Significance of Discordant Results Between Confirmatory Tests in Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism.
Adrenal Glands
/ blood supply
Aged
Aldosterone
/ analysis
Blood Specimen Collection
/ methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Female
Humans
Hyperaldosteronism
/ complications
Hypertension
/ diagnosis
Japan
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies
adrenal gland
aldosterone
hyperaldosteronism
hypertension
Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 01 2021
23 01 2021
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
pubmed:
10
11
2020
medline:
10
9
2021
entrez:
9
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current clinical guidelines recommend confirmation of a positive result in at least one confirmatory test in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Clinical implication of multiple confirmatory tests has not been established, especially when patients show discordant results. The aim of the present study was to explore the role of 2 confirmatory tests in subtype diagnosis of PA. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at two referral centers. We identified 360 hypertensive patients who underwent both a captopril challenge test (CCT) and a saline infusion test (SIT) and exhibited at least one positive result. Among them, we studied 193 patients with PA whose data were available for subtype diagnosis based on adrenal vein sampling (AVS). The prevalence of bilateral subtype on AVS according to the results of the confirmatory tests was measured. Of patients studied, 127 were positive for both CCT and SIT (double-positive), whereas 66 were positive for either CCT or SIT (single-positive) (n = 34 and n = 32, respectively). Altogether, 135 were diagnosed with bilateral subtype on AVS. The single-positive patients had milder clinical features of PA than the double-positive patients. The prevalence of bilateral subtype on AVS was significantly higher in the single-positive patients than in the double-positive patients. (63/66 [95.5%] vs 72/127 [56.7%], P < .01). Several clinical parameters were different between CCT single-positive and SIT single-positive patients. Patients with discordant results between CCT and SIT have a high probability of bilateral subtype of PA on AVS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33165595
pii: 5963911
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa812
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aldosterone
4964P6T9RB
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e866-e874Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.