Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol.
epidemiology
geriatric medicine
health services administration & management
palliative care
public health
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 11 2020
14 11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Care homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents' medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents. A realist review will be conducted in three research stages.Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS.Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved.Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context-mechanism-outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions. The University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff. CRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33191266
pii: bmjopen-2020-040397
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397
pmc: PMC7668360
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e040397Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Dec;12(4):382-404
pubmed: 29916302
Can J Aging. 2011 Sep;30(3):371-90
pubmed: 21851753
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):165
pubmed: 30021527
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Sep;3(9):e447-e455
pubmed: 30174210
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Mar;17(2):122-37
pubmed: 25939731
Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(18):1-281
pubmed: 23632142
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jun 1;16(6):470-4
pubmed: 25659622
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):727-35
pubmed: 19531805
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):97-103
pubmed: 23864424
Gerontologist. 2010 Jun;50(3):352-62
pubmed: 20026525
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18
pubmed: 23406398
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jul;72:60-70
pubmed: 28494333
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jan;69(1):194-204
pubmed: 22591030
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 22;4(7):e005601
pubmed: 25052175
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Health Info Libr J. 2010 Jun;27(2):114-22
pubmed: 20565552
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 09;11:17
pubmed: 26860631
BMJ Open. 2014 May 30;4(5):e005356
pubmed: 24879830
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Sep;28(3):642-53
pubmed: 9756234
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):976-981
pubmed: 29500822
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34
pubmed: 16053581
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e015477
pubmed: 28939568
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2008 Oct-Dec;31(4):E67-79
pubmed: 19033741
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 16;10:166
pubmed: 20550719
BMC Geriatr. 2009 Nov 29;9:52
pubmed: 19943969
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):279
pubmed: 29642929
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 09;12:5
pubmed: 22230771
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug;20(8):956-962.e8
pubmed: 31129021
Age Ageing. 2003 May;32(3):279-85
pubmed: 12720613
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 29;6(1):266
pubmed: 29284538
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Jun;5(2):131-41
pubmed: 26052652
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):311-46
pubmed: 22709390
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Jul 24;12:41
pubmed: 30061922
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;20(12):1045-56
pubmed: 21952123
Drugs Aging. 2018 Jan;35(1):73-81
pubmed: 29222667
Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):327-9
pubmed: 16788075