A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
accepted:
19
08
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
7
2
2021
entrez:
12
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wavelength is a physical measure of light, and the intricate understanding of its link to perceived colour enables the creation of perceptual entities such as metamers-non-overlapping spectral compositions that generate identical colour percepts
Identifiants
pubmed: 33177711
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2891-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-2891-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
118-123Références
Wandell, B. A. Foundations of Vision (Sinauer Associates, 1995).
Bell, A. G. Discovery and invention. Natl Geogr. Mag. 25, 649–655 (1914).
Snitz, K. et al. Predicting odor perceptual similarity from odor structure. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003184 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003184
Khan, R. M. et al. Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J. Neurosci. 27, 10015–10023 (2007).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-07.2007
Zarzo, M. & Stanton, D. T. Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers’ odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 225–247 (2009).
doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.225
Koulakov, A. A., Kolterman, B. E., Enikolopov, A. G. & Rinberg, D. In search of the structure of human olfactory space. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 65 (2011).
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00065
Keller, A. et al. Predicting human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules. Science 355, 820–826 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aal2014
Weiss, T. et al. Perceptual convergence of multi-component mixtures in olfaction implies an olfactory white. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19959–19964 (2012).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208110109
Zhou, Y., Smith, B. H. & Sharpee, T. O. Hyperbolic geometry of the olfactory space. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1458 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1458
Cain, W. S. Odor intensity: differences in the exponent of the psychophysical function. Percept. Psychophys. 6, 349–354 (1969).
doi: 10.3758/BF03212789
Olsson, M. J. An integrated model of intensity and quality of odor mixtures. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 855, 837–840 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10672.x
Halpern, S. D., Andrews, T. J. & Purves, D. Interindividual variation in human visual performance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 521–534 (1999).
doi: 10.1162/089892999563580
Thiede, T. et al. PEAQ—the ITU standard for objective measurement of perceived audio quality. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 48, 3–29 (2000).
Yuhong, Y. et al. Auditory attention based mobile audio quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1389–1393 (IEEE, 2014).
Bushdid, C., Magnasco, M. O., Vosshall, L. B. & Keller, A. Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science 343, 1370–1372 (2014).
doi: 10.1126/science.1249168
Cain, W. S. Differential sensitivity for smell: “noise” at the nose. Science 195, 796–798 (1977).
doi: 10.1126/science.836592
Booth, D. A. & Freeman, R. P. Discriminative feature integration by individuals. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 84, 1–16 (1993).
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90068-3
Prins, N. Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction (Academic, 2016).
Ennis, J. M., Ennis, D. M., Yip, D. & O’Mahony, M. Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 51, 205–215 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1998.tb00677.x
Ennis, D. M. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sens. Stud. 8, 353–370 (1993).
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1993.tb00225.x
Hamwi, V. & Landis, C. Memory for color. J. Psychol. 39, 183–194 (1955).
doi: 10.1080/00223980.1955.9916168
Rousseau, B. Meyer, A. & O’Mahony, M. Power and sensitivity of the same‐different test: comparison with triangle and duo‐trio methods. J. Sens. Stud. 13, 149–173 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1998.tb00080.x
Stillman, J. A. & Irwin, R. J. Advantages of the same‐different method over the triangular method for the measurement of taste discrimination. J. Sens. Stud. 10, 261–272 (1995).
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1995.tb00018.x
Laska, M. & Teubner, P. Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for ten pairs of enantiomers. Chem. Senses 24, 161–170 (1999).
doi: 10.1093/chemse/24.2.161
Sela, L. & Sobel, N. Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness. Exp. Brain Res. 205, 13–29 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2348-6
Mainland, J. D. et al. The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 114–120 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nn.3598
Brainard, D. H. & Hurlbert, A. C. Colour vision: understanding #TheDress. Curr. Biol. 25, R551–R554 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.020
Jameson, D. & Hurvich, L. M. Theoretical analysis of anomalous trichromatic color vision. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 1075–1089 (1956).
doi: 10.1364/JOSA.46.001075
Rüfer, F. et al. Age-corrected reference values for the Heidelberg multi-color anomaloscope. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 250, 1267–1273 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1949-0
Meister, M. On the dimensionality of odor space. eLife 4, e07865 (2015).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.07865
Gerkin, R. C. & Castro, J. B. The number of olfactory stimuli that humans can discriminate is still unknown. eLife 4, e08127 (2015).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.08127
Mamlouk, A. M., Chee-Ruiter, C., Hofmann, U. G. & Bower, J. M. Quantifying olfactory perception: mapping olfactory perception space by using multidimensional scaling and self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing 52–54, 591–597 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00805-6
Fan, M., Qiao, H. & Zhang, B. Intrinsic dimension estimation of manifolds by incising balls. Pattern Recognit. 42, 780–787 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.09.016
Camastra, F. Data dimensionality estimation methods: a survey. Pattern Recognit. 36, 2945–2954 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00176-6
Haddad, R. et al. Global features of neural activity in the olfactory system form a parallel code that predicts olfactory behavior and perception. J. Neurosci. 30, 9017–9026 (2010).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0398-10.2010
Kleiner, M. et al. What's new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36, 1–16 (2007).
Pelli, D. G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437–442 (1997).
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
Brainard, D. H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
Dragon: software for the calculation of molecular descriptors v.6.0 (Talete srl, 2011).
Macmillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. Detection Theory: A User’s Guide (Psychology Press, 2004).
Rousseau, B. & Ennis, D. M. A Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination method. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1083–1090 (2001).
doi: 10.3758/BF03194526
Kaplan, H. L., Macmillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. Tables of d′ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. 10, 796–813 (1978).
doi: 10.3758/BF03205405