406362
Br Poult Sci. 2001 May;42(2):161-70
pubmed: 11421323
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 16;10(6):
pubmed: 32560113
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 May 5;68(1):39-53
pubmed: 10771314
Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):743-748
pubmed: 29272459
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:766-776
pubmed: 27110988
Animal. 2019 Feb;13(2):367-373
pubmed: 29804554
Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1171-91
pubmed: 9236014
Behav Processes. 1993 Feb;28(3):209-20
pubmed: 24897606
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1988 Oct;35(8):579-93
pubmed: 3057770
Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;89(8):1584-9
pubmed: 20634510
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412
pubmed: 20613859
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 08;10(7):
pubmed: 32650501
Anim Behav. 1972 Nov;20(4):775-7
pubmed: 4661320
Animals (Basel). 2013 Jul 09;3(3):608-28
pubmed: 26479524
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1997 May;(23):110-2
pubmed: 9354303
Physiol Behav. 1997 Aug;62(2):413-9
pubmed: 9251988
Br Poult Sci. 2015;56(5):511-21
pubmed: 26248066
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Aug;33(3):427-34
pubmed: 11591075
Avian Dis. 2011 Mar;55(1):51-8
pubmed: 21500636