Do educated women in Sierra Leone support discontinuation of female genital mutilation/cutting? Evidence from the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey.
Discontinue
Female genital mutilation/cutting
Reproductive health
Sierra Leone
Women
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Nov 2020
07 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
8
11
2020
pubmed:
9
11
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) comprises all procedures that involve the total or partial elimination of the external genitalia or any injury to the female genital organ for non-medical purposes. More than 200 million females have undergone the procedure globally, with a prevalence of 89.6% in Sierra Leone. Education is acknowledged as a fundamental strategy to end FGM/C. This study aims to assess women's educational attainment and how this impacts their views on whether FGM/C should be discontinued in Sierra Leone. We used data from the 2013 Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey. A total of 15,228 women were included in the study. We carried out a descriptive analysis, followed by Binary Logistic Regression analyses. We presented the results of the Binary Logistic Regression as Crude Odds Ratios (COR) and Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Most of the women with formal education (65.5%) and 15.6% of those without formal education indicated that FGM/C should be discontinued. Similarly, 35% of those aged 15-19 indicated that FGM/C should be discontinued. Women with a higher education level had a higher likelihood of reporting that FGM/C should be discontinued [AOR 4.02; CI 3.00-5.41]. Christian women [AOR 1.72; CI 1.44-2.04], those who reported that FGM/C is not required by religion [AOR 8.68; CI 7.29-10.34], wealthier women [AOR 1.37; CI 1.03-1.83] and those residing in the western part of Sierra Leone [AOR 1.61; CI 1.16-2.23] were more likely to state that FGM/C should be discontinued. In contrast, women in union [AOR 0.75; CI 0.62-0.91], circumcised women [AOR 0.41; CI 0.33-0.52], residents of the northern region [AOR 0.63; CI 0.46-0.85] and women aged 45-49 [AOR 0.66; CI 0.48-0.89] were less likely to report that FGM/C should be discontinued in Sierra Leone. This study supports the argument that education is crucial to end FGM/C. Age, religion and religious support for FGM/C, marital status, wealth status, region, place of residence, mothers' experience of FGM/C and having a daughter at home are key influences on the discontinuation of FGM/C in Sierra Leone. The study demonstrates the need to pay critical attention to uneducated women, older women and women who have been circumcised to help Sierra Leone end FGM/C and increase its prospects of achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) three and five.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33160372
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01027-1
pii: 10.1186/s12978-020-01027-1
pmc: PMC7648938
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
174Références
Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Dec;17(4 Spec No):156-60
pubmed: 24689327
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Apr;92(4):838-847
pubmed: 25732681
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Oct 18;16(1):183
pubmed: 29047376
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;107(3):232-5
pubmed: 19716126
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Jun;24(6):833-6
pubmed: 21121711
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Feb 20;7:259-69
pubmed: 25759602
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Jan 09;7:85-93
pubmed: 25657598
Lancet. 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):415
pubmed: 29407020
Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 1;16(1):158
pubmed: 31675972
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 07;11(1):e0145329
pubmed: 26741488
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 22;16(1):113
pubmed: 31331357
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2010 Mar;20(1):49-53
pubmed: 22434960
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):469-74
pubmed: 16553657
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):120-127F
pubmed: 22423163
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1399-405
pubmed: 22676502
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Apr;88(4):281-8
pubmed: 20431792
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):19
pubmed: 32703226
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Feb 24;15:31
pubmed: 26911243
Stud Fam Plann. 2013 Jun;44(2):189-204
pubmed: 23720002
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:680926
pubmed: 24204384
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;287(6):1137-49
pubmed: 23315098
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 08;15:1034
pubmed: 26449728
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 12;15(1):62
pubmed: 29650025
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 30;18(1):25
pubmed: 30700330
Reprod Health. 2011 Oct 03;8:26
pubmed: 21967670
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):253-257
pubmed: 30779344
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Sep 18;18(1):150
pubmed: 30227845
Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;16(4):119-31
pubmed: 23444549
J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jan;2(1):41-5
pubmed: 21483197
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 1999 Dec;13(12):709-16
pubmed: 10743534
Int J Equity Health. 2015 May 08;14:42
pubmed: 25952361