Feasibility and Acceptability of mHealth Interventions for Managing Hyperphosphatemia in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.
Journal
Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation
ISSN: 1532-8503
Titre abrégé: J Ren Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9112938
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
23
09
2019
revised:
25
06
2020
accepted:
26
07
2020
pubmed:
9
11
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
8
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) phosphorus management programs in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Patients receiving thrice-weekly HD who had 3-month average serum phosphorus of >5.5 mg/dL were randomized to one of the three self-directed phosphorus management programs delivered using tablet PCs: (1) educational videos and handouts (Education), (2) education intervention plus mobile self-monitoring with email feedback (Monitoring), or (3) education and monitoring interventions plus social cognitive theory-based behavioral videos (Combined). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed based on enrollment and retention and training needs (feasibility) and adherence to self-monitoring and reported satisfaction (acceptability). Of 312 patients, 56 expressed interest, and 40 were enrolled. The majority of participants (80%) completed the 6-month study; none withdrew for intervention-related reasons. The Monitoring and Combined groups received 44 ± 15 minutes of technology training, which was considered adequate by most (75%). Self-monitoring rates were initially high, with 78% and 71% of the participants recording at least one meal and phosphate binder in week 1, respectively, but decreased over time to 15% and 9% in the final week. Most participants reported that self-monitoring helped them stay motivated (64%), track nutrients (80%), and understand how to change diet (76%), and nearly two-thirds of participants (64%) stated that they would like to continue using the tablet PC to manage their health. However, few participants (16%) indicated that self-monitoring was worth the effort. The Monitoring and Combined groups did not differ from the Education group in study outcomes. Although the mHealth programs were generally well received, self-monitoring rates decreased substantially over time and were unaffected by social cognitive theory-based videos. Self-directed mHealth programs may be a useful adjunct to standard care but should be compared to more resource intensive programs (e.g., involving more "live" contact with a dietitian) to determine overall cost-effectiveness and role in HD care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33160812
pii: S1051-2276(20)30207-7
doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.07.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
403-410Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.