Individualized-thresholding Shear Wave Elastography combined with clinical factors improves specificity in discriminating breast masses.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Area Under Curve
Breast
/ diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
/ methods
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Middle Aged
Precision Medicine
/ methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Mammary
Young Adult
Breast cancer
Breast masses
Elastography
Shear wave elastography
Ultrasound
Journal
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2020
revised:
27
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
pubmed:
15
11
2020
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
14
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the diagnostic role of new metrics, defined as individualized-thresholding of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) parameters, in association with clinical factors (such as age, mammographic density, lesion size and depth) and the BI-RADS features in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Of 644 consecutive patients (median age, 55 years), prospectively referred for evaluation, 659 ultrasound detected breast lesions underwent SWE measurements. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability of malignancy. The area under the curve (AUC), optimal cutoff value, and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. 265 of 659 (40.2%) masses were malignant. Using two E The false-positive rate can be significantly reduced when applying two E
Identifiants
pubmed: 33188991
pii: S0960-9776(20)30204-6
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.013
pmc: PMC7670190
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
248-255Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA148994
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article and the authors affirm that they have no financial interest related to the technology referenced in this paper. AA received grant R01CA148994 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH); AA and MF also received grant from National Science Foundation to support in part the project, however, the NIH and NSF did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Références
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2013 Oct;40(4):359-91
pubmed: 27277451
Breast Cancer. 2018 May;25(3):259-267
pubmed: 29651637
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0172801
pubmed: 28257467
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):89-97
pubmed: 21681447
Cancer Imaging. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):11
pubmed: 29622044
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0226994
pubmed: 31929558
BMC Cancer. 2009 Sep 20;9:335
pubmed: 19765317
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63
pubmed: 18477782
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):59-64
pubmed: 21330569
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1991 Jun;35(2):141-50
pubmed: 1914452
Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):3361-7
pubmed: 26815368
Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):79-85
pubmed: 15618376
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 May;94(5):551-60
pubmed: 23607924
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0165003
pubmed: 27776153
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):32-41
pubmed: 32427557
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):224-9
pubmed: 22691969
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Sep;62(9):1644-50
pubmed: 26688871
Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):1023-32
pubmed: 22210408
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Mar;46(3 Suppl 1):S7-15
pubmed: 24512933
Radiographics. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):623-39
pubmed: 27082663
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0119398
pubmed: 25774978
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Jun;31(6):895-902
pubmed: 22644686
Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2432-40
pubmed: 23673572
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):665-72
pubmed: 19567644
Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):147-55
pubmed: 24169069
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Aug;31(8):1239-44
pubmed: 22837288
Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):1015-26
pubmed: 23085867
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jan;23(1):53-61
pubmed: 26564483
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Mar;45(3):376-85
pubmed: 25249389
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1394-404
pubmed: 22474203
Semin Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;36(3):217-25
pubmed: 11475068
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137898
pubmed: 26368939
Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):435-49
pubmed: 22282182
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Feb;31(2):289-94
pubmed: 22298873
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R104
pubmed: 21122101
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):1169-77
pubmed: 23096195
Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74
pubmed: 10197347
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
pubmed: 12355001