Comparison of the Costs of Reusable Versus Disposable Equipment for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures Using Activity-Based Costing Analysis.


Journal

The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 30 08 2019
revised: 03 07 2020
accepted: 28 08 2020
pubmed: 17 11 2020
medline: 7 8 2021
entrez: 16 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Guidelines for sterilization of reusable equipment (eg, arthroscopes, surgical equipment) have recently been established. These guidelines are supported by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and affect costs for sterilization. The current analysis was undertaken to understand if reusable or disposable endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) equipment is a less-expensive option. An activity-based cost analysis was undertaken to determine the costs of reusable versus disposable equipment for ECTR. Costs of disposable equipment were obtained from manufacturers. Costs of processing reusable equipment including labor, time, cost of operating room time, and sterilization supplies and equipment were obtained from the literature and from recent reports identifying these costs. Infection rates and costs of infection were also factored in. Decision analysis software was used to determine the expected costs of each option (disposable vs reusable). A sensitivity analysis was undertaken on those variables that were determined to have the greatest effect on the overall costs of the procedure and sterilization. Costs for each option when totaled were $917 for disposable and $1,019 for reusable equipment, resulting in cost savings of $102 with disposable equipment. Reusable equipment was the least costly option when the following costs/events occurred: cost of a disposable arthroscope, >$452; cost of disposable ECTR, >$647; costs of operating room time, <$28.63/min; set up time, <6.8 minutes for reusable equipment; and cost of disposable ECTR blade used with reusable equipment, <$160. When considering the cost of operating room time, preparation, and processing of reusable equipment for ECTR, the disposable equipment for this procedure is less costly. Economic Analysis II.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33191039
pii: S0363-5023(20)30535-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

339.e1-339.e15

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jeffrey Voigt (J)

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: jdv4957@aol.com.

Daniel Seigerman (D)

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

Kevin Lutsky (K)

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

Pedro Beredjiklian (P)

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

Charles Leinberry (C)

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH