Anatomical quadrilateral plate for acetabulum fractures involving quadrilateral surface: A review.
Acetabulum fracture
Anatomical plate
Anterior column fractures
Comminution
Dual cortical fixation
Osteoporosis
Quadrilateral plate fractures
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
24
08
2020
revised:
07
10
2020
accepted:
08
10
2020
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
17
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The management of acetabulum fractures in osteoporotic elderly, as well as comminuted fractures in younger patients is likely to be difficult. These fractures need specific fixation techniques especially when the quadrilateral plate is involved. Standard implants may not be able to adequately support the fixation, so newer pre-shaped fixation plates have been proposed with some of these already in use. The concept of anatomic plates has come up for many fracture locations for providing a better buttress effect to the comminuted fragments. There has been a need to look for an anatomic buttress plates being developed for acetabulum fractures involving the quadrilateral surface. The literature has been reviewed to find the various newer designs that have been used for buttressing the quadrilateral surface in comminuted acetabular fractures. An attempt has been made to study their design characteristics and clinical outcomes. The review also includes the analysis of Anatomic Quadrilateral plate (AQP) used in fixation of acetabulum fracture involving quadrilateral surface in a series of 33 patients. There has been few anatomical plates developed for the stabilization of acetabular quadrilateral surface fractures. Some of these plates have been successfully used in management of acetabular fractures primarily in young patients. Issues however remain in their application and outcomes in osteoporotic fractures of the acetabulum, as these plates support the pelvic brim fragments either from superior or medial surface. The newer development i.e. 'Anatomical Quadrilateral Plate' is optimized to counter the displacement forces due to its positioning on the pelvic brim rather than its superior or medial surface. Other special features include the possibility of longer screws across bone due to oblique position of holes, the typical location of a locking hole on the plate beam which permits dual cortical compression fixation either by using a bigger screw or a specially designed screw in screw construct across the supra-acetabular corridor. The option of using hybrid fixation of both locking and unlocked screws in AQP allows proper stress distribution on the underlying bone, aiding both primary as well as secondary stability. The minimum of one year post surgery outcome of patients having acetabular fixation using this Anatomic quadrilateral plate has been analyzed in 33 patients. Twenty three of these were aged more than 50 years and 28 out of total 33 were males. Associated injuries included Ipsilateral lower limb injury in 2 patients and distal radius fracture in 5 patients. The fracture pattern included 'Anterior column posterior hemi-transverse' in 10 patients,' Associated Both Column' injury in 9 and 'T type' acetabular fractures in 8 patients. Isolated 'Anterior column' was fractured in 6 patients. The surgical approach was 'Anterior Intra-pelvic' (AIP) in 23 patients and 'Modified Ileo-femoral' in other 10 patients. One patient had additional K L approach. Among the implants, the AQP plate was used without its pubic arm in 6 patients. The post-operative x rays showed anatomical reduction in 28 patients, while other 5 had gaps and/or steps up to 2 mm size. In subsequent car, one of these patients needed hip arthroplasty for problem arising due to collapse in fixation within six months. EQ 5D 5L telephonic score was used to know the outcome at minimum of one year follow up in 33 patients. As per this score, only 3 patients had an issue with mobility, with only one having problem in self-care activity. Six patients complained of minor limitations in carrying out their usual activities and only one patient had anxiety affecting him. In their self-assessment of overall health status, 22 patients marked it 100, 7 made it 90, 3 as 80 and 1 had marked it as 70 in a score range of 0-100. Considering the predominant elderly profile in this series of patients, the acetabular reconstruction using 'Anatomic quadrilateral plate' has shown encouraging results. For stabilization of acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral surface area and pelvic brim, various new implants have been used. The Anatomic quadrilateral plate due to its anatomical shape, the various options in fracture fixation is best optimized for management of comminuted acetabulum fractures especially in poor quality bones. It has been successful in achieving good outcome in elderly group of patients having these complex injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33192011
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.013
pii: S0976-5662(20)30482-3
pmc: PMC7656483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1072-1081Informations de copyright
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have none to declare.
Références
Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2054-2059
pubmed: 28778730
Can J Surg. 2009 Jun;52(3):221-8
pubmed: 19503667
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):560-4
pubmed: 20357335
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1979 Aug;94(3):209-12
pubmed: 496593
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1813-1818
pubmed: 28602177
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3353-61
pubmed: 25080262
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29 Suppl 2:S25-8
pubmed: 25486002
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul;31(7):e210-e216
pubmed: 28240619
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8231301
pubmed: 28698880
Z Orthop Unfall. 2016 Oct;154(5):488-492
pubmed: 27366952
Injury. 2013 Feb;44(2):159-67
pubmed: 23121991
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45
pubmed: 8934477
Orthopedics. 2010 Oct;33(10):752-5
pubmed: 20954622
Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Apr;44(2):201-15
pubmed: 23544824
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):855-861
pubmed: 31862320
Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):e180-e186
pubmed: 30602047
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):250-7
pubmed: 20130318
Injury. 2016 Jun;47 Suppl 2:S11-20
pubmed: 27338221
Injury. 2012 Apr;43(4):470-4
pubmed: 22261082
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:370631
pubmed: 26495030
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29 Suppl 12:S28-33
pubmed: 26584263
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1307-15
pubmed: 24093709
Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):296-301
pubmed: 29241997
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;11(2):109-19
pubmed: 12670137
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4651518
pubmed: 28194414
Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Apr;44(2):183-200
pubmed: 23544823
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S107-11
pubmed: 15517184
Injury. 2011 Oct;42(10):1130-4
pubmed: 21156315
Injury. 2013 Feb;44(2):266-73
pubmed: 23199759
Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Jun;51(3):421-8
pubmed: 7446021
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(5):166-174
pubmed: 29473833
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Sep;32(7):783-9
pubmed: 20627657
Injury. 2016 Jun;47 Suppl 2:S3-S10
pubmed: 27338224
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 21;15:387
pubmed: 25414116
Injury. 2012 Dec;43 Suppl 2:S33-41
pubmed: 23622990
Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):405-10
pubmed: 20035936