Defensive Resource Allocation: The Roles of Forecast Information and Risk Control.

Forecast information homeland security resource allocation risk control

Journal

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
ISSN: 1539-6924
Titre abrégé: Risk Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109978

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
revised: 15 09 2020
received: 12 07 2019
accepted: 15 10 2020
pubmed: 12 11 2020
medline: 12 11 2020
entrez: 11 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In defensive resource allocation problems, the defender usually collects some forecast information about the attacker. However, the forecast information may be incorrect, which means that there could be a risk associated with the defender using it in their decision making. In this article, we propose a forecast and risk control (FRC) framework to manage the risk in defensive resource allocation with forecast information. In the FRC framework, we introduce a new measure of risk and three types of defense plans: riskless defense plan, risky defense plan, and risk-control defense plan. Several desirable properties based on the concepts of reward and penalty show that the risk-control defense plan is a general form to support defensive resource allocation. Subsequently, we study a specific defensive allocation problem with forecast information and develop an optimization model that considers the forecast information and the defender's risk tolerance level in order to obtain the risk-control defense plan with maximum reward. Furthermore, we provide some numerical analysis to illustrate the effects of forecast information and risk tolerance level on the risk-control defense plan. Finally, a numerical case study is presented to demonstrate the usability of a risk-control defense plan.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33175412
doi: 10.1111/risa.13626
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1304-1322

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.

Références

Aflaki, S., & Popescu, I. (2014). Managing retention in service relationships. Management Science, 60(2), 415-433.
Aghassi, M., & Bertsimas, D. (2006). Robust game theory. Mathematical Programming, 107(1), 231-273.
Al-Binali, S. (1999). A risk-reward framework for the competitive analysis of financial games. Algorithmica, 25, 99-115.
Ali, M. M., Boylan, J. E., & Syntetos, A. A. (2012). Forecast errors and inventory performance under forecast information sharing. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(4), 830-841.
Bier, V. M., Haphuriwat, N., Menoyo, J., Zimmerman, R., & Culpen, A. M. (2008). Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 763-770.
Bier, V. M., Oliveros, S., & Samuelson, L. (2007). Choosing what to protect: Strategic defensive allocation against an unknown attacker. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(4), 563-587.
Blum, D. M., & Paté-Cornell, E. (2016). Probabilistic warnings in national security crises: Pearl Harbor revisited. Decision Analysis, 13(1), 1-25.
Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE). (2011). Adaptive adversary modeling for terrorism risk analysis: Final report. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5(4), 559-583.
Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1985). Limits for the precision and value of information from dependent sources. Operations Research, 33(2), 427-442.
Cragin, R. K., & Daly, S. A. (2004). The dynamic terrorist threat: An assessment of group motivations and capabilities in a changing world. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Golany, B., Kaplan, E. H., Marmur, A., & Rothblum, U. G. (2009). Nature plays with dice-Terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 198-208.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1967). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I-III, part I: The basic model. Management Science, 14(3), 159-182.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1968a). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, part II: Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Science, 14(5), 320-334.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1968b). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, part III: The basic probability distribution of the game. Management Science, 14(7), 486-502.
He, F., & Zhuang, J. (2012). Modeling contracts between terrorist groups and governments in a sequential game. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(6), 790-809.
Jha, M. K. (2009). Dynamic Bayesian network for predicting the likelihood of a terrorist attack at critical transportation infrastructure facilities. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(1), 31-39.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
Keeney, R. L., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2011). A value model for evaluating homeland security decisions. Risk Analysis, 31(9), 1470-1487.
Kirshner, S. N., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2019). Heterogeneity of reference effects in the competitive newsvendor problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 571-581.
Lapan, H. E., & Sandler, T. (1993). Terrorism and signaling. European Journal of Political Economy, 9(3), 383-397.
Li, S. Y., Zhuang, J., & Shen, S. F. (2017). Dynamic forecasting conditional probability of bombing attacks based on time-series and intervention analysis. Risk Analysis, 37(7), 1287-1297.
MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: The Free Press.
Mai, B., & Kulkarni, S. (2018). When hackers err: The impacts of false positives on information security games. Decision Analysis, 15(2), 90-109.
Morgan, J. P. (1996). RiskMetricsTM-Technical Document (4th ed.). New York: Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York.
Nasiry, J., & Popescu, I. (2011). Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Operations Research, 59(6), 1361-1368.
Nikoofal, M. E., & Zhuang, J. (2011). Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker's private information. Risk Analysis, 32(5), 930-943.
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1971). Increasing risk II: Its economic consequences. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 66-84.
Wang, C., & Bier, V. M. (2011). Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multiattribute terrorist utility. Decision Analysis, 8(4), 286-302.
Wang, C., & Bier, V. M. (2016). Quantifying adversary capabilities to inform defensive resource allocation. Risk Analysis, 36(4), 756-775.
Willis, H. H., Morral, A. R., Kelly, T. K., & Medby, J. (2005). Estimating terrorism risk. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Winkler, R. L., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lichtendahl, Jr., K. C., & Jose, V. R. R. (2019). Probability forecasts and their combination: A research perspective. Decision Analysis, 16(4), 239-260.
Zhuang, J., & Bier, V. M. (2007). Balancing terrorism and natural disasters: Defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Operations Research, 55(5), 976-991.

Auteurs

Yucheng Dong (Y)

Center for Network Big Data and Decision-Making, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Xia Chen (X)

Center for Network Big Data and Decision-Making, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Kyle Hunt (K)

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Jun Zhuang (J)

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH