ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer.
AUC
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
Endometrial carcinoma
Imaging evaluation
Recurrence
Staging
Surveillance
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
27
08
2020
accepted:
01
09
2020
entrez:
6
11
2020
pubmed:
7
11
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To date, there is little consensus on the role of pelvic imaging in assessing local disease extent during initial staging in patients with endometrial carcinoma, with practices differing widely across centers. However, when pretreatment assessment of local tumor extent is indicated, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. Preoperative imaging of endometrial carcinoma can define the extent of disease and indicate the need for subspecialist referral in the presence of deep myometrial invasion, cervical extension, or suspected lymphadenopathy. If distant metastatic disease is clinically suspected, preoperative assessment with cross-sectional imaging or PET/CT may be performed. However, most patients with low-grade disease are at low risk of lymph node and distant metastases. Thus, this group may not require a routine pretreatment evaluation for distant metastases. Recurrence rates in patients with endometrial carcinoma are infrequent. Therefore, radiologic evaluation is typically used only to investigate suspicion of recurrent disease due to symptoms or physical examination and not for routine surveillance after treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33153558
pii: S1546-1440(20)30938-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Practice Guideline
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S472-S486Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.