A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

European Association of Urology guidelines Guideline uptake Social media Twitter Urology

Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 18 09 2020
revised: 10 10 2020
accepted: 19 10 2020
pubmed: 12 11 2020
medline: 14 4 2022
entrez: 11 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Clinical practice guideline (CPG) uptake does not occur spontaneously and requires active implementation, especially for long-term implementation. Social media (SoMe) with its power of rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field can open up unprecedented opportunities for CPG dissemination. The aim of this review was to assess the current use of SoMe in CPG dissemination across different medical specialties. A systematic review (SR) of the literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the general platform Google were searched for all relevant publications (no limitation for publication time and no language restrictions). The search revealed 1881 citations; following title and abstract review, 22 studies were identified; and five studies were finally included after full-text review. All included studies were published in the past 5 yr; there was a significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior toward CPGs with the use of SoMe dissemination compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process of CPG dissemination, and expressed an intent to engage in this method in the future. The studies included in the SR reported variable methods of SoMe use and similarly variable methods of analyzing the outcomes. Owing to the recent application of SoMe in the context of CPG dissemination, there is no standardized format for its use, and the data available are variable and limited. However, encouraging preliminary results have been reported using SoMe for CPG dissemination in multiple fields, and we have provided a pragmatic method of SoMe usage in CPG dissemination based on the review. It is vital to ensure a uniform method of application and assessment of SoMe use in CPG dissemination and implementation going forward. Social media (SoMe) plays an important role in rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field, and its power can be harnessed in the dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that guide clinicians in practice. Our review reveals that SoMe use for CPG dissemination is a relatively new concept published approximately 5 yr ago, and it has led to significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior with respect to the CPGs compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process. We have produced a pragmatic method of using SoMe in CPG dissemination. Considering the importance of CPGs in practice and the ever increasing role of SoMe in the medical profession, a new role for SoMe in CPG dissemination could be established.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33172773
pii: S2405-4569(20)30292-3
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1195-1204

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nikita R Bhatt (NR)

Department of Urology, East of England deanery, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: nikita.bhatt@nhs.net.

Stefan W Czarniecki (SW)

HIFU CLINIC Prostate Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland.

Hendrick Borgmann (H)

Department of Urology, University Medicine Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Inge M van Oort (IM)

Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Francesco Esperto (F)

Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy; Department of Urology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy; Department of Urology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.

Mark van Gurp (M)

Communications, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Jarka Bloemberg (J)

Communications, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

J Darraugh (J)

Guidelines, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Morgan Rouprêt (M)

Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Stacy Loeb (S)

Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

James N'Dow (J)

Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

Maria J Ribal (MJ)

Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain.

Gianluca Giannarini (G)

Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH