The influence of collecting patient-reported outcome measures on visit satisfaction in rheumatology clinics.

patient satisfaction patient-reported outcomes rheumatology

Journal

Rheumatology advances in practice
ISSN: 2514-1775
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Adv Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101736676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 12 03 2020
accepted: 29 07 2020
entrez: 11 11 2020
pubmed: 12 11 2020
medline: 12 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can direct patient-centred care and increase patient satisfaction with the visit. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the collection of PROMs and visit satisfaction, as measured by the Clinician and Group Practice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. An electronic platform for collection of patient-reported information was implemented in rheumatology clinics between August and September 2016. Adult patients were included in the study if they completed CG-CAHPS after an ambulatory visit. The pre-implementation cohort consisted of patients seen between January and June 2016; the post-implementation cohort consisted of patients seen between January and June 2017. The CG-CAHPS scores were compared between cohorts. Mixed effect models were constructed to identify predictors of visit satisfaction. Characteristics were similar between the 2117 pre- and 2380 post-implementation patients. Visit satisfaction was high in both cohorts but did not differ [odds ratio = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.19)]. Predictors of improved satisfaction included being an established patient, being male, older age and reporting higher quality of life. However, sensitivity analyses in the post-implementation cohort suggested that implementing PROMs might convey benefits for new patients, in particular. Collection of PROMs had no effect on visit satisfaction in rheumatology clinics, although there might be benefits for new patients. These largely null findings might be attributable to high satisfaction levels in our cohorts or to lack of provider review of PROM data with patients. Further research is indicated to determine the impact of provider communication of PROM results to patients on different domains of visit satisfaction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33173849
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa046
pii: rkaa046
pmc: PMC7607157
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

rkaa046

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Références

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1662-1670
pubmed: 31665477
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:125-135
pubmed: 28433671
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Apr;22(2):86-92
pubmed: 20133477
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3027-34
pubmed: 12479768
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
pubmed: 23358487
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2:42
pubmed: 30294712
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 May;43(5):640-7
pubmed: 15039493
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82
pubmed: 27044954
J Rheumatol. 2008 Nov;35(11):2136-47
pubmed: 18793006
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Qual Life Res. 2014 Jun;23(5):1505-13
pubmed: 24318085
Perspect Public Health. 2017 Mar;137(2):89-101
pubmed: 27004489
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):714-24
pubmed: 14966096
Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(7):811-8
pubmed: 2138357
Neurology. 2018 Sep 18;91(12):e1135-e1151
pubmed: 30135254
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65
pubmed: 26644527
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;62(6):857-64
pubmed: 20535797
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94
pubmed: 20685078
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 16;5:39
pubmed: 29503820
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):555-563
pubmed: 31104734
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S28-34
pubmed: 23064274
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;25(34):5374-80
pubmed: 18048818
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Feb;52(4):609-20
pubmed: 11206657
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):405-11
pubmed: 22331982
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):447-54
pubmed: 24163151
J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Nov;5(4):401-16
pubmed: 10579704
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939
pubmed: 27450481
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Feb;16(1):73-81
pubmed: 15020563
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jul-Aug;30(4 Suppl 73):S50-5
pubmed: 23079199
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;46(1):106-111
pubmed: 30219767
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:683-92
pubmed: 22195124
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905
pubmed: 23288613
J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Aug;21(5):256-62
pubmed: 26203830

Auteurs

Ryan Honomichl (R)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences.

Irene Katzan (I)

Neurological Institute Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation.

Nicolas Thompson (N)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences.

Abby Abelson (A)

Center for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease Orthopedic.

Chad Deal (C)

Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases.

Susannah Rose (S)

Office of Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Brittany Lapin (B)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences.

Classifications MeSH