Pulmonary passport: a service evaluation study of a standardised web-based procedure logbook to aid specialist respiratory training and appraisal.
bronchoscopy
pleural disease
Journal
BMJ open respiratory research
ISSN: 2052-4439
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Respir Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
revised:
18
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
14
11
2020
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pulmonary passport (PP) is a secure web-based procedural logbook for specialist respiratory trainees with enhanced functionality that includes automated analysis to provide key performance metrics and in-platform interactions with supervisors. This service evaluation study used preimplementation and postimplementation online surveys in both trainees and supervisors along with analysis of recorded data within the PP to evaluate the impact of this service on data capture, training, appraisal and quality assurance. From August 2017 to August 2019, 69/73 (95%) specialist respiratory trainees eligible to use the PP across two UK health education deaneries registered with the system and logged 7352 procedures. 3105 thoracic ultrasound procedures identified 2145 pleural effusions and resulted in 1253 pleural procedures of which 96% were successful. 4% of ultrasounds required referral to a more expert sonographer. Iatrogenic bleeding and pneumothorax both occurred in ≤1% of all pleural procedures. 1909 basic diagnostic bronchoscopies were recorded including 1236 bronchial washes, 328 brushes and 221 endobronchial biopsies where definite tumour was identified (biopsy sensitivity 74%). Preimplementation and postimplementation survey data confirmed the PP had increased the consistency of logging procedures by trainees, the depth of data captured, the review of procedural performance metrics in appraisal and the frequency of formal supervisor feedback. In this regional project, the implementation of a web-based procedural logbook has been feasible with excellent uptake and has enhanced procedural recording, supervision and appraisal. Furthermore, it provides unprecedented quality assurance at an individual trainee, trust and deanery level and has a number of potential wider applications in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33184058
pii: 7/1/e000690
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000690
pmc: PMC7662433
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Respiration. 2012;83(1):53-60
pubmed: 21912087
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106
pubmed: 31210174
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 May;7(1):
pubmed: 32430401
Respirology. 2014 May;19(4):472-82
pubmed: 24689877
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;39(6):747-754
pubmed: 30641592
Panminerva Med. 2019 Sep;61(3):203-231
pubmed: 30394710
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 Apr;21(2):117-22
pubmed: 24739684
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):495-501
pubmed: 26862890
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Mar;45(1):52-8
pubmed: 24899978
Thorac Cancer. 2017 Jul;8(4):291-295
pubmed: 28436174
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Jun;11(5):828-32
pubmed: 24762085
Clin Med (Lond). 2017 Oct;17(5):408-411
pubmed: 28974588
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):321-332
pubmed: 25674901
Respirology. 2012 Feb;17(2):291-9
pubmed: 21943051
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):773-9
pubmed: 22837376