Quantitative Structure-Mutation-Activity Relationship Tests (QSMART) model for protein kinase inhibitor response prediction.
Afatinib
/ pharmacology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ metabolism
Cell Line, Tumor
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Humans
Lapatinib
/ pharmacology
Lung Neoplasms
/ metabolism
MAP Kinase Signaling System
/ drug effects
Mutation
Neural Networks, Computer
Precision Medicine
Protein Interaction Maps
/ drug effects
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ chemistry
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
Machine learning
Precision medicine
Protein kinase inhibitor
Systems pharmacology
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
ISSN: 1471-2105
Titre abrégé: BMC Bioinformatics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965194
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Nov 2020
12 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
09
05
2020
accepted:
27
10
2020
entrez:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
14
11
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Protein kinases are a large family of druggable proteins that are genomically and proteomically altered in many human cancers. Kinase-targeted drugs are emerging as promising avenues for personalized medicine because of the differential response shown by altered kinases to drug treatment in patients and cell-based assays. However, an incomplete understanding of the relationships connecting genome, proteome and drug sensitivity profiles present a major bottleneck in targeting kinases for personalized medicine. In this study, we propose a multi-component Quantitative Structure-Mutation-Activity Relationship Tests (QSMART) model and neural networks framework for providing explainable models of protein kinase inhibition and drug response ([Formula: see text]) profiles in cell lines. Using non-small cell lung cancer as a case study, we show that interaction terms that capture associations between drugs, pathways, and mutant kinases quantitatively contribute to the response of two EGFR inhibitors (afatinib and lapatinib). In particular, protein-protein interactions associated with the JNK apoptotic pathway, associations between lung development and axon extension, and interaction terms connecting drug substructures and the volume/charge of mutant residues at specific structural locations contribute significantly to the observed [Formula: see text] values in cell-based assays. By integrating multi-omics data in the QSMART model, we not only predict drug responses in cancer cell lines with high accuracy but also identify features and explainable interaction terms contributing to the accuracy. Although we have tested our multi-component explainable framework on protein kinase inhibitors, it can be extended across the proteome to investigate the complex relationships connecting genotypes and drug sensitivity profiles.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Protein kinases are a large family of druggable proteins that are genomically and proteomically altered in many human cancers. Kinase-targeted drugs are emerging as promising avenues for personalized medicine because of the differential response shown by altered kinases to drug treatment in patients and cell-based assays. However, an incomplete understanding of the relationships connecting genome, proteome and drug sensitivity profiles present a major bottleneck in targeting kinases for personalized medicine.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, we propose a multi-component Quantitative Structure-Mutation-Activity Relationship Tests (QSMART) model and neural networks framework for providing explainable models of protein kinase inhibition and drug response ([Formula: see text]) profiles in cell lines. Using non-small cell lung cancer as a case study, we show that interaction terms that capture associations between drugs, pathways, and mutant kinases quantitatively contribute to the response of two EGFR inhibitors (afatinib and lapatinib). In particular, protein-protein interactions associated with the JNK apoptotic pathway, associations between lung development and axon extension, and interaction terms connecting drug substructures and the volume/charge of mutant residues at specific structural locations contribute significantly to the observed [Formula: see text] values in cell-based assays.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
By integrating multi-omics data in the QSMART model, we not only predict drug responses in cancer cell lines with high accuracy but also identify features and explainable interaction terms contributing to the accuracy. Although we have tested our multi-component explainable framework on protein kinase inhibitors, it can be extended across the proteome to investigate the complex relationships connecting genotypes and drug sensitivity profiles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33183223
doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03842-6
pii: 10.1186/s12859-020-03842-6
pmc: PMC7664030
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Lapatinib
0VUA21238F
Afatinib
41UD74L59M
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
520Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA239106
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DMS-1903226
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01CA239106
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01GM122080
Pays : United States
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D447-52
pubmed: 25352553
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2014;:63-74
pubmed: 24297534
Bioinformatics. 2019 May 1;35(9):1527-1535
pubmed: 30304378
Bioinformatics. 2018 Aug 15;34(16):2808-2816
pubmed: 29528376
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Mar;7(3):169-81
pubmed: 17318210
Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Oct;13(10):714-26
pubmed: 24060863
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;15:489
pubmed: 26121976
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 28;5:
pubmed: 28299173
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 29;11(9):e1004498
pubmed: 26418249
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212108
pubmed: 30811440
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009 Jan 15;53(3):603-608
pubmed: 20084090
Mol Pharm. 2019 Dec 2;16(12):4797-4806
pubmed: 31618586
Mol Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;16(2):269-278
pubmed: 29133589
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D427-D432
pubmed: 30357350
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10915-9
pubmed: 1438297
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 31;6:23857
pubmed: 27030518
Pathol Res Pract. 2012 Sep 15;208(9):541-8
pubmed: 22824148
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D941-D947
pubmed: 30371878
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219774
pubmed: 31295321
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e61318
pubmed: 23646105
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2006 Nov;6(7):623-34
pubmed: 17100568
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22
pubmed: 20808728
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Jan 31;12(Suppl 1):18
pubmed: 30704458
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 15;25(2):288-9
pubmed: 19033274
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D558-D566
pubmed: 29140462
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D995-D1002
pubmed: 27903890
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 09;7:40321
pubmed: 28067293
J Mol Biol. 2018 Sep 14;430(18 Pt A):3016-3027
pubmed: 29626539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 29;116(44):22071-22080
pubmed: 31619572
J Biomol Tech. 2018 Jul;29(2):25-38
pubmed: 29805321
Biochem Pharmacol. 2010 Nov 15;80(10):1478-86
pubmed: 20696141
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018 Dec 7;13:303-311
pubmed: 30321817
Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(17):2111-20
pubmed: 16796559
Nat Genet. 2005 Dec;37(12):1315-6
pubmed: 16258541
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):i359-i368
pubmed: 28881998
Hum Mutat. 2015 Feb;36(2):175-86
pubmed: 25382819
Cell Death Differ. 2005 Aug;12(8):1044-56
pubmed: 16015381
Genome Res. 2017 Oct;27(10):1743-1751
pubmed: 28847918
Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 15;64(20):7241-4
pubmed: 15492241
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D955-61
pubmed: 23180760
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1121-D1127
pubmed: 29140520
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 22;20(1):44
pubmed: 30670007
Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 15;65(12):5096-104
pubmed: 15958553
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 11;8(1):8857
pubmed: 29891981
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 4;9(1):15918
pubmed: 31685861
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;32(17):i455-i463
pubmed: 27587662
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11347
pubmed: 28900181
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D649-D655
pubmed: 29145629
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):368-9
pubmed: 9847231
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 29;20(1):408
pubmed: 31357929
J Mol Biol. 2018 Sep 14;430(18 Pt A):2993-3004
pubmed: 29966608
PLoS Med. 2005 Mar;2(3):e73
pubmed: 15737014
BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Jan 31;12(Suppl 1):15
pubmed: 30704449
Genome Biol. 2014 Mar 03;15(3):R47
pubmed: 24580837
Cancer Cell. 2007 Mar;11(3):217-27
pubmed: 17349580
Acta Oncol. 1998;37(5):431-9
pubmed: 9831371
Bioinformatics. 2018 Jul 1;34(13):i509-i518
pubmed: 29949975
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1074-D1082
pubmed: 29126136
Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2129-41
pubmed: 12952881