Content validation of the Kamath and Stothard questionnaire for carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis: a cognitive interviewing study.


Journal

Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 25 07 2020
accepted: 29 10 2020
entrez: 8 11 2020
pubmed: 9 11 2020
medline: 23 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Accurate diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is essential for directing appropriate treatment; and for making decisions about work injury claims. The Kamath and Stothard Questionnaire (KSQ) is a self-reported tool used for the diagnosis of CTS. Comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of this questionnaire are critical to diagnostic performance and need to be established. The purpose of the study was to describe how potential respondents, clinicians, and measurement researchers interpret KSQ questions in order to identify and resolve potential sources of misclassification. Hand therapists, measurement researchers, participants with CTS, and a control group were interviewed using cognitive interviewing techniques (talk aloud, semi-structured interview probes) in Hamilton, Canada. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A directed content analysis was done to analyze the interviews using a previously established framework. Eighteen participants were interviewed. Areas, where questions were unclear to some participants, were recorded and categorized into five themes: Clarity and Comprehension (52%), Relativeness (38%), Inadequate Response Definition (4%), Perspective Modifiers (4%), and Reference Point (2%). Respondents also identified several symptoms of CTS that are not covered by the KSQ that might be of diagnostic value, e.g., weakness and dropping items. The content validity of the current iteration of the KSQ was not established. The problematic questions identified in the study have been reported to have low specificity and negative predictive values in a previous quantitative study. The content validity issues identified may explain the poor performance. Recommendations were made to modify the wording of the KSQ and the potential addition of three new questions. Future studies should determine whether the modified questionnaire can provide better diagnostic accuracy and psychometric properties. The results of this study may assist in ruling in or out CTS diagnosis to a wide variety of target audience, such as hand specialists, physical and occupational therapists, as well as family doctors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Accurate diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is essential for directing appropriate treatment; and for making decisions about work injury claims. The Kamath and Stothard Questionnaire (KSQ) is a self-reported tool used for the diagnosis of CTS. Comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of this questionnaire are critical to diagnostic performance and need to be established. The purpose of the study was to describe how potential respondents, clinicians, and measurement researchers interpret KSQ questions in order to identify and resolve potential sources of misclassification.
METHODS METHODS
Hand therapists, measurement researchers, participants with CTS, and a control group were interviewed using cognitive interviewing techniques (talk aloud, semi-structured interview probes) in Hamilton, Canada. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A directed content analysis was done to analyze the interviews using a previously established framework.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Eighteen participants were interviewed. Areas, where questions were unclear to some participants, were recorded and categorized into five themes: Clarity and Comprehension (52%), Relativeness (38%), Inadequate Response Definition (4%), Perspective Modifiers (4%), and Reference Point (2%). Respondents also identified several symptoms of CTS that are not covered by the KSQ that might be of diagnostic value, e.g., weakness and dropping items.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The content validity of the current iteration of the KSQ was not established. The problematic questions identified in the study have been reported to have low specificity and negative predictive values in a previous quantitative study. The content validity issues identified may explain the poor performance. Recommendations were made to modify the wording of the KSQ and the potential addition of three new questions. Future studies should determine whether the modified questionnaire can provide better diagnostic accuracy and psychometric properties. The results of this study may assist in ruling in or out CTS diagnosis to a wide variety of target audience, such as hand specialists, physical and occupational therapists, as well as family doctors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33160376
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01614-7
pii: 10.1186/s12955-020-01614-7
pmc: PMC7648957
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

359

Références

Nurs Stand. 2010 Jan 13-19;24(19):44-8
pubmed: 20175360
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Oct;122(10):2067-70
pubmed: 21454124
Hand (N Y). 2007 Sep;2(3):127-34
pubmed: 18780073
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2015 Jan;20(1):4-9
pubmed: 25630774
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Nov;50(11):622-631
pubmed: 32938312
Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Aug;60(4):397-9
pubmed: 2816314
Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Apr;85(2):99-105
pubmed: 29475370
J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Oct;28(5):455-9
pubmed: 12954256
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92
pubmed: 8245050
Ulster Med J. 2008 Jan;77(1):6-17
pubmed: 18269111
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Apr;30(2):224-34
pubmed: 17380524
BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1112-8
pubmed: 25778497
Neurology. 2002 Jun 11;58(11):1597-602
pubmed: 12058085
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD010003
pubmed: 22786532
J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Mar;15(2):360-3
pubmed: 2324471
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S21-30
pubmed: 17060830
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Surgeon. 2019 Jun;17(3):156-159
pubmed: 30935878
Hand Surg. 2011;16(1):39-42
pubmed: 21348029
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Mar;72(3):204-9
pubmed: 12071453
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):1750-1754
pubmed: 27869627
CMAJ. 2014 Aug 5;186(11):853
pubmed: 24566652
Hum Factors. 2007 Feb;49(1):88-99
pubmed: 17315846
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170
pubmed: 29550964

Auteurs

Armaghan Dabbagh (A)

School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Elborn College, Western University, London, ON, Canada. adabbag@uwo.ca.

Joy C MacDermid (JC)

School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Elborn College, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada.

Tara L Packham (TL)

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Luciana G Macedo (LG)

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH