Continuous subcutaneous infusion for pain control in dying patients: experiences from a tertiary palliative care center.


Journal

BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 19 07 2020
accepted: 05 11 2020
entrez: 11 11 2020
pubmed: 12 11 2020
medline: 16 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via ambulatory infusion pump (AIP) is a valuable method of pain control in palliative care. When using CSCI, low-dose methadone as add-on to other opioids might be an option in complex pain situations. This study aimed to investigate the effects, and adverse effects, of CSCI for pain control in dying patients, with particular interest in methadone use. This was an observational cohort study. Imminently dying patients with pain, admitted to specialized palliative inpatient wards and introduced on CSCI, were monitored daily by staff for symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale - IPOS), sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - ECOG) and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method - CAM). Ninety-three patients with a median survival of 4 days were included. Of the 47 patients who survived ≥3 days, the proportion of patients with severe/overwhelming pain decreased from 45 to 19% (p < 0.001) after starting CSCI, with only a moderate increase in morphine equivalent daily dose of opioids (MEDD). Alertness was marginally decreased (1 point on the 10-point RASS scale, p = 0.001), whereas performance status and prevalence of delirium, regardless of age, remained unchanged. Both patients with methadone as add-on (MET, n = 13) and patients with only other opioids (NMET, n = 34), improved in pain control (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), despite that MET patients had higher pain scores at baseline (p < 0.05) and were on a higher MEDD (240 mg vs.133 mg). No serious adverse effects demanding treatment stop were reported. CSCI via AIP is an effective way to reduce pain in dying patients without increased adverse effects. Add-on methadone may be beneficial in patients with severe complex pain.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via ambulatory infusion pump (AIP) is a valuable method of pain control in palliative care. When using CSCI, low-dose methadone as add-on to other opioids might be an option in complex pain situations. This study aimed to investigate the effects, and adverse effects, of CSCI for pain control in dying patients, with particular interest in methadone use.
METHODS METHODS
This was an observational cohort study. Imminently dying patients with pain, admitted to specialized palliative inpatient wards and introduced on CSCI, were monitored daily by staff for symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale - IPOS), sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - ECOG) and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method - CAM).
RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-three patients with a median survival of 4 days were included. Of the 47 patients who survived ≥3 days, the proportion of patients with severe/overwhelming pain decreased from 45 to 19% (p < 0.001) after starting CSCI, with only a moderate increase in morphine equivalent daily dose of opioids (MEDD). Alertness was marginally decreased (1 point on the 10-point RASS scale, p = 0.001), whereas performance status and prevalence of delirium, regardless of age, remained unchanged. Both patients with methadone as add-on (MET, n = 13) and patients with only other opioids (NMET, n = 34), improved in pain control (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), despite that MET patients had higher pain scores at baseline (p < 0.05) and were on a higher MEDD (240 mg vs.133 mg). No serious adverse effects demanding treatment stop were reported.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CSCI via AIP is an effective way to reduce pain in dying patients without increased adverse effects. Add-on methadone may be beneficial in patients with severe complex pain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33172459
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00681-3
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00681-3
pmc: PMC7657347
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

172

Références

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1070-1090.e9
pubmed: 27112310
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35
pubmed: 18049195
J Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;19(9):972-8
pubmed: 27399839
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;9(2):537-541
pubmed: 32233628
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2018 Mar;45(Suppl 1):111-113
pubmed: 29650892
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD004847
pubmed: 15266542
J Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;16(3):305-9
pubmed: 23391350
J Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;16(6):616-22
pubmed: 23556990
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Feb;21(2):60, 62-4
pubmed: 25715160
J Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;23(2):226-232
pubmed: 31436477
Pain. 2020 Apr;161(4):703-712
pubmed: 31770157
Palliat Support Care. 2008 Jun;6(2):165-76
pubmed: 18501052
J Palliat Med. 2015 Feb;18(2):114-9
pubmed: 25494475
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):177-181
pubmed: 28792784
World J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 22;2(4):58-70
pubmed: 24175169
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):477-84
pubmed: 16218160
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Mar 2;115(9):135-142
pubmed: 29563006
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD012592
pubmed: 28683172
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e58-68
pubmed: 22300860
Age Ageing. 1996 May;25(3):206-8
pubmed: 8670553
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230845
pubmed: 32275723
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Jul;18(1):49-52
pubmed: 10439572
Pain. 1991 May;45(2):141-3
pubmed: 1876420
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jun;38(6):1015-23
pubmed: 15122000
Palliat Med. 1999 Jul;13(4):299-310
pubmed: 10659099
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Nov;44(5):704-14
pubmed: 22819440
Pain. 1993 Sep;54(3):329-34
pubmed: 8233548
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Nov;12(11):762-6
pubmed: 15206014
Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):578-96
pubmed: 21708861
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):599-610
pubmed: 26415736
J Palliat Med. 2008 Dec;11(10):1319-24
pubmed: 19115891
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44
pubmed: 12421743
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(2):7-12
pubmed: 16061456

Auteurs

Per Fürst (P)

Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. per.furst@ki.se.
Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden. per.furst@ki.se.

Staffan Lundström (S)

Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pål Klepstad (P)

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
European Palliative Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Peter Strang (P)

Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH