Predicting the Sensory Consequences of Self-Generated Actions: Pre-Supplementary Motor Area as Supra-Modal Hub in the Sense of Agency Experience.
fMRI
intentional binding
motor awareness
pre-SMA
sense of agency
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Nov 2020
07 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
revised:
03
11
2020
accepted:
05
11
2020
entrez:
11
11
2020
pubmed:
12
11
2020
medline:
12
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sense of agency refers to the feeling that one's self-generated action caused an external environment event. In a previous study, we suggested that the supplementary motor area (SMA), in its anterior portion (pre-SMA), is a key structure for attributing the sense of agency for the visual consequences of self-generated movements. However, real-life actions can lead to outcomes in different sensory modalities, raising the question of whether SMA represents a supra-modal hub for the sense of agency. Here, we compared the agency experience for visual and auditory outcomes by taking advantage of the intentional binding effect (IB). We observed discrete time-windows for the agency manifestation across different sensory modalities: While there was an IB at 200 ms delay between the action and the visual outcome, a time compression was observed when the auditory outcome followed the action by 400 ms. The magnitude of the IB was mirrored by meaningful brain activity in the pre-SMA but only at the specific delay when a sizeable IB was seen. We conclude that attributing consequences of self-generated movements to one's action is based on similar mechanisms across sensory modalities and that those mechanisms are related to the functioning of the motor system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33171715
pii: brainsci10110825
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110825
pmc: PMC7694977
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : Ricerca Corrente; Project L3025
Références
Ergonomics. 1994 Jun;37(6):989-94
pubmed: 8026456
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Nov;9(11):856-69
pubmed: 18843271
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 22;277(1693):2503-9
pubmed: 20375048
Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):208-20
pubmed: 24293266
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 29;355(1404):1771-88
pubmed: 11205340
Elife. 2019 Nov 18;8:
pubmed: 31738161
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):546-61
pubmed: 22240158
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):871-84
pubmed: 20436185
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):382-5
pubmed: 11896397
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Aug;42(3):1889-94
pubmed: 25940532
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1212-7
pubmed: 11127840
Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):404-12
pubmed: 14527600
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2515-2526
pubmed: 27515031
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 1;6(27):
pubmed: 32937445
Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1935-42
pubmed: 23067726
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
pubmed: 11771995
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
pubmed: 7569931
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 12;10:804
pubmed: 31031676
Neuroimage. 1996 Dec;4(3 Pt 1):223-35
pubmed: 9345513
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Apr;18(4):196-207
pubmed: 28251993
Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T155-63
pubmed: 17499162
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7440-7445
pubmed: 29950316
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 May;40(7):2052-2054
pubmed: 29091338
Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;7(4):254-66
pubmed: 10408769
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;117(11):2341-56
pubmed: 16876476
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 10;8:421
pubmed: 24959135
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Dec;22(4):1431-41
pubmed: 24161792
Neuroimage. 1995 Sep;2(3):173-81
pubmed: 9343600
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):R11-6
pubmed: 10943682
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:38-42
pubmed: 25490127
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:207-14
pubmed: 23567890
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2375-86
pubmed: 19837176
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491