Recommended core outcome instruments for health-related quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity in atopic eczema trials: results of the HOME VII consensus meeting.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez: 12 11 2020
pubmed: 13 11 2020
medline: 13 11 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of domains for atopic eczema clinical trials. Previous consensus meetings have agreed upon preferred instruments for clinician-reported signs (Eczema Area and Severity Index - EASI) and patient-reported symptoms (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure - POEM). This paper reports consensus decisions from the HOME VII meeting. To complete the core outcome set for atopic eczema by agreeing upon core outcome instruments for the domains of quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity. Face-to-face consensus meeting held in Tokyo, Japan (8 It was agreed by consensus that quality of life should be measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for adults, the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for children, and the Infant's Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) for infants. For long-term control, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) instrument or the Atopic Dermatitis Control Test (ADCT) should be used. Consensus was not reached over the frequency of data collection for long-term control. The peak itch numerical rating scale(NRS)-11 past 24 hours was recommended as an additional instrument for the symptom domain in trials of older children and adults. Agreement was reached that all core outcome instruments should be captured at baseline and at the time of primary outcome assessment as a minimum. For now, the core outcome set for clinical trials in atopic eczema is complete. The specified domains and instruments should be used in all new clinical trials and systematic reviews of eczema treatments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of domains for atopic eczema clinical trials. Previous consensus meetings have agreed upon preferred instruments for clinician-reported signs (Eczema Area and Severity Index - EASI) and patient-reported symptoms (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure - POEM). This paper reports consensus decisions from the HOME VII meeting.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To complete the core outcome set for atopic eczema by agreeing upon core outcome instruments for the domains of quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity.
METHODS METHODS
Face-to-face consensus meeting held in Tokyo, Japan (8
RESULTS RESULTS
It was agreed by consensus that quality of life should be measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for adults, the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for children, and the Infant's Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) for infants. For long-term control, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) instrument or the Atopic Dermatitis Control Test (ADCT) should be used. Consensus was not reached over the frequency of data collection for long-term control. The peak itch numerical rating scale(NRS)-11 past 24 hours was recommended as an additional instrument for the symptom domain in trials of older children and adults. Agreement was reached that all core outcome instruments should be captured at baseline and at the time of primary outcome assessment as a minimum.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For now, the core outcome set for clinical trials in atopic eczema is complete. The specified domains and instruments should be used in all new clinical trials and systematic reviews of eczema treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33179283
doi: 10.1111/bjd.19673
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

K S Thomas (KS)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

C A Apfelbacher (CA)

Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

J R Chalmers (JR)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

E Simpson (E)

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

P I Spuls (PI)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

L A A Gerbens (LAA)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

H C Williams (HC)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

J Schmitt (J)

Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.

M Gabes (M)

Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

L Howells (L)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

B L Stuart (BL)

Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

E Grinich (E)

School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

T Pawlitschek (T)

School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

T Burton (T)

Patient Representative (independent), Nottingham, United Kingdom.

L Howie (L)

Global Parents for Eczema Research, Brisbane, Australia.

A Gadkari (A)

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc, Germany.

L Eckert (L)

Global Dupixent Business Partner, sanofi GHEVA, 1 av. Pierre Brossolette, 91 380, Chilly Mazatin, France.

T Ebata (T)

Chitofuna Dermatology Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.

M Boers (M)

Department of Epidemiology and data Science; Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

H Saeki (H)

Department of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

T Nakahara (T)

Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

N Katoh (N)

Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Classifications MeSH