Intensive care units follow-up: a scoping review protocol.
health services administration & management
intensive & critical care
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 11 2020
04 11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
5
11
2020
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
24
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increasing numbers of patients are surviving critical illness, leading to growing concern about the potential impact of the long-term consequences of intensive care on patients, families and society as a whole. These long-term effects are together known as postintensive care syndrome and their presence can be evaluated at intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up consultations. However, the services provided by these consultations vary across hospitals and units, in part because there is no validated standard model to evaluate patients and their quality of life after ICU discharge. We describe a protocol for a scoping review focusing on models of ICU follow-up and the impact of such strategies on improving patient quality of life. In this scoping review, we will search the literature systematically using electronic databases (MEDLINE - from database inception to June 15th 2020) and a grey literature search. We will involve stakeholders as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach developed by Peters This study does not require ethics approval, because data will be obtained through a review of published primary studies. The results of our evaluation will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will also be disseminated through presentations at national and international conferences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33148730
pii: bmjopen-2020-037725
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037725
pmc: PMC7643502
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e037725Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2003-2009
pubmed: 27171492
Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):763-75
pubmed: 25731633
Respir Care. 2017 Jan;62(1):113-122
pubmed: 27803355
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):368-77
pubmed: 12536269
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6
pubmed: 26134548
Clin Nurse Spec. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):227-37
pubmed: 27309787
J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):589-98
pubmed: 25703957
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):708-11
pubmed: 25619483
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 23;7:116
pubmed: 17645791
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jan;25(1-2):20-37
pubmed: 26420520
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):642-53
pubmed: 25513784
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):348-56
pubmed: 22875380
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1554-61
pubmed: 20473149
Intensive Care Med. 2009 May;35(5):796-809
pubmed: 19165464
Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):611-20
pubmed: 15803303
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 02;11:CD012701
pubmed: 30388297
Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2518-26
pubmed: 25083984
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1393-1401
pubmed: 29787415
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108
pubmed: 19490148
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):339-47
pubmed: 22875379
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Apr;15(3):243-52
pubmed: 23535984
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9
pubmed: 21946660
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 May;2(5):369-79
pubmed: 24815803
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Nov - Dec;43:23-29
pubmed: 27796253
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 3;23(1):241
pubmed: 31269976
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;36(6):943-58
pubmed: 26595053
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):223-225
pubmed: 27695897
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2506-7
pubmed: 22809925
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):401-410
pubmed: 26694189