Scale Banking for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures That Measure Functioning in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Daily Activities Metric.
Journal
Arthritis care & research
ISSN: 2151-4658
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
19
10
2020
received:
07
04
2020
accepted:
03
11
2020
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
6
5
2022
entrez:
5
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Functioning is an important outcome for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Heterogeneity of respective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) challenges direct comparisons between their results. This study aimed to standardize reporting of such PROMs measuring functioning in RA to facilitate comparability. Common-item nonequivalent group design with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) as a common scale across data sets from various countries (including the UK, Turkey, and Germany) to establish a common metric was used. Other PROMs included are the physical function items of the Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II), the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey, and 4 short forms (20, 10, 6, and 4 physical function items) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. As the HAQ includes mobility, self-care, and domestic life items, this study focuses on these 3 domains. PROMs were described using standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD). A Rasch measurement model was used to create the common metric. The range of the SEM was 0.2 (MDHAQ) to 7.4 (SF-36 health survey physical functioning domain). The SDD revealed a range from 9.7% (WOMAC rating scale) to 33.5% (WHODAS physical functioning domain). PROMs co-calibration revealed fit to the Rasch measurement model. A transformation table was developed to allow exchange between PROM scores. Scores between the daily activity PROMs commonly used in RA can now be compared. Factors such as SEM and SDD help to determine the choice of a PROM in clinical practice and research.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
579-587Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Stack RJ, van Tuyl LH, Sloots M, van de Stadt LA, Hoogland W, Maat B, et al. Symptom complexes in patients with seropositive arthralgia and in patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative exploration of symptom development. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:1646-53.
Sverker A, Östlund G, Thyberg M, Thyberg I, Valtersson E, Björk M. Dilemmas of participation in everyday life in early rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative interview study (the Swedish TIRA Project). Disabil Rehabil 2014;37:1251-9.
Nicassio PM, Kay MA, Custodio MK, Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Weisman MH. An evaluation of a biopsychosocial framework for health-related quality of life and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Psychosom Res 2011;71:79-85.
Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R84.
Gilworth G, Chamberlain MA, Harvey A, Woodhouse A, Smith J, Smyth MG, et al. Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:349-54.
Carr A, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Mitchell H, Ryan S, Carr M, et al. Rheumatology outcomes: the patient's perspective. J Rheumatol 2003;30:880-3.
Kalyoncu U, Dougados M, Daurès J, Gossec L. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:183-90.
Heller J, Shadick NA. Outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: incorporating the patient perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007;19:101-5.
Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137-45.
WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
McCollum L, Pincus T. A biopsychosocial model to complement a biomedical model: patient questionnaire data and socioeconomic status usually are more significant than laboratory tests and imaging studies in prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2009;35:699-712.
Stucki G, Cieza A, Geyh S, Battistella L, Lloyd J, Symmons D, et al. ICF core sets for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rehabil Med 2004 Suppl 44:87-93.
Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Dencker A, Palstam A, Person G, Horton MC, Escorpizo R, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in osteoarthritis: a systematic search and review of their use and psychometric properties. RMD Open 2018;4:e000715.
Grimby G, Tennant A, Tesio L. The use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice? J Rehabil Med 2012;44:97-8.
ISO. Health informatics - capacity-based eHealth architecture roadmap - part 2: architectural components and maturity model. PD ISO/TR 14639-2:2014. UK: International Standard Organisation; 2014.
Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G, Cieza A, Üstün TB. Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: requirements and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2016;21:223-8.
Andrich D. The polytomous Rasch model and the equating of two instruments. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch models in health. London: Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education; 2013. p. 164-96.
Hurst N, Jobanputra P, Hunter M, Lambert M, Lochhead A, Brown H, for the Economic and Health Outcomes Research Group. Validity of EuroQoL-a generic health status instrument-in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33:655-62.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-70.
De Jong Z, van Der Heijde D, McKenna SP, Whalley D. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:878-83.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, Gandek B. How to score version 2 of the SF-36® Health Survey. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric; 2000.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davis A, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-8.
Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F. Toward a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2220-30.
Bellamy N. The WOMAC knee and hip osteoarthritis indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN hand OA indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:S148.
World Health Organization. WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. URL: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/index.html.
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179-94.
Barber CE, Zell J, Yazdany J, Davis AM, Cappelli L, Ehrlich-Jones L, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology recommended patient-reported functional status assessment measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;71:1531-9.
Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:149-74.
Hagquist C, Andrich D. Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15:181.
Marais I, Andrich D. Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas 2008;9:200-15.
Rouquette A, Hardouin JB, Vanhaesebrouck A, Sébille V, Coste J. Differential item functioning (DIF) in composite health measurement scale: recommendations for characterizing DIF with meaningful consequences within the Rasch model framework. PLoS One 2019;14:e0215073.
Andersen EB. Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika 1977;42:69-81.
Cook KF, Schalet BD, Kallen MA, Rutsohn JP, Cella D. Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI pain interference and SF-36 bodily pain subscale scores to the PROMIS pain interference metric. Qual Life Res 2015;24:2305-18.
Oude Vsohaar MA, Vonkeman HE, Courvoisier D, Finckh A, Gossec L, Leung YY, et al. Towards standardized patient reported physical function outcome reporting: linking ten commonly used questionnaires to a common metric. Qual Life Res 2019;28:187-97.
Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1988.
Fellinghauer C, Prodinger B, Tennant A. The impact of missing values and single imputation upon Rasch analysis outcomes: a simulation study. J Appl Meas 2018;19:1-25.