Identifying priority landscapes for conservation of snow leopards in Pakistan.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2020
accepted:
19
10
2020
entrez:
5
11
2020
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pakistan's total estimated snow leopard habitat is about 80,000 km2 of which about half is considered prime habitat. However, this preliminary demarcation was not always in close agreement with the actual distribution-the discrepancy may be huge at the local and regional level. Recent technological developments like camera trapping and molecular genetics allow for collecting reliable presence records that could be used to construct realistic species distribution based on empirical data and advanced mathematical approaches like MaxEnt. The current study followed this approach to construct an accurate distribution of the species in Pakistan. Moreover, movement corridors, among different landscapes, were also identified through circuit theory. The probability of habitat suitability, generated from 98 presence points and 11 environmental variables, scored the snow leopard's assumed range in Pakistan, from 0 to 0.97. A large portion of the known range represented low-quality habitat, including areas in lower Chitral, Swat, Astore, and Kashmir. Conversely, Khunjerab, Misgar, Chapursan, Qurumber, Broghil, and Central Karakoram represented high-quality habitats. Variables with higher contributions in the MaxEnt model were precipitation during the driest month (34%), annual mean temperature (19.5%), mean diurnal range of temperature (9.8%), annual precipitation (9.4%), and river density (9.2). The model was validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots and defined thresholds. The average test AUC in Maxent for the replicate runs was 0.933 while the value of AUC by ROC curve calculated at 0.15 threshold was 1.00. These validation tests suggested a good model fit and strong predictive power. The connectivity analysis revealed that the population in the Hindukush landscape appears to be more connected with the population in Afghanistan as compared to other populations in Pakistan. Similarly, the Pamir-Karakoram population is better connected with China and Tajikistan, while the Himalayan population was connected with the population in India. Based on our findings we propose three model landscapes to be considered under the Global Snow Leopard Ecosystem Protection Program (GSLEP) agenda as regional priority areas, to safeguard the future of the snow leopard in Pakistan and the region. These landscapes fall within mountain ranges of the Himalaya, Hindu Kush and Karakoram-Pamir, respectively. We also identified gaps in the existing protected areas network and suggest new protected areas in Chitral and Gilgit-Baltistan to protect critical habitats of snow leopard in Pakistan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33151925
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228832
pii: PONE-D-20-02039
pmc: PMC7644022
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0228832Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ecology. 2008 Oct;89(10):2712-24
pubmed: 18959309
Science. 2006 Sep 1;313(5791):1284-6
pubmed: 16946070
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55158
pubmed: 23457462
Landsc Ecol. 2015;30(3):517-534
pubmed: 26120251
Ecol Evol. 2016 May 18;6(12):4065-75
pubmed: 27516864
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187027
pubmed: 29121089
Am Nat. 2001 Jul;158(1):87-99
pubmed: 18707317
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1951-65
pubmed: 22250784
PeerJ. 2017 Dec 5;5:e4095
pubmed: 29230356
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 23;11(1):13104
pubmed: 34162926
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 02;9(9):e106405
pubmed: 25180515
PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e97122
pubmed: 24818607
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32104
pubmed: 22393381
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 22;272(1575):1885-91
pubmed: 16191593
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e105086
pubmed: 25133757
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19885-90
pubmed: 18056641
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):274-81
pubmed: 23379623
Ecol Lett. 2005 Sep;8(9):993-1009
pubmed: 34517687
Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):836-51
pubmed: 18544090
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32202
pubmed: 22359670
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Zool Res. 2018 Nov 18;39(6):373-386
pubmed: 29872029