Click-evoked and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses from individuals with multiple sclerosis.


Journal

Neuroscience letters
ISSN: 1872-7972
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Lett
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7600130

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 01 2021
Historique:
received: 19 03 2020
revised: 09 10 2020
accepted: 21 10 2020
pubmed: 14 11 2020
medline: 8 5 2021
entrez: 13 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine whether speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is more sensitive to the effects of multiple sclerosis (MS) than click-evoked ABR. Eleven previously-confirmed MS patients (8 females, 3 males) and nine controls (7 females, 2 males), matched in age and gender, participated in a repeated-measures design. Stimuli were presented monaurally to the right ear via insert earphone. All evoked potential responses were collected by a single-channel montage where three electrodes were placed on the center of the head (Cz: non-inverting/ active), the ipsilateral earlobe (inverting/ reference) and the contralateral earlobe (ground). Rarefaction clicks of 0.1 ms duration were presented at rates of 13.30 and 91.1 clicks per second. Speech-evoked ABRs were obtained using the BioMARK software and the Bio-Logic Navigator PRO hardware. A synthesized /da/ syllable of 40-ms duration was presented via alternating polarity and at a rate of 10.9 stimuli per second. Stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL. Speech-evoked ABR responses were obtained in quiet and in noise. Conventional click ABR responses were absent more often at high presentation rates in control subjects than in MS patients. Speech-evoked ABR peak amplitudes, wave E latency and VA complex slope variables separated the MS patients from controls. Group differences were also found in speech-evoked ABR response correlations in quiet versus noise conditions. The speech-evoked ABR is as or more sensitive to MS than conventional ABR measures without resort to simply noting missing peaks. Comparison of speech-evoked ABR responses in quiet and in noise highlight loss of neural synchrony in MS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33184036
pii: S0304-3940(20)30730-8
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135460
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

135460

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Dania Rishiq (D)

University of South Alabama, College of Allied Health Professions, The Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 5721 USA Drive N HAHN 1119, Mobile AL 36688, USA. Electronic address: drishiq@southalabama.edu.

Ashley Harkrider (A)

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 578 South Stadium Hall, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996-0740, USA.

Cary Springer (C)

University of Tennessee, Research Computing Support, Office of Information Technology, 517 Greve Hall, 821 Volunteer Blvd, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

Mark Hedrick (M)

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 578 South Stadium Hall, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996-0740, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH