Cell Type-Specific Adhesion and Migration on Laser-Structured Opaque Surfaces.
3T3 Cells
Animals
Biocompatible Materials
Cell Adhesion
/ physiology
Cell Movement
/ physiology
Cell Shape
/ physiology
Cells, Cultured
Cytoskeleton
/ physiology
Fibroblasts
/ cytology
Focal Adhesions
/ physiology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Lasers
Materials Testing
Mice
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
NIH 3T3 Cells
Osteoblasts
/ cytology
Surface Properties
Titanium
biomaterials
cell exclusion assay
cell proliferation
cell spreading
cytocompatibility
focal adhesion
in vitro screening
primary vs. immortalized cell lines
spike structures
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Nov 2020
10 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
revised:
02
11
2020
accepted:
03
11
2020
entrez:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
14
11
2020
medline:
6
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cytocompatibility is essential for implant approval. However, initial in vitro screenings mainly include the quantity of adherent immortalized cells and cytotoxicity. Other vital parameters, such as cell migration and an in-depth understanding of the interaction between native tissue cells and implant surfaces, are rarely considered. We investigated different laser-fabricated spike structures using primary and immortalized cell lines of fibroblasts and osteoblasts and included quantification of the cell area, aspect ratio, and focal adhesions. Furthermore, we examined the three-dimensional cell interactions with spike topographies and developed a tailored migration assay for long-term monitoring on opaque materials. While fibroblasts and osteoblasts on small spikes retained their normal morphology, cells on medium and large spikes sank into the structures, affecting the composition of the cytoskeleton and thereby changing cell shape. Up to 14 days, migration appeared stronger on small spikes, probably as a consequence of adequate focal adhesion formation and an intact cytoskeleton, whereas human primary cells revealed differences in comparison to immortalized cell lines. The use of primary cells, analysis of the cell-implant structure interaction as well as cell migration might strengthen the evaluation of cytocompatibility and thereby improve the validity regarding the putative in vivo performance of implant material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33182746
pii: ijms21228442
doi: 10.3390/ijms21228442
pmc: PMC7696563
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
ID : WVZN2860
Organisme : Volkswagen Foundation
ID : WVZN2860
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):15988-93
pubmed: 17905871
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Nov;2(11):797-809
pubmed: 30931172
Semin Cancer Biol. 2008 Feb;18(1):45-52
pubmed: 17928235
J Periodontol. 2012 Jan;83(1):90-100
pubmed: 21486180
Biomaterials. 2012 Jul;33(21):5230-46
pubmed: 22521491
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006 Jul;291(1):C68-75
pubmed: 16495370
Acta Biomater. 2010 Jan;6(1):291-301
pubmed: 19635598
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Nov;23(11):2813-9
pubmed: 22878727
Science. 2015 May 15;348(6236):1245075
pubmed: 25977557
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620
pubmed: 27478833
Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Aug;6(15):
pubmed: 28371540
FASEB J. 2013 Apr;27(4):1351-61
pubmed: 23254340
Mutat Res. 2013 Jan-Mar;752(1):10-24
pubmed: 22940039
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Oct;79(1):166-75
pubmed: 16788971
Nature. 2017 Dec 14;552(7684):219-224
pubmed: 29211717
Eur Cell Mater. 2012 Jul 09;24:1-17
pubmed: 22777949
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015 Oct;36(5):415-26
pubmed: 26589695
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2104-2119
pubmed: 29098919
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Feb 17;16(2):4327-42
pubmed: 25690041
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Apr;141(4):419-26
pubmed: 22464523
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Apr 1;61:965-78
pubmed: 26838926
Biomaterials. 2010 Dec;31(35):9182-91
pubmed: 20832853
Tissue Eng. 2007 Aug;13(8):2105-17
pubmed: 17518734
Acta Biomater. 2014 Feb;10(2):641-50
pubmed: 24252446
EMBO Rep. 2005 Jul;6 Spec No:S39-44
pubmed: 15995660
J Orthop Res. 2007 Nov;25(11):1523-33
pubmed: 17580337
Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1135-8
pubmed: 16293749
Biomaterials. 2007 Apr;28(13):2175-82
pubmed: 17275082
Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Sep;16(9):4329-40
pubmed: 16000373
Exp Cell Res. 2016 Apr 10;343(1):14-20
pubmed: 26519907
Micron. 2008;39(2):137-43
pubmed: 17223563
Soft Matter. 2009 Jan 7;5(1):72-77
pubmed: 21686049
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Dec;18(12):743-757
pubmed: 29115298
Adv Healthc Mater. 2012 May;1(3):285-91
pubmed: 23184742
Acta Biomater. 2009 Sep;5(7):2460-6
pubmed: 19410529
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(30):5406-15
pubmed: 19492373
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Aug;102(8):2636-43
pubmed: 23983015
Biomaterials. 2013 Nov;34(33):8097-104
pubmed: 23899447
Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Nov;26(11):798-800
pubmed: 27637342
Biomaterials. 2000 Apr;21(7):667-81
pubmed: 10711964
Biomaterials. 2011 May;32(13):3395-403
pubmed: 21310480
Nanomedicine. 2010 Oct;6(5):619-33
pubmed: 20138244
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jul;10(7):2907-18
pubmed: 24709541
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jan;10(1):21-33
pubmed: 19197329
Cell Tissue Res. 2007 May;328(2):339-54
pubmed: 17265007
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81689
pubmed: 24349113
Adv Mater. 2018 Dec;30(50):e1802724
pubmed: 30151909
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1998;212(2):75-84
pubmed: 9611998
MethodsX. 2014 Jul 07;1:56-9
pubmed: 26150935
Biomater Sci. 2018 May 29;6(6):1312-1338
pubmed: 29744496
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:253-270
pubmed: 27797406
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018 Jan 1;161:628-635
pubmed: 29156340
J Cell Sci. 2012 Apr 15;125(Pt 8):1855-64
pubmed: 22544950
Biomaterials. 2012 Apr;33(10):2835-47
pubmed: 22248989
Acta Biomater. 2014 Aug;10(8):3363-71
pubmed: 24721613
Biophys J. 2006 May 15;90(10):3774-82
pubmed: 16500965
Chemphyschem. 2004 Mar 19;5(3):383-8
pubmed: 15067875
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):10891-6
pubmed: 22711834
Dent Mater J. 2016;35(4):545-58
pubmed: 27477219
J Nanobiotechnology. 2017 Oct 2;15(1):64
pubmed: 28969628
Micron. 2010 Apr;41(3):210-9
pubmed: 19942444
Cell Microbiol. 2019 Oct;21(10):e13078
pubmed: 31270923
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):61-71
pubmed: 19516081
Biomed Mater. 2013 Oct;8(5):055005
pubmed: 24002791
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Oct 6;5(27):1231-42
pubmed: 18348958
J Biomater Appl. 2010 Sep;25(3):217-33
pubmed: 19773322
Interface Focus. 2014 Feb 6;4(1):20130048
pubmed: 24501676
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004 Dec 30;228(1-2):79-102
pubmed: 15541574
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Jul;103(7):2383-93
pubmed: 25430523
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;37(4):347-357
pubmed: 30316557
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Biomater Sci. 2018 Jul 24;6(8):2025-2053
pubmed: 29968869
Biophys J. 2009 Jul 8;97(1):357-68
pubmed: 19580774
J Cell Physiol. 2011 Jan;226(1):288-90
pubmed: 20658519
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018 Nov;186(3):633-643
pubmed: 29707732
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 May;103(5):1659-68
pubmed: 25089034