The Frequency and Content of Discussions About Alcohol Use in Primary Care and Application of the Chief Medical Officer's Low-Risk Drinking Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Survey of General Practitioners and Practice Nurses in the UK.


Journal

Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)
ISSN: 1464-3502
Titre abrégé: Alcohol Alcohol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8310684

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 13 03 2020
revised: 18 09 2020
accepted: 12 10 2020
pubmed: 13 11 2020
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 12 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To examine how often general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) working in primary care discuss alcohol with patients, what factors prompt discussions, how they approach patient discussions and whether the Chief Medical Officers' (CMO) revised low-risk drinking guidelines are appropriately advised. Cross-sectional survey with GPs and PNs working in primary care in the UK, conducted January-March 2017 (n = 2020). A vignette exercise examined what factors would prompt a discussion about alcohol, whether they would discuss before or after a patient reported exceeded the revised CMO guidelines (14 units per week) and whether the CMO drinking guidelines were appropriately advised. For all patients, participants were asked how often they discussed alcohol and how they approached the discussion (e.g. used screening tool). The most common prompts to discuss alcohol in the vignette exercise were physical cues (44.7% of participants) or alcohol-related symptoms (23.8%). Most practitioners (70.1%) said they would wait until a patient was exceeding CMO guidelines before instigating discussion. Two-fifths (38.1%) appropriately advised the CMO guidelines in the vignette exercise, with PNs less likely to do so than GPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, P = 0.03). Less than half (44.7%) reportedly asked about alcohol always/often with all patients, with PNs more likely to ask always/often than GPs (OR = 2.22, P < 0.001). Almost three-quarters said they would enquire by asking about units (70.3%), compared to using screening tools. Further research is required to identify mechanisms to increase the frequency of discussions about alcohol and appropriate recommendation of the CMO drinking guidelines to patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33179022
pii: 5974946
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa120
pmc: PMC7613882
mid: EMS157626
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

433-442

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12015/4
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press.

Références

J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Sep;33(3):412-21
pubmed: 21169370
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):28-32
pubmed: 25583889
Alcohol Alcohol. 2002 Jan-Feb;37(1):38-42
pubmed: 11825855
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2:CD004148
pubmed: 29476653
Alcohol Alcohol. 2013 Mar-Apr;48(2):180-8
pubmed: 23015608
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jan;66(642):e1-9
pubmed: 26719481
J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(4):426-39
pubmed: 16671972
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e013804
pubmed: 27909041
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 25;17(1):165
pubmed: 27887577
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):111
pubmed: 32552861
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2323-2330
pubmed: 27059888
Addiction. 2016 Jul;111(7):1203-13
pubmed: 26948693
Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2287-323
pubmed: 26364544
Lancet. 2009 Jun 27;373(9682):2223-33
pubmed: 19560604
BMJ. 2019 May 7;365:l1999
pubmed: 31064761
Nurs Stand. 2013 Aug 14-20;27(50):42-6
pubmed: 23944824
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 20;14:121
pubmed: 23961835
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):549-556
pubmed: 28977621
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Apr 28;15:74
pubmed: 24766913
Br J Cancer. 2018 Apr;118(8):1130-1141
pubmed: 29567982
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76 Suppl:S33-8
pubmed: 25514547
Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1015-1035
pubmed: 30146330
Addiction. 2020 Jan;115(1):49-60
pubmed: 31599022
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:93-9
pubmed: 26130336
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 07;6(7):e010951
pubmed: 27388356
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Dec 18;19(1):200
pubmed: 30563475
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 28;14(4):
pubmed: 28350364
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):1076-81
pubmed: 23444427

Auteurs

Jack M Birch (JM)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical, Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Nathan Critchlow (N)

Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.
Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Lynn Calman (L)

Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Robert Petty (R)

Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.

Gillian Rosenberg (G)

Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.

Harriet Rumgay (H)

Cancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.

Jyotsna Vohra (J)

Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1JQ, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH