Adverse Events in Intensive Care and Continuing Care Units During Bed-Bath Procedures: The Prospective Observational NURSIng during critical carE (NURSIE) Study.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2021
01 01 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
entrez:
12
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Standard nursing interventions, especially bed-baths, in ICUs can lead to complications or adverse events defined as a physiologic change that can be life-threatening or that prolongs hospitalization. However, the frequency and type of these adverse events are rarely reported in the literature. The primary objective of our study was to describe the proportion of patients experiencing at least one serious adverse event during bed-bath. The secondary objectives were to determine the incidence of each type of serious adverse event and identify risk factors for these serious adverse events. Prospective multicenter observational study. Twenty-four ICUs in France, Belgium, and Luxembourg. The patients included in this study had been admitted to an ICU for less than 72 hours and required at least one of the following treatments: invasive ventilation, vasopressors, noninvasive ventilation, high-flow oxygen therapy. Serious adverse events were defined as cardiac arrest, accidental extubation, desaturation and/or mucus plugging/inhalation, hypotension and/or arrhythmia and/or agitation requiring therapeutic intervention, acute pain, accidental disconnection or dysfunction of equipment, and patient fall requiring additional assistance. None. The study included 253 patients from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018 in 24 ICUs, representing 1,529 nursing procedures. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 54 ± 19. Nursing care was administered by an average of 2 ± 1 caregivers and lasted between 11 and 20 minutes. Of the 253 patients included, 142 (56%) experienced at least one serious adverse event. Of the 1,529 nursing procedures, 295 (19%) were complicated by at least one serious adverse event. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with serious adverse event were as follows: presence of a specific protocol (p = 0.011); tracheostomy (p = 0.032); administration of opioids (p = 0.007); presence of a physician (p = 0.0004); duration of nursing care between 6 and 10 minutes (p = 0.003), duration of nursing care between 11 and 20 minutes (p = 0.005), duration of nursing care greater than 40 minutes (p = 0.04) with a reference duration of nursing care between 20 and 40 minutes. Serious adverse events were observed in one-half of patients and concerned one-fifth of nurses, confirming the need for caution. Further studies are needed to test systematic serious adverse event prevention strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33177361
pii: 00003246-202101000-00022
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004745
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20-e30Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Brouard F, Muller G, Michel P, et al. Étude du transport INTrA-hospitalier du MAlade de réanimation (TINTAHMAR). Réanimation. 2016; 25:161–170
Coyer FM, O’Sullivan J, Cadman N. The provision of patient personal hygiene in the intensive care unit: A descriptive exploratory study of bed-bathing practice. Aust Crit Care. 2011; 24:198–209
Rising CJ. The relationship of selected nursing activities to ICP. J Neurosci Nurs. 1993; 25:302–308
Boortz-Marx R. Factors affecting intracranial pressure: A descriptive study. J Neurosurg Nurs. 1985; 17:89–94
de Jong A, Molinari N, de Lattre S, et al. Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: A prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project). Crit Care. 2013; 17:R74
Engström J, Bruno E, Reinius H, et al. Physiological changes associated with routine nursing procedures in critically ill are common: An observational pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017; 61:62–72
Robles Rangil MP, Córcoles Gallego T, Torres Lizcano M, et al. Frecuencia de eventos adversos durante el aseo del paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva. 2002; 13:47–56
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993; 270:2957–2963
Morris AH. Treatment algorithms and protocolized care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003; 9:236–240
Claassen J, Velazquez A, Meyers E, et al. Bedside quantitative electroencephalography improves assessment of consciousness in comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Ann Neurol. 2016; 80:541–553
Chanques G, Payen JF, Mercier G, et al. Assessing pain in non-intubated critically ill patients unable to self report: An adaptation of the behavioral pain scale. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35:2060–2067
Lewis P, Nichols E, Mackey G, et al. The effect of turning and backrub on mixed venous oxygen saturation in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 1997; 6:132–140
Bailey P, Thomsen GE, Spuhler VJ, et al. Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35:139–145
Pohlman MC, Schweickert WD, Pohlman AS, et al. Feasibility of physical and occupational therapy beginning from initiation of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:2089–2094
Krishnagopalan S, Johnson EW, Low LL, et al. Body positioning of intensive care patients: clinical practice versus standards. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30:2588–2592
Goldhill DR, Badacsonyi A, Goldhill AA, et al. A prospective observational study of ICU patient position and frequency of turning. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63:509–515
Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. PROSEVA Study Group: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:2159–2168
Kalfon P, Baumstarck K, Estagnasie P, et al. IPREA Study group: A tailored multicomponent program to reduce discomfort in critically ill patients: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43:1829–1840
Wickström G, Bendix T. Commentary. Scandinavian J Work Environment Health. 2000; 26:363–367
Bucknall TK. Critical care nurses’ decision-making activities in the natural clinical setting. J Clin Nurs. 2000; 9:25–35
Aitken LM. Critical care nurses’ use of decision-making strategies. J Clin Nurs. 2003; 12:476–483
Currey J, Botti M. The influence of patient complexity and nurses’ experience on haemodynamic decision-making following cardiac surgery. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006; 22:194–205
Forster AJ, Kyeremanteng K, Hooper J, et al. The impact of adverse events in the intensive care unit on hospital mortality and length of stay. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:259
Reignier J, Feral-Pierssens AL, Boulain T, et al. French Society of Emergency Medicine (Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence, SFMU) and French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF): Withholding and withdrawing life-support in adults in emergency care: Joint position paper from the French intensive care society and French society of emergency medicine. Ann Intensive Care. 2019; 9:105
Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, et al. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981; 71:694–705