Disparity of time-contrast curves generated by various types of power injectors used in magnetic resonance imaging.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 11 2020
11 11 2020
Historique:
received:
29
06
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
12
11
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The profiles of time-contrast (TC) -curves from popular MRI injectors derived at the injection site of the attached tube-line system were compared. Variations of TC-profiles were previously reported to potentially influence image quality in time critical MRI measurements. TC-curves from five injectors obtained during commonly used injection protocols were assessed according to representative quality criteria: (1) correlation strength between a fitted boxcar function and the TC-curve (cBCF) and (2) difference between true and expected injection time (dBIT). Additionally, the impact from technical injector properties: pump type, line volume, maximum injection power and type of contrast medium (CM) on the TC-profiles was evaluated. Injectors using a piston-syrinx (PS) mechanism for CM-injection performed significantly better than those working with a peristaltic roller pump (RP) technique. Besides injection mechanism, line filling volume showed a strong influence on the final TC-curves, where larger filling volumes induced worse cBCF- and dBIT-results. Therefore, to achieve an optimal bolus in clinical MRI use of a PS-injector seems recommendable. Besides their pump mechanism, RP-injectors appeared additionally hampered by their high volume line systems, pointing out an unfavourable coinicidence of these technical features in RP-injectors. This should be considered, particularly, in comparative or time-critical MRI-studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33177570
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76536-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-76536-x
pmc: PMC7658966
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19568Références
Invest Radiol. 2017 Sep;52(9):547-553
pubmed: 28448310
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2006 May-Jun;1(3):128-37
pubmed: 17193689
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015 Jan-Mar;25(1):2-10
pubmed: 25709157
Radiol Technol. 2019 Mar;90(4):344-352
pubmed: 30886031
Magn Reson Insights. 2017 Apr 20;10:1178623X17705894
pubmed: 28579796
Rofo. 2005 May;177(5):646-54
pubmed: 15871079