UNEXPLAINED VISUAL LOSS AFTER GAS TAMPONADE FOR MACULA-ON RETINAL DETACHMENT: Incidence and Clinical Characterization.
Adult
Blindness
/ diagnosis
Endotamponade
/ adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Italy
/ epidemiology
Macula Lutea
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Retinal Detachment
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Silicone Oils
/ adverse effects
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Visual Acuity
Vitrectomy
/ adverse effects
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
5
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify the incidence rate and the clinical characteristics of unexplained visual loss after gas tamponade for primary macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retrospective longitudinal analysis of all subjects undergoing vitrectomy with gas for primary macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment from 2010 to 2019. Outcome was the unexplained visual loss evaluated after gas absorption, defined as a loss of vision to less than 20/200 without evident causes. The diagnostic workup was reviewed. Nine eyes with unexplained visual loss of 357 surgeries were found. The incidence proportion was 2.52 new cases every 1,000 eyes affected by macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with gas per year. All subjects had an absolute central scotoma, with a median postoperative visual acuity of 20/1,600 (counting fingers). Structural findings were consistent with an axonal damage; all eyes had microcystoid macular edema and reduced thickness of both macular ganglion cell and retinal nerve fiber layers. No photoreceptor structural damages were noted. The incidence of unexplained visual loss after gas tamponade for primary macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is 2.52 new cases every 1,000 eyes per year. This rare complication, which findings are suggestive of an axonal damage within retinal ganglion cells, remains a serious and unexplained concern for vitreoretinal surgeons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33149095
pii: 00006982-202105000-00009
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Silicone Oils
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
957-964Références
Ohji M. Unexpected complications related to tamponade after vitrectomy. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;254:1463–1464.
Scheerlinck LM, Schellekens PA, Liem AT, et al. INCIDENCE, risk factors, and clinical characteristics OF unexplained visual loss after intraocular silicone oil for macula-on retinal detachment. Retina 2016;36:342–350.
Marti M, Walton R, al BöniCe. Increased intraocular pressure is a risk factor for unexplained visual loss during silicone oil endotamponade. Retina 2017;37:2334–2340.
Scheerlinck LME, Kuiper JJW, Liem ATA, et al. Electrolyte composition of retro-oil fluid and silicone oil-related visual loss. Acta Ophthalmol 2016;94:449–453.
Roca JA, Wu L, Berrocal M, et al. Un-explained visual loss following silicone oil removal: results of the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study (PACORES) Group. Int J Retina Vitreous 2017;3:26.
Moya R, Chandra A, Banerjee PJ, et al. The incidence of unexplained visual loss following removal of silicone oil. Eye 2015;29:1477–1482.
Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Visual field loss after pars plana vitrectomy with air/fluid exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:386–388.
Kokame GT. Visual field defects after vitrectomy with fluid-air exchange. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:653–654.
Cazaban S, Groenewald C, Pearce IA, Wong D. Visual loss following removal of intraocular silicone oil. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:799–802.
Winter M, Eberhardt W, Scholz C, Reichenbach A. Failure of potassium siphoning by Müller cells: a new hypothesis of perfluorocarbon liquid-induced retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:256–261.
Newsom RSB, Johnston R, Sullivan PM, et al. Sudden visual loss after removal of silicone oil. Retina 2004;24:871–877.
Herbert EN, Liew SH, Williamson TH. Visual loss after silicone oil removal. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1667–1668.
Williams PD, Fuller CG, Scott IU, et al. Vision loss associated with the use and removal of intraocular silicone oil. Clin Ophthalmol 2008;2:955–959.
Refojo MF, Leong FL, Chung H, et al. Extraction of retinol and cholesterol by intraocular silicone oils. Ophthalmology 1988;95:614–618.
Herbert EN, Habib M, Steel D, Williamson TH. Central scotoma associated with intraocular silicone oil tamponade develops before oil removal. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:248–252.
Dogramaci M, Williams K, Lee E, Williamson TH. Foveal light exposure is increased at the time of removal of silicone oil with the potential for phototoxicity. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251:35–39.
Asaria RHY, Kon CH, Bunce C, et al. Silicone oil concentrates fibrogenic growth factors in the retro-oil fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1439–1442.
Yonemura N, Hirata A, Hasumura T, et al. Long-term alteration in the air-infused rabbit retina. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:314–320.
Hasumura T, Yonemura N, Hirata A, et al. Retinal damage by air infusion during vitrectomy in rabbit eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:4300–4304.
Hirata A, Yonemura N, Hasumura T, et al. Effect of infusion air pressure on visual field defects after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:611–616.
Christensen UC, La Cour M. Visual loss after use of intraocular silicone oil associated with thinning of inner retinal layers. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:733–737.
Shoji T, Nagaoka Y, Sato H, Chihara E. Impact of high myopia on the performance of SD-OCT parameters to detect glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:1843–1849.
Choi YJ, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim DM. Glaucoma detection ability of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in high myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:2296–2304.
Caramoy A, Droege KM, Kirchhof B, Fauser S. Retinal layers measurements in healthy eyes and in eyes receiving silicone oil-based endotamponade. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:e292–297.
Ohji M, Nao-I N, Saito Y, et al. Prevention of visual field defect after macular hole surgery by passing air used for fluid-air exchange through water. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:62–66.
Ma Y, Zhu XQ, Peng XY. Macular perfusion changes and ganglion cell complex loss in patients with silicone oil-related visual loss. Biomed Environ Sci 2020;33:151–157.
Govetto A, Su D, Farajzadeh M, et al. Microcystoid macular changes in association with idiopathic epiretinal membranes in eyes with and without glaucoma: clinical insights. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;181:156–165.
Abegg M, Dysli M, Wolf S, et al. Microcystic macular edema: retrograde maculopathy caused by optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 2014;121:142–149.
Burggraaff MC, Trieu J, de Vries-Knoppert WAEJ, et al. The clinical spectrum of microcystic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:952–961.
Borowicz D, Nowomiejska K, Nowakowska D, et al. Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19:118.