RICE ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN6 Affects Acyl-CoA Homeostasis and Growth in Rice.
Acyl-CoA esters
Acyl-CoA-binding protein
Jasmonic acid
Lipid metabolism
Peroxidases
Reactive oxygen species
Journal
Rice (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1939-8425
Titre abrégé: Rice (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101503136
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Nov 2020
06 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
13
07
2020
accepted:
21
10
2020
entrez:
7
11
2020
pubmed:
8
11
2020
medline:
8
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) esters are important intermediates in lipid metabolism with regulatory properties. Acyl-CoA-binding proteins bind and transport acyl-CoAs to fulfill these functions. RICE ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN6 (OsACBP6) is currently the only one peroxisome-localized plant ACBP that has been proposed to be involved in β-oxidation in transgenic Arabidopsis. The role of the peroxisomal ACBP (OsACBP6) in rice (Oryza sativa) was investigated. Here, we report on the function of OsACBP6 in rice. The osacbp6 mutant showed diminished growth with reduction in root meristem activity and leaf growth. Acyl-CoA profiling and lipidomic analysis revealed an increase in acyl-CoA content and a slight triacylglycerol accumulation caused by the loss of OsACBP6. Comparative transcriptomic analysis discerned the biological processes arising from the loss of OsACBP6. Reduced response to oxidative stress was represented by a decline in gene expression of a group of peroxidases and peroxidase activities. An elevation in hydrogen peroxide was observed in both roots and shoots/leaves of osacbp6. Taken together, loss of OsACBP6 not only resulted in a disruption of the acyl-CoA homeostasis but also peroxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis. In contrast, osacbp6-complemented transgenic rice displayed similar phenotype to the wild type rice, supporting a role for OsACBP6 in the maintenance of the acyl-CoA pool and ROS homeostasis. Furthermore, quantification of plant hormones supported the findings observed in the transcriptome and an increase in jasmonic acid level occurred in osacbp6. In summary, OsACBP6 appears to be required for the efficient utilization of acyl-CoAs. Disruption of OsACBP6 compromises growth and led to provoked defense response, suggesting a correlation of enhanced acyl-CoAs content with defense responses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUNDS
BACKGROUND
Acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) esters are important intermediates in lipid metabolism with regulatory properties. Acyl-CoA-binding proteins bind and transport acyl-CoAs to fulfill these functions. RICE ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN6 (OsACBP6) is currently the only one peroxisome-localized plant ACBP that has been proposed to be involved in β-oxidation in transgenic Arabidopsis. The role of the peroxisomal ACBP (OsACBP6) in rice (Oryza sativa) was investigated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Here, we report on the function of OsACBP6 in rice. The osacbp6 mutant showed diminished growth with reduction in root meristem activity and leaf growth. Acyl-CoA profiling and lipidomic analysis revealed an increase in acyl-CoA content and a slight triacylglycerol accumulation caused by the loss of OsACBP6. Comparative transcriptomic analysis discerned the biological processes arising from the loss of OsACBP6. Reduced response to oxidative stress was represented by a decline in gene expression of a group of peroxidases and peroxidase activities. An elevation in hydrogen peroxide was observed in both roots and shoots/leaves of osacbp6. Taken together, loss of OsACBP6 not only resulted in a disruption of the acyl-CoA homeostasis but also peroxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis. In contrast, osacbp6-complemented transgenic rice displayed similar phenotype to the wild type rice, supporting a role for OsACBP6 in the maintenance of the acyl-CoA pool and ROS homeostasis. Furthermore, quantification of plant hormones supported the findings observed in the transcriptome and an increase in jasmonic acid level occurred in osacbp6.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, OsACBP6 appears to be required for the efficient utilization of acyl-CoAs. Disruption of OsACBP6 compromises growth and led to provoked defense response, suggesting a correlation of enhanced acyl-CoAs content with defense responses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33159253
doi: 10.1186/s12284-020-00435-y
pii: 10.1186/s12284-020-00435-y
pmc: PMC7647982
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
75Subventions
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
ID : 2572017CA20
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China
ID : QC2015033
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31500202
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31870528
Organisme : Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
ID : 2015M571380
Organisme : Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
ID : HKU17105615M
Références
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:115-42
pubmed: 18444898
Plant Cell. 2007 Apr;19(4):1376-87
pubmed: 17449810
Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):304-15
pubmed: 18621979
Anal Biochem. 1985 Oct;150(1):8-12
pubmed: 4083485
J Genet Genomics. 2014 May 20;41(5):293-304
pubmed: 24894356
Plant Cell Physiol. 2019 Dec 1;60(12):2812-2825
pubmed: 31504915
Protoplasma. 2016 Sep;253(5):1177-95
pubmed: 26340904
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Sep;1861(9 Pt B):1409-1421
pubmed: 26747650
New Phytol. 2018 Apr;218(1):183-200
pubmed: 29288621
Biosci Rep. 2014 Dec 23;34(6):e00165
pubmed: 25423293
Plant Methods. 2010 Jan 28;6(1):5
pubmed: 20181034
Plant J. 2001 Oct;28(1):1-12
pubmed: 11696182
Front Plant Sci. 2011 Dec 27;2:103
pubmed: 22645559
J Lipid Res. 2014 Feb;55(2):289-98
pubmed: 24287120
J Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;162(8):912-20
pubmed: 16146317
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009 Jun;47(6):485-90
pubmed: 19136267
Plant J. 2001 Jan;25(1):115-25
pubmed: 11169187
J Nutr. 2000 Feb;130(2S Suppl):294S-298S
pubmed: 10721891
Proteomics. 2019 Jun;19(12):e1800368
pubmed: 31054181
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(2):469-82
pubmed: 24738983
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):113-117
pubmed: 30676650
Plant J. 2013 Apr;74(2):294-309
pubmed: 23448237
Plant J. 2004 Mar;37(6):914-39
pubmed: 14996223
Plant Physiol. 2010 May;153(1):114-27
pubmed: 20348210
Plant Cell. 2012 Jun;24(6):2279-303
pubmed: 22669882
Arabidopsis Book. 2013;11:e0161
pubmed: 23505340
Plant Cell. 2011 Jan;23(1):412-27
pubmed: 21239643
J Exp Bot. 2014 Dec;65(22):6723-33
pubmed: 25297549
Plant Cell. 2004 Feb;16(2):394-405
pubmed: 14742880
Plant Physiol. 2010 Mar;152(3):1585-97
pubmed: 20107029
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Nov 13;13(11):e1006724
pubmed: 29131851
J Biol Chem. 1985 Oct 25;260(24):12920-6
pubmed: 4055727
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Oct;19(10):1127-37
pubmed: 17022177
Front Genet. 2018 May 22;9:182
pubmed: 29872448
Prog Lipid Res. 2016 Jul;63:165-81
pubmed: 27368137
Rice (N Y). 2016 Dec;9(1):2
pubmed: 26810875
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373-99
pubmed: 15377225
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Nov;9(11):534-40
pubmed: 15501178
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Feb;56(2):322-33
pubmed: 25395473
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 22;110(4):1279-84
pubmed: 23288899
J Plant Res. 2015 Nov;128(6):953-74
pubmed: 26459328
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017 May 1;73(Pt 5):438-448
pubmed: 28471368
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1167-75
pubmed: 24194592
Plant Cell. 2010 May;22(5):1463-82
pubmed: 20442372
J Biol Chem. 2002 Aug 30;277(35):31994-2002
pubmed: 12077151
Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 19;5:3476
pubmed: 24647160
Plant Physiol. 2013 Dec;163(4):1752-65
pubmed: 24143807
Plant Cell. 2017 Mar;29(3):560-574
pubmed: 28298519
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018 Apr 29;69:363-386
pubmed: 29166128
Plant Physiol. 2013 Jul;162(3):1282-9
pubmed: 23686420
Protein Sci. 2013 Oct;22(10):1432-8
pubmed: 23934749
Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 Sep;57(9):1814-27
pubmed: 27335352
PLoS Genet. 2015 Aug 14;11(8):e1005464
pubmed: 26275148
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Apr 15;170(6):591-600
pubmed: 23261264
Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov;127(3):1266-78
pubmed: 11706205
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 18;115(51):E12101-E12110
pubmed: 30509981
Plant Physiol. 2011 Dec;157(4):1987-99
pubmed: 21984727
Cell. 2010 Nov 12;143(4):606-16
pubmed: 21074051
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Aug;44:72-81
pubmed: 29555489
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Mar;54(4):489-502
pubmed: 15316285
New Phytol. 2011 Mar;189(4):1170-84
pubmed: 21128943
Plant Cell. 1999 Oct;11(10):1911-24
pubmed: 10521521
Plant Cell Physiol. 2020 Apr 1;61(4):735-747
pubmed: 31883014
Prog Lipid Res. 2015 Jul;59:1-25
pubmed: 25898985
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
J Exp Bot. 2014 Sep;65(17):4833-47
pubmed: 24913629
Nat Protoc. 2010 Jun;5(6):986-92
pubmed: 20448544
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018 Apr 29;69:387-415
pubmed: 29539269
New Phytol. 2010 Jun;186(4):843-55
pubmed: 20345632
Plant J. 2006 Mar;45(6):930-41
pubmed: 16507084
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W122-W129
pubmed: 28472432
Nat Commun. 2014 May 07;5:3767
pubmed: 24806884
Mol Plant. 2014 Nov;7(11):1683-1692
pubmed: 25239066