Evolution of hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering of the knee: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.
Cartilage repair of knee
Clinical outcome
Hydrogels
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Journal
Joint bone spine
ISSN: 1778-7254
Titre abrégé: Joint Bone Spine
Pays: France
ID NLM: 100938016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
27
08
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
pubmed:
7
11
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
6
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent years, studies have boosted our knowledge about the biology and disorders of articular cartilage. In this regard, the design of hydrogel-based scaffolds has advanced to improve cartilage repair. However, the efficacy of knee cartilage repair using hydrogels remains unclear. The aim of systematic review and meta-analysis was to scrutinize the efficiency of hydrogel-based therapy in correcting cartilage defects of knee (femoral condyle, patella, tibia plateau and trochlea). The search was conducted in PubMed to gather articles published from 2004/1/1 to 2019/10/01, addressing the effects of implant of hydrogel on knee joint cartilage regeneration. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for estimating the risk of bias was applied to check the quality of articles. The clinical data for meta-analysis was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS), Lysholm score, WOMAC, and IKDC. The guidelines of Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions were utilized to conduct the review and meta-analysis in the RevMan 5.3 software. The search resulted in 50 clinical trials that included 2846 patients, 986 of whom received cell-based hydrogel implants while 1860 patients used hydrogel without cell. There were significant differences comparing the pain scores based on the VAS (MD: -2.97; 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.79, P<0.00001) and WOMAC (MD: -25.22; 95% CI: -31.22 to -19.22, P<0.00001) between pre- and post-treatment with hydrogels. Furthermore, there were significant improvements in the functional scores based on the IKDC total score (MD: 30.67; P<0.00001) and the Lysholm knee scale (MD: 29.26; 95% CI: 26.74 to 31.78, P<0.00001). According to the Lysholm and IKDC score and after cumulative functional analysis, there was a significant improvement in this parameter (MD: 29.25; 95% CI: 27.26 to 31.25, P<0.00001). This meta-analysis indicated clinically and statistically significant improvements in the pain score (VAS and WOMAC) and the functional score (IKDC and Lysholm) after the administration of hydrogel compared to pretreatment status. So, the current evidence shows the efficiency of hydrogel-based therapy in correcting and repairing knee cartilage defects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33157230
pii: S1297-319X(20)30203-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.105096
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrogels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105096Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.