Morphometric Assessment of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, an Ex-Vivo Pilot Study.
confocal laser endomicroscopy
endoscopic ultrasound
pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Nov 2020
10 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
revised:
02
11
2020
accepted:
07
11
2020
entrez:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
14
11
2020
medline:
14
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ex-vivo freshly surgical removed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) specimens were assessed using pCLE and then processed for paraffin embeding and histopathological diagnostic in an endeavour to find putative image analysis algorithms that might recognise adenocarcinoma. Twelve patients diagnosed with PDAC on endoscopic ultrasound and FNA confirmation underwent surgery. Removed samples were sprayed with acriflavine as contrast agent, underwent pCLE with an experimental probe and compared with previous recordings of normal pancreatic tissue. Subsequently, all samples were subjected to cross-sectional histopathology, including surgical resection margins for controls. pCLE records, as well as corespondant cytokeratin-targeted immunohistochemistry images were processed using the same morphological classifiers in the Image ProPlus AMS image analysis software. Specific morphometric classifiers were automatically generated on all images: Area, Hole Area (HA), Perimeter, Roundness, Integrated Optical Density (IOD), Fractal Dimension (FD), Ferret max (Fmax), Ferret mean (Fmean), Heterogeneity and Clumpiness. After histopathological confirmation of adenocarcinoma areas, we have found that the same morphological classifiers could clearly differentiate between tumor and non-tumor areas on both pathology and correspondand pCLE (area, roundness, IOD, ferret and heterogeneity ( This pilot study proves that classical morphometrical classifiers can clearly differentiate adenocarcimoma on pCLE data, and the implementation in a live image-analysis algorithm might help in improving the specificity of pCLE in vivo diagnostic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33182544
pii: diagnostics10110923
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110923
pmc: PMC7696051
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Transl Oncol. 2017 Feb;10(1):59-69
pubmed: 27987431
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Jan 20;10(1):
pubmed: 29361690
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 28;22(4):1701-10
pubmed: 26819534
Endoscopy. 2012 Mar;44(3):251-7
pubmed: 22261749
Endoscopy. 2006 Dec;38(12):1275-83
pubmed: 17163333
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 May;62(5):1346-1353
pubmed: 28281172
Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):882-91
pubmed: 21818734
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 May;67(6):843-53
pubmed: 18440377
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jan;4(1):E17-23
pubmed: 26793780
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jun;58(6):1784-9
pubmed: 23314855
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 28;22(44):9694-9705
pubmed: 27956793
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):517-24
pubmed: 19597774
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jun;128(7):2119-23
pubmed: 15940642
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1049-60
pubmed: 21924718
Anticancer Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1B):353-60
pubmed: 18383869
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jan;6(1):E78-E85
pubmed: 29344564
Endoscopy. 2016 Oct;48(10):892-8
pubmed: 27576181
J Biophotonics. 2011 Jan;4(1-2):108-13
pubmed: 20533429
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):644-654.e2
pubmed: 28286093
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr 21;13(15):2160-5
pubmed: 17465494
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):371-8
pubmed: 19683597
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;31(5):548-52
pubmed: 20002025