Penile prosthesis implant in the management of Peyronies' disease.


Journal

Minerva urology and nephrology
ISSN: 2724-6442
Titre abrégé: Minerva Urol Nephrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 13 11 2020
medline: 22 7 2021
entrez: 12 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Penile prosthesis implantation (PPI), performed with or without adjunct straightening techniques, is one of the available surgical options in cases of Peyronie's disease (PD) with concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of the study was to systematically identify and evaluate evidence regarding IPP in patients with PD and ED. Using Cochrane's methodological recommendations on systematic reviews, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on clinical research regarding the use of PPI, alone or in combination with any straightening maneuvers in the treatment of patients with PD and ED. The search was carried until January 2020. We included studies in English language with primary population patients with PD and ED who underwent IPP with the intent to treat the PD. All studies that were not original clinical research articles, reported insufficient data or included fewer than 5 patients were excluded from the final analysis. In total 43 clinical articles with more than 2000 patients (N.=2143) investigating the effects of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) for the treatment of PD with or without ED were included in the study. Depending on the severity of the penile curvature, additional penile deformities (i.e. hourglass deformity), penile length, prior operations and surgeons experience, 6 main categories of surgical techniques of PPI for penile straightening and treatment of PD were identified: PPI only, PPI with modelling of the penis, PPI with plication of the penis on the convex side of the curvature, PPI with plaque incision(s), PPI with plaque incision/excision plus grafting and PPI with grafting and penile lengthening. Overall, patients with PD and ED can expect excellent outcomes with PPI against a minimal risk of side effects. No definite conclusions can be made regarding which technique is superior.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33179867
pii: S0393-2249.20.03890-4
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03890-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

196-214

Auteurs

Paolo Verze (P)

Unit of Urology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy - pverze@unisa.it.

Ioannis Sokolakis (I)

Department of Urology, Martha-Maria Hospital of Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

Celeste Manfredi (C)

Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Department of Urology 12 Octubre University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain

Claudia Collà Ruvolo (C)

Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

Georgios Hatzichristodoulou (G)

Department of Urology, Martha-Maria Hospital of Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

Javier Romero-Otero (J)

Department of Urology 12 Octubre University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
Department of Urology, University Hospital HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH