Therapeutic implications of immune-profiling and EGFR expression in salivary gland carcinoma.
PD-L1
adenoid cystic carcinoma
combined proportion score
immunotherapy
microsatellite instability
salivary gland carcinoma
Journal
Head & neck
ISSN: 1097-0347
Titre abrégé: Head Neck
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8902541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
29
04
2020
revised:
22
10
2020
accepted:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
10
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data relating to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) is gradually evolving with responses varying among different histotypes. To address these disparities, this retrospective analysis examined the prevalence of recognized biomarkers of response to ICI; namely programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), combined positive score (CPS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with SGC with an aim to determine any prognostic or survival benefits and stratify the use of ICI in this disease. Of 52 patients with primary SGC eligible for this study, the most common histological types were adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 17, 33%), salivary duct carcinoma (n = 14, 27%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 11, 21%), and acinic cell carcinoma (n = 6, 11%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the Ventana Discovery Ultra auto-staining platform for EGFR, PD-1, PD-L1, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. CPS ≥1 defined PD-L1 positive cases and log-rank testing was performed to examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). CPS positivity was seen in 9 (17.3%) patients, none of which were adenoid cystic carcinoma. All 52 (100%) cases expressed retained MMR proteins inferring microsatellite stability (MSS) and EGFR expression was identified in 45 of 52 (86.5%) patients. CPS positivity (score ≥1) was significantly associated with advanced pathological T status (P = .021), advanced pathological N status (P = .006), high histological tumor grade (P = .045), and positive histological margin (P = .023). Patients with PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells did not have an inferior 3-year OS (P = .93). The data from this retrospective study highlighting the uniform microsatellite stability alongside the low prevalence of CPS positivity suggests that only a minority of SGC patients may benefit from ICI therapy alone. The high rates of EGFR expression in SGC may be a target to augment immune checkpoint therapy response.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Data relating to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) is gradually evolving with responses varying among different histotypes. To address these disparities, this retrospective analysis examined the prevalence of recognized biomarkers of response to ICI; namely programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), combined positive score (CPS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with SGC with an aim to determine any prognostic or survival benefits and stratify the use of ICI in this disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Of 52 patients with primary SGC eligible for this study, the most common histological types were adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 17, 33%), salivary duct carcinoma (n = 14, 27%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 11, 21%), and acinic cell carcinoma (n = 6, 11%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the Ventana Discovery Ultra auto-staining platform for EGFR, PD-1, PD-L1, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. CPS ≥1 defined PD-L1 positive cases and log-rank testing was performed to examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
CPS positivity was seen in 9 (17.3%) patients, none of which were adenoid cystic carcinoma. All 52 (100%) cases expressed retained MMR proteins inferring microsatellite stability (MSS) and EGFR expression was identified in 45 of 52 (86.5%) patients. CPS positivity (score ≥1) was significantly associated with advanced pathological T status (P = .021), advanced pathological N status (P = .006), high histological tumor grade (P = .045), and positive histological margin (P = .023). Patients with PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells did not have an inferior 3-year OS (P = .93).
CONCLUSION
The data from this retrospective study highlighting the uniform microsatellite stability alongside the low prevalence of CPS positivity suggests that only a minority of SGC patients may benefit from ICI therapy alone. The high rates of EGFR expression in SGC may be a target to augment immune checkpoint therapy response.
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
768-777Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
El-Naggar AK, JKC C, Grandis JR, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Head and Neck. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2017.
Guzzo M, Locati LD, Prott FJ, Gatta G, McGurk M, Licitra L. Major and minor salivary gland tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;74:134-148.
Mukaigawa T, Hayashi R, Hashimoto K, Ugumori T, Hato N, Fujii S. Programmed death ligand-1 expression is associated with poor disease free survival in salivary gland carcinomas. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114:36-43.
Sood S, McGurk M, Vaz F. Management of salivary gland tumours: United Kingdom National multidisciplinary guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:S142-S149.
Al-Mamgani A, van Rooij P, Sewnaik A, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of parotid gland treated with surgery and radiotherapy: long-term outcomes, QoL assessment and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:278-283.
Garden AS, el-Naggar AK, Morrison WH, Callender DL, Ang KK, Peters LJ. Postoperative radiotherapy for malignant tumors of the parotid gland. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:79-85.
Dillon PM, Chakraborty S, Moskaluk CA, Joshi PJ, Thomas CY. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: a review of recent advances, molecular targets, and clinical trials. Head Neck. 2016;38:620-627.
Chen AM, Bucci MK, Quivey JM, Garcia J, Eisele DW, Fu KK. Long-term outcome of patients treated by radiation therapy alone for salivary gland carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1044-1050.
Cianchetti M, Sandow PS, Scarborough LD, et al. Radiation therapy for minor salivary gland carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1334-1338.
Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, Werning JW, Villaret DB. Radiotherapy alone or combined with surgery for salivary gland carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:2544-2550.
Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018;81:45-51.
Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Pasquini E, et al. Immunotherapy in head and neck cancer: evidence and perspectives. Immunotherapy. 2017;9:1351-1358.
Cohen EEW, Soulieres D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2018;393:P156.
Taberna M, Oliva M, Mesia R. Cetuximab-containing combinations in locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:383.
Andersson MK, Stenman G. The landscape of gene fusions and somatic mutations in salivary gland neoplasms-implications for diagnosis and therapy. Oral Oncol. 2016;57:63-69.
Clauditz TS, Gontarewicz A, Lebok P, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in salivary gland carcinomas: potentials as therapeutic target. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:991-996.
Kulangara K, Zhang N, Corigliano E, et al. Clinical utility of the combined positive score for programmed death ligand-1 expression and the approval of Pembrolizumab for treatment of gastric cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143:330-337.
Viale G, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4719194.
Gajiwala KS, Feng J, Ferre R, et al. Insights into the aberrant activity of mutant EGFR kinase domain and drug recognition. Structure. 2013;21:209-219.
Yun CH, Boggon TJ, Li Y, et al. Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:217-227.
Hennessy BT, Smith DL, Ram PT, Lu Y, Mills GB. Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:988-1004.
Keller G, Steinmann D, Quaas A, Grünwald V, Janssen S, Hussein K. New concepts of personalized therapy in salivary gland carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2017;68:103-113.
Hitre E, Budai B, Takacsi-Nagy Z, et al. Cetuximab and platinum-based chemoradio- or chemotherapy of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing adenoid cystic carcinoma: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1117-1122.
Agulnik M, Cohen EWE, Cohen RB, et al. Phase II study of Lapatinib in recurrent or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor and/or erbB2 expressing adenoid cystic carcinoma and non-adenoid cystic carcinoma malignant tumors of the salivary glands. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3978-3984.
Jakob JA, Kies MS, Glisson BS, et al. Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers. Head Neck. 2015;37:644-649.
Locati LD, Bossi P, Perrone F, et al. Cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas: a phase II study. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:574-578.
El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2492-2502.
Chew HY, De Lima PO, Gonzalez Cruz JL, et al. Endocytosis inhibition in humans to improve responses to ADCC-mediating antibodies. Cell. 2020;180:895-914.
Cohen RB, Delord JP, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced salivary gland carcinoma: findings of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-028 study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(11):1083-1088.
Harada K, Ferdous T, Ueyama Y. PD-L1 expression in malignant salivary gland tumors. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:156.
Nakano T, Takizawa K, Uezato A, Taguchi K, Toh S, Masuda M. Prognostic value of programed death ligand-1 and ligand-2 co-expression in salivary gland carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2019;90:30-37.
Xu B, Jungbluth AA, Frosina D, et al. Immune microenvironment and expression of PD-L1, PD-1, cancer testis antigen PRAME and MHC I in salivary duct carcinoma. Histopathology. 2019;75:672-682.
Sridharan V, Gjini E, Liao X, et al. Immune profiling of adenoid cystic carcinoma: PD-L2 expression and associations with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4:679-687.
Linxweiler M, Kuo F, Katabi N, et al. The immune microenvironment and neoantigen landscape of aggressive salivary gland carcinomas differ by subtype. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(12):2859-2870.
Sato F, Akiba J, Kawahara A, et al. The expression of programed death ligand-1 could be related with unfavorable prognosis in salivary duct carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47:683-690.
Rischin D, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Protocol-specified final analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial of pembrolizumab (pembro) as first-line therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:6000.