The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Computed tomography
Interobserver agreement
Intraobserver agreement
Lumbar foraminal stenosis
Magnetic resonance imaging
Novel classification system
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
21
09
2020
accepted:
01
11
2020
revised:
21
10
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
12
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No clinical CT-based classification system is currently in use for lumbar foraminal stenosis. MRI scanners are not easily available, are expensive and may be contraindicated in an increasing number of patients. This study aimed to propose and evaluate the reproducibility of a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis. The grading was developed as four grades: normal foramen-Grade 0, anteroposterior (AP)/superoinferior (SI) (single plane) fat compression-Grade 1, both AP/SI compression (two planes) without distortion of nerve root-Grade 2 and Grade 2 with distortion of nerve root-Grade 3. A total of 800 lumbar foramen of a cohort of 100 random patients over the age of 60 who had undergone both CT and MRI scans were reviewed by two radiologists independently to assess agreement of the novel CT classification against the MRI-based grading system of Lee et al. Interobserver(n = 400) and intraobserver agreement(n = 160) was also evaluated. Agreement analysis was performed using the weighted kappa statistic. A total of 100 patients (M:F = 45:55) with a mean age of 68.5 years (range 60-83 years were included in the study. The duration between CT and MRI scans was 98 days (range 0-540, SD-108). There was good correlation between CT and MRI with kappa scores (k = 0.81) and intraobserver kappa of 0.89 and 0.98 for the two readers. The novel CT-based classification correlates well with the MRI grading system and can safely and accurately replace it where required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33179129
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06656-5
pii: 10.1007/s00586-020-06656-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
865-869Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Orita S, Inage K, Eguchi Y et al (2016) Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1. Eur J OrthopSurgTraumatol 26:685–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1806-7
doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1806-7
Porter RW, Hibbert CEC (1984) The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine 9:418–421 ((Phila Pa 1976))
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198405000-00017
Kunogi JHM (1991) Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine 16:1312–1320 ((Phila Pa 1976))
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
Jenis LG, An HS (2000) Spine update: lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 25:389–394 ((Phila Pa 1976))
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
Putti V (1927) New conceptions in the pathogenesis of sciatic pain. Lancet 210:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)30667-0
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)30667-0
Mitchell C (1934) Lumbosacral facetectomy for relief of sciatic pain. J Bone JtSurg Br 36-B:230–237
Burton CV, Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Yong-Hing KHK (1981) Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. ClinOrthopRelat Res 157:183–187
Jenis LG, An HSGR (2001) Foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine: a review of 65 surgical cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 30:205–211
Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S, Schmid MR, Romanowski B, Benini A, Böni T, Hodler J (1998) Lumbar spine: quantitive and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology 207:391–398
doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577486
Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim K-J, Kim H-J, SooKyo Chung HSK (2010) A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1095–1098
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772
Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Rho MH, Hong HP, Kwag HJ, Kook SH, Choi SH (2012) Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 33:818–822
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2870
No authors listed (2017) Geographical distribution of MRI—Figure 5: distribution of MRI units across Canada in 2017. In: Can. Med. Imaging Invent. 2017. https://www.cadth.ca/canadian-medical-imaging-inventory-2017 . Accessed 20 Oct 2020
Matsumoto KS, Kashima S, Awai K (2015) Geographic distribution of CT, MRI and PET devices in Japan: a longitudinal analysis based on national census data. PLoS ONE 10:e0126036. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126036
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126036
pubmed: 25946125
pmcid: 4422695
Khaliq AA, Deyo D, Duszak R Jr (2015) The impact of hospital characteristics on the availability of radiology services at critical access hospitals. J Am CollRadiol 12:1351–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.008
Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM et al (2008) Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. AcadEmerg Med 15:780–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00192.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00192.x
No Authors Listed (2011) Pakistan country report. In: RAD-AID-Pakistan-health-care-radiology-report
Moser JW (2008) 2007 Survey of radiologists: practice characteristics, ownership, and affiliation with imaging centers. J Am CollRadiol 5:965–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2008.03.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.03.011
No authors listed (2014) Medical equipment: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) units per million population. In: World Heal. Organ. https://www.who.int/diagnostic_imaging/collaboration/mripermill_14.jpg?ua=1 . Accessed 20 Oct 2020
No authors listed (2016) Global health observatory data repository—Medical equipment—Data by country. In: World Heal. Organ. https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.510 . Accessed 20 Oct 2020
Rinck PA (2020) 21–02 How many MRI machines are there?—MR imaging: facts and figures. In: Rinck PA (ed) Magnetic resonance in medicine a critical introduction, 12th edn. BoD, Germany, p 432
Dill T (2008) Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 94:943–948. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.125039
doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.125039
pubmed: 18552230
Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232:635–652
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2323030830
Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256
doi: 10.1037/h0026256
pubmed: 19673146
McHugh ML (2012) Lessons in biostatistics Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. BiochemMedica 22:276–282
SPSS version 24, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois U SPSS version 24
Stephens M, Evans J, O’Brien J (1991) Lumbar intervertebral foramens: an in vitro study of their shape in relation to intervertebral disc pathology. Spine 16:525–529 ((Phila Pa 1976))
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199105000-00007
Macnab I (1971) Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone JtSurg Am 53:891–903
doi: 10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004
Mandell JC, Czuczman GJ, Gaviola GC et al (2017) The lumbar neural foramen and transforaminal epidural steroid injections: an anatomic review with key safety considerations in planning the percutaneous approach. Am J Roentgenol 209:W26–W35. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17471
doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17471
Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J et al (1976) Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. ClinOrthopRelat Res 115:4–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197603000-00002
doi: 10.1097/00003086-197603000-00002
Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM (1993) Imaging anatomy of the lateral lumbar spinal canal. Semin Ultrasound, CT, MRI 14:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2171(05)80034-4
doi: 10.1016/S0887-2171(05)80034-4
Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine 32:896–903. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000259809.75760.d5 ((Phila Pa 1976))
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259809.75760.d5
pubmed: 17426636
Eguchi Y, Ohtori S, Suzuki M et al (2016) Diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis using diffusion tensor imaging. Asian Spine J 10:164–169. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.164
doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.164
pubmed: 26949473
pmcid: 4764530
Ogbole GI, Adeyomoye AO, Badu-Peprah A et al (2018) Survey of magnetic resonance imaging availability in West Africa. Pan Afr Med J 30:240
doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.240.14000
Adejoh T, Onwujekwe EC, Abba M et al (2018) Computed tomography scanner census and adult head dose in Nigeria. Egypt J RadiolNucl Med 49:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.09.001
Hricak H, Amparo EG (1984) Body MRI: alleviation of claustrophobia by prone positioning. Radiology 152:819. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.152.3.6463267
doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.3.6463267
pubmed: 6463267
Quirk ME, Letendre AJ, Ciottone RA, Lingley JF (1989) Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Med Dosim 14:294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-3947(89)90021-6
doi: 10.1016/0958-3947(89)90021-6
Meléndez JC, Mccrank E (1993) Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 270:745–747. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510060091039
doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510060091039
Katznelson R, Djaiani GN, Minkovich L et al (2008) Prevalence of claustrophobia and magnetic resonance imaging after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 4:487–493. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s2699
doi: 10.2147/ndt.s2699
pubmed: 18728736
pmcid: 2518378
Koh SAS, Lee W, Rahmat R et al (2017) Interethnic variation in the prevalence of claustrophobia during MRI at Singapore general hospital: does a wider bore MR scanner help? ProcSingapHealthc 26:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105817695819
doi: 10.1177/2010105817695819
Beers GJ, Carter AP, Leiter BE et al (1985) Interobserver discrepancies in distance measurements from lumbar spine CT scans. Am J Roentgenol 144:395–398. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.144.2.395
doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.2.395
Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Aaron C et al (1989) A morphometric study of the lumbar foramen—Influence of flexion-extension movements and of isolated disc collapse. SurgRadiolAnat 11:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096463
doi: 10.1007/BF02096463
No authors listed (2019) Radiation dose in X-ray and CT exams. In: RadiologyInfo.org. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray . Accessed 20 Oct 2020
de Gonzalez AB, Mahesh M, Kim K-P et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040
pmcid: 6276814
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.Radiation
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.Radiation
pubmed: 20008690
pmcid: 4635397
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
pubmed: 22681860
pmcid: 3418594
Lin EC (2010) Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo ClinProc 85:1142–1146. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0260
doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0260
Sagerman RH (1993) Radiation-induced cataracts: simple but difficultto quantify. Int J RadiatOncolBiolPhys 26:713–714
Takeda A, Shigematsu N, Suzuki S et al (1999) Late retinal complications of radiation therapy for nasal and paranasal malignancies: relationship between irradiated-dose area and severity. Int J RadiatOncolBiolPhys 44:599–605