Absorbable fixation straps for laparoscopic gastropexy in dogs.


Journal

Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
Titre abrégé: Vet Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8113214

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
revised: 06 10 2020
received: 22 05 2020
accepted: 17 10 2020
pubmed: 12 11 2020
medline: 15 10 2021
entrez: 11 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic absorbable fixation straps (AFS) for laparoscopic gastropexy in dogs. Cadaveric and prospective clinical study. Five dog cadavers for the cadaveric study; 12 dogs for the clinical study. The pyloric antrum was affixed to the abdominal wall laparoscopically by applying a series of straps. The cadaveric study assessed potential challenges during the procedure and stomach mucosal penetration. For the clinical study, the total duration of surgery, time to complete the gastropexy, and the number of straps used were recorded. Ultrasound evidence of adhesion, complications, and weight were monitored at 7, 30, and 90 days after surgery. Owner satisfaction was evaluated at the 6-month follow-up. The total duration of surgery was 25.8 minutes (range, 19-39; SD, 6.7), and the time to complete the gastropexy was 10.1 minutes (range, 7-19; SD, 3.9). The linear regression analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the time to complete the gastropexy and the order of the surgeries (r Laparoscopic gastropexy with AFS was performed in both cadavers and clinical animals with minimal complications. Persistent adhesion was demonstrated during ultrasound evaluations and in one postmortem evaluation. This novel laparoscopic technique can be employed safely, effectively, and reasonably quickly, and the learning curve is expected to be relatively short.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33175434
doi: 10.1111/vsu.13543
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

O78-O88

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Références

Allen P, Paul A. Gastropexy for prevention of gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs: history and techniques. Top Companion Anim Med. 2014;29:77-80.
Haraguchi T, Kimura S, Itoh H, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain and inflammation reaction in dogs undergoing preventive laparoscopic-assisted and incisional gastropexy. J Vet Med Sci. 2017;79:1524-1531.
Tavakoli A, Mahmoodifard M, Razavifard AH. The superiority of paracostal endoscopic-assisted gastropexy over open incisional and belt loop gastropexy in dogs: a comparison of three prophylactic techniques. Iran J Vet Res. 2016;17:118-123.
Wilson ER, Henderson RA, Montgomery RD, Kincaid SA, Wright JC, Hanson RR. A comparison of laparoscopic and belt-loop gastropexy in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 1996;25(3):221-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1996.tb01403.x.
Balsa IM, Culp WTN, Drobatz KJ, Johnson EG, Mayhew PD, Marks SL. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy on gastrointestinal transit time in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2017;31(6):1680-1685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14816.
Dujowich M, Reimer SB. Evaluation of an endoscopically assisted gastropexy technique in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69:537-541.
Freeman LJ. Gastrointestinal laparoscopy in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009;39:903-924.
Rawlings CA, Mahaffey MB, Bement S, Canalis C. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs susceptible to gastric dilatation. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2002;221(11):1576-1581. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.221.1576.
Coleman KA, Adams S, Smeak DD, Monnet E. Laparoscopic gastropexy using knotless unidirectional suture and an articulated endoscopic suturing device: seven cases. Veterinary Surgery. 2016;45(S1):O95-O101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12570.
Coleman KA, Monnet E. Comparison of laparoscopic gastropexy performed via intracorporeal suturing with knotless unidirectional barbed suture using a needle driver versus a roticulated endoscopic suturing device: 30 cases. Vet Surg. 2017;46:1002-1007.
Mayhew PD, Brown DC. Prospective evaluation of two intracorporeally sutured prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy techniques compared with laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Vet Surg. 2009;38:738-746.
Runge JJ, Mayhew PD. Evaluation of single port access gastropexy and ovariectomy using articulating instruments and angled telescopes in dogs. Vet Surg. 2013;42:807-813.
Spah CE, Elkins AD, Wehrenberg A, et al. Evaluation of two novel self-anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots. Vet Surg. 2013;42:932-942.
Stiles M, Case JB, Coisman J. Elective gastropexy with a reusable single-incision laparoscopic surgery port in dogs: 14 cases (2012-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;249:299-303.
Takacs JD, Singh A, Case JB, et al. Total laparoscopic gastropexy using 1 simple continuous barbed suture line in 63 dogs. Vet Surg. 2017;46:233-241.
Belandria GA, Pavletic MM, Boulay JP, Penninck DG, Schwarz LA. Gastropexy with an automatic stapling instrument for the treatment of gastric dilatation and volvulus in 20 dogs. Can Vet J. 2009;50:733-740.
Benitez ME, Schmiedt CW, Radlinsky MG, Cornell KK. Efficacy of incisional gastropexy for prevention of GDV in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2013;49:185-189.
Gazzola KM, Nelson LL, Fritz MC, Clancy MR, Hauptman JG. Effects of prophylactic incisional gastropexy on markers of gastric motility in dogs as determined by use of a novel wireless motility device. Am J Vet Res. 2017;78:100-106.
Hammel SP, Novo RE. Recurrence of gastric dilatation-volvulus after incisional gastropexy in a rottweiler. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2006;42:147-150.
Ward MP, Patronek GJ, Glickman LT. Benefits of prophylactic gastropexy for dogs at risk of gastric dilatation-volvulus. Prev Vet Med. 2003;60:319-329.
Deroy C, Hahn H, Bismuth C, Poncet C. Simplified minimally invasive surgical approach for prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy in 21 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2019;55:152-159.
Mathon DH, Dossin O, Palierne S, et al. A laparoscopic-sutured gastropexy technique in dogs: mechanical and functional evaluation. Vet Surg. 2009;38:967-974.
Arbaugh M, Case JB, Monnet E. Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy. Vet Surg. 2013;42:205-209.
Imhoff DJ, Cohen A, Monnet E. Biomechanical analysis of laparoscopic incisional gastropexy with intracorporeal suturing using knotless polyglyconate. Vet Surg. 2015;44(Suppl 1):39-43.
Webb RJ, Monnet E. Influence of length of incision and number of suture lines on the biomechanical properties of incisional gastropexy. Vet Surg. 2019;48:933-937.
Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Ventralight ST and SorbaFix versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a porcine model. JSLS. 2013;17:549-559.
Fracassi L, Crovace AM, Staffieri F, Lacitignola L. Biomechanical evaluation of an absorbable fixation strap for use in total laparoscopic gastropexy in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2020;81:594-599.
Doerner J, Fiorbianco V, Dupre G. Intercostal insertion of Veress needle for canine laparoscopic procedures: a cadaver study. Vet Surg. 2012;41:362-366.
Fiorbianco V, Skalicky M, Doerner J, Katic N, Schramel JP, Dupré G. Right intercostal insertion of a Veress needle for laparoscopy in dogs. Vet Surg. 2012;41:367-373.
Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW, et al. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1999;6:181-198.
Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F. Pros and cons of tacking in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:136-140.
Dujowich M, Keller ME, Reimer SB. Evaluation of short- and long-term complications after endoscopically assisted gastropexy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;236:177-182.
Rawlings CA. Laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2002;38:15-19.
Leonardi F, Properzi R, Rosa J, et al. Combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy versus combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and total laparoscopic gastropexy: a comparison of surgical time, complications and postoperative pain in dogs. Vet Med Sci. 2020;6(3):321-329.
Loy Son NK, Singh A, Amsellem P, et al. Long-term outcome and complications following prophylactic laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Vet Surg. 2016;45:O77-O83.

Auteurs

Luca Lacitignola (L)

Dipartimento Dell'Emergenze e trapianti di Organo, sez Cliniche Veterinarie e PA, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Laura Fracassi (L)

Dipartimento Dell'Emergenze e trapianti di Organo, sez Cliniche Veterinarie e PA, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Caterina Di Bella (C)

Scuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

Nicola Zizzo (N)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, sez Anatomia Patologica, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Giuseppe Passantino (G)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, sez Anatomia Patologica, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Antonella Tinelli (A)

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, sez Anatomia Patologica, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Alberto Maria Crovace (AM)

Scuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

Francesco Staffieri (F)

Dipartimento Dell'Emergenze e trapianti di Organo, sez Cliniche Veterinarie e PA, Università degli studi di Bari, Valenzano, Bari, Italy.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH