Determinants of length of stay after cesarean sections in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 11 2020
06 11 2020
Historique:
received:
28
01
2020
accepted:
28
09
2020
entrez:
7
11
2020
pubmed:
8
11
2020
medline:
11
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since Italy has the highest cesarean section (CS) rate (38.1%) among all European countries, the containment of health care costs associated with CS is needed, along with control of length of hospital stay (LOS) following CS. This population based cross-sectional study aims to investigate LoS post CS (overall CS, OCS; planned CS, PCS; urgent/emergency CS, UCS), in Friuli Venezia Giulia (a region of North-Eastern Italy) during 2005-2015, adjusting for a considerable number factors, including various obstetric conditions/complications. Maternal and newborn characteristics (health care setting and timeframe; maternal health factors; child's size factors; child's fragility factors; socio-demographic background; obstetric history; obstetric conditions) were used as independent variables. LoS (post OCS, PCS, UCS) was the outcome measure. The statistical analysis was conducted with multivariable linear (LoS expressed as adjusted mean, in days) as well as logistic (adjusted proportion of LoS > 4 days vs. LoS ≤ 4 days, using a 4 day cutoff for early discharge, ED) regression. An important decreasing trend over time in mean LoS and LoS > ED was observed for both PCS and UCS. LoS post CS was shorter with parity and history of CS, whereas it was longer among non-EU mothers. Several obstetric conditions/complications were associated with extended LoS. Whilst eclampsia/pre-eclampsia and preterm gestations (33-36 weeks) were predominantly associated with longer LoS post UCS, for PCS LoS was significantly longer with birthweight 2.0-2.5 kg, multiple birth and increasing maternal age. Strong significant inter-hospital variation remained after adjustment for the major clinical conditions. This study shows that routinely collected administrative data provide useful information for health planning and monitoring, identifying inter-hospital differences that could be targeted by policy interventions aimed at improving the efficiency of obstetric care. The important decreasing trend over time of LoS post CS, coupled with the impact of some socio-demographic and obstetric history factors on LoS, seemingly suggests a positive approach of health care providers of FVG in decision making on hospitalization length post CS. However, the significant role of several obstetric conditions did not influence hospital variation. Inter-hospital variations of LoS could depend on a number of factors, including the capacity to discharge patients into the surrounding non-acute facilities. Further studies are warranted to ascertain whether LoS can be attributed to hospital efficiency rather than the characteristics of the hospital catchment area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33159096
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74161-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-74161-2
pmc: PMC7648096
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19238Références
Pediatrics. 2003 Feb;111(2):364-71
pubmed: 12563065
Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):e1-9
pubmed: 17606536
Ochsner J. 2015 Fall;15(3):228-36
pubmed: 26412993
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):331.e1-19
pubmed: 22464076
CMAJ Open. 2018 Jul 15;6(3):E261-E268
pubmed: 30012645
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):860-5
pubmed: 9351780
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):669-77
pubmed: 17329519
Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1058-65
pubmed: 10790463
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):927-34
pubmed: 23434021
Early Hum Dev. 2006 Feb;82(2):85-95
pubmed: 16459031
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E34-42
pubmed: 24525748
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):66
pubmed: 29523121
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):72-81; discussion 82
pubmed: 24102880
J Health Econ. 1999 Aug;18(4):473-90
pubmed: 10539618
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):205-11
pubmed: 9024115
Midwifery. 2018 May;60:36-40
pubmed: 29482175
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):154-60
pubmed: 16396873
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368
pubmed: 30322586
BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):807-13
pubmed: 15270928
PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 08;13(3):e1001972
pubmed: 26954561
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0204919
pubmed: 30605470
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):719-27
pubmed: 11533342
JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):348-54
pubmed: 24522747
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jul;32(9):825-32
pubmed: 25594218
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR140-4
pubmed: 15471778
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):926-31
pubmed: 20859157
BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):915-23
pubmed: 22568406
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018 Nov;64(11):1045-1049
pubmed: 30570059
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):380
pubmed: 31941963
Clin Perinatol. 1998 Jun;25(2):257-70
pubmed: 9646992
Midwifery. 2013 Feb;29(2):159-66
pubmed: 22342229
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93(11):1274-83
pubmed: 21114206
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Sep;51(3):353-61
pubmed: 20601901
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19442
pubmed: 31857615
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jan;29(1):25-30
pubmed: 19280491
Matern Child Health J. 2006 May;10(3):277-84
pubmed: 16382330
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):267-271
pubmed: 29733840
CMAJ. 2018 Jun 18;190(24):E734-E741
pubmed: 29914910
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 6;10(1):5912
pubmed: 32249795
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(7):1086-1094
pubmed: 30122116
CMAJ. 1998 Apr 7;158(7):875-80
pubmed: 9559012
BMJ. 2008 Oct 17;337:a1702
pubmed: 18930971
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;177(1):155-159
pubmed: 29116396